Beginning with the analysis of the two separate passages found in 5.1.127-139 and 1.3.200-207, there comes into view an overall theme that is central to the overall plot of the play, but is clearly demonstrated in Falstaff’s and Hotspur’s conceptualizations of honor in acts 5 and 1 respectively: the polysemous nature of honor. Meaning, there are countless interpretations of honor, it can be perceived in various and vastly contrasting ways. With respect to Shakespeare’s skillful utilization of the polysemous nature of honor, the two characters, Falstaff and Hotspur, are designful manifestations of such a nature, considering their two distinctly contrasting ideas of what honor is, as well as how their contrasting conceptualizations impact, or influence, their actions. In light of honor’s seemingly countless conceptualizations, Falstaff offers his particularly unique understanding of honor. Briefly at the battle of Shrewsbury, he makes his speech on the subject in the first …show more content…
Such distinct, yet equally true, interpretations effectively support the specified theme of the twain passages that honor, is indeed, polysemuous in nature, in both the process of its obtainment, and its resulting glorification of the individual that possesses it. Although the theme should be supported by the simple existence of contrasting interpretations, by both Falstaff and Hotspur, it is completely exhibited/embodied in/by their actions in the play. For instance, Falstaff fully/blatantly dismisses honor and therefore unshamefully/proudly leads the life of a thief; not to mention his false death at the play’s end. Hotspur, on the other hand, goes into the battle at Shrewsbury in full embrace of the glorious death he ultimately takes at the hand of Prince
In Shakespeare’s play, King Henry IV Part 1, Hotspur’s speech to King Henry, in attempt to explain why he did not free prisoners when ordered to do so by the courtier, employs that he is an impetuous leader that is incapable of consistently obtaining respect. Hotspur says that the courtier confronted him after the battle, and that the man was, “neat, and trimly dressed, / Fresh as a bridegroom” (I.3.32-33). The man is composed and feminine, which prominently disgusts Hotspur. His repugnance of “neat” is looked down upon by King Henry, and is not respected by those Hotspur entails respect from. Hotspur is a hasty soldier that evidently contains no tolerance for weakness, fear, or even the slight details of courtly behavior.
Honor should be the most important theme in the play because each character has their own way of honoring what they believe in. Both characters are not wrong
After reading The Outsiders, Much Ado About Nothing(MAAN), and “The Charge of the Light Brigade”(TCLB) we as readers are able to see how all three authors use honor to develop the theme. In The Outsiders there are two social groups: Socs and Greasers, and they hate each other. The Socs are always ganging up on the Greasers; the Greasers can’t take it anymore so they start to rebel back. The Socs try to drown Ponyboy but Johnny(Ponyboy’s friend) kills Bob(a Soc); this results in them running away and later they are honored as heroes for saving children from a fire. In MAAN Claudio and Hero fall in madly in love.
In Titus 3:2 it says “to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy toward all people (ESV).” If there were a verse to symbolize the idea of a perfect knight, it would be Titus 3:2. It exemplifies the rules of chivalry back in the medieval romance period very well. In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Gawain illustrates the rules of chivalry and event to the point where some consider him the perfect knight. Unfortunately though, there are times throughout the poem that he displays his imperfections, but do they outweigh all the multiple other positive attributes and decisions he makes?
Honor in Shakespeare’s Play Henry IV, Act One (The View of Honor in the Eyes of Falstaff and Hotspur in Shakespeare’s Play Henry IV, Act One) In Shakespeare’s play, Henry IV, Part One, two characters define what honor is to them. Hotspur and Falstaff are two different characters completely, one is a son of a nobleman and the other is a thief. Hotspur is son to Earl of Northumberland, making him the heir as well, the nephew of Earl of Worcester, and a good warrior too. The real name of Hotspur is Harry Percy, a member of the Percy family, which helped King Henry IV gain his power.
Even during the darkest times in this play, respect is being shown. During the play, not all characters choose to show respect to each of the other characters. The ones that do are the more mature individuals in the play. For instance, Falstaff is not one of the characters who shows respect to the other characters.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight written by an unknown author the story follows the knight Sir Gawain when he takes up the beheading challenge of the Green Knight. Gawain is to strike the Green Knight with an axe and the Green Knight is to return the favor in a year and a day. This story has elements of chivalry, Anglo-Saxon values, and characteristics of medieval romance. Chivalry is a code of honor that knights are supposed to follow. Gawain knows that he will surely die is he honors the challenge he made with the Green Knight, however chivalry requires that a knight can not refuse a challenge.
In the Poem Henry IV Part 1, Prince Hal and Hotspur was similar and different in many ways. They are both honorable people in their own way. However, King Henry thinks that Hotspur is best fitted as the man of honor because he successful in battle, fearless, and spend his time with royalty. In the poem, King Henry states Hotspur is “the theme of honor tongue” (1.1.80). King Henry mentions in the poem how he would rather have an honorable man as a son instead of someone who he believes is dishonorable.
During the Medieval times chivalry was one of the most important characteristics a knight could display. Chivalry was viewed as a moral obligation that involved bravery, honor, respect, and gallantry. Knights were expected to uphold this code or face social consequences for any infractions, with punishments ranging from humiliation to termination of their knighthood. “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight” presents the struggles knights faced with honoring the chivalrous code at all times. Sir Gawain, while imperfect, exhibits qualities expected of knights and embodies the internal struggle between honoring the chivalrous code and giving into selfish desires.
Anglo-Saxon Culture The Anglo-Saxon Culture is based on kinship,courage,and honor. Kinship in the Anglo-Saxon culture was the respect of social standards and the hierarchy and in turn helped the society to run relatively smoothly. Courage to the Anglo saxons was very important because it showed how high your social status should be and how much of a “man” you are and weather you deserve the honor given to you . Honor is arguably one of the most important things to the Anglo-Saxons seeing as if you earned enough honor you could move up in society and accand to positions such as a high ranking soldier or even at times under some conditions the king.
Follow the Code (An Analysis of King Arthur’s Code of Chivalry in Morte d’Arthur) The sword and the stone is a long lived story still being told since before 1471, over five hundred years now. There are many aspects of this story that can be analyzed for different purposes. This story of Morte d’Arthur scripted by Sir Thomas Malory displays a great example of the code of chivalry and the way it was admired in the time of King Arthur himself and the Knights of the Round Table.
Reputation and honor creates for the most riveting theme in Shakespeare’s Othello. Evidently, no character speaks of themselves as an honorable person; instead they boast and use their reputation to unveil their superiority. Foremost, it defines a character and how they are perceived in society. Allows for the influencing or manipulation of others at the same time, concealing any wrongful acts. Eventually, in the long run it even determines the ending results.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s 1597 History “The First Part of King Henry the Fourth”, the importance of individual reputation proves to be a catalyst for character advancement and plot development alike. King Henry’s repeated emphasis on the superior characteristics of himself and Hotspur earlier in the scene establish a dichotomy between the ideal leader and Prince Henry. In a rebuttal to his father 's disapproving tone, Hal vows to reclaim both his honor as a prince and his honor as a son. Shakespeare’s use of language through lines 129-159 in act III.2 foreshadows events to come while reinforcing Prince Henry’s earlier assertion that he will be the victor when battling Hotspur.
However, Henry’s uneven temper once more gets the better of him when he learns that the Duke of York and the Earl of Suffolk have died. The order is given that “every soldier kill his prisoners!” (IV.6.37). This barbarous order, however, was instead viewed by Fluellen and Gower as heroic because the French killed some children, something that Henry has threatened to do. Moreover, Shakespeare is playing with the reader’s morals here by using unneeded violence to
Chivalrous Ideals in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight It is common to see benevolent characters in early english literature such as Sir Gawain, who is yet another example of a knight who has been put into a problematic situation and must choose to stay true to his chivalrous nature or protect himself. Chivalry and the ethics of a knight are obvious running themes in The Pearl Poet’s, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. The author, throughout the story, uses Gawain’s bravery, honor, and loyalty to show the ideal of knighthood. From the very beginning of the poem, young Sir Gawain puts others before himself.