A Case Summary Of Falstaff Brewing Company
Melanie Garcia, Joey Esquivel, Jessica Lemus, Ana Lomeli, Lisa Odom
BUS 18A, SECTION NUMBER 1072
CASE BRIEF: Due 11/24/15 (481 words) 1. Case Name, Citation & Court:
Miller Brewing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Falstaff Brewing Corporation 655 F.2d 5 211 U.S.P.Q. 665 (1981), U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit 2. Key Facts
A. Miller sold and advertised reduced calorie beer under the name “Miller Lite” since 1972.
B. Falstaff Brewing Corporation produced and sold beer under “Falstaff Lite Beer”.
C. Miller argued that the term “Lite” was known under its own brand name and would mistake consumers with Falstaff brand under Lanham Trade-Mark Act.
D. It was determined that
…show more content…
A = Analysis A. Miller Brewing Company strived to claim the generic word "Lite" in marketing advertisements, to differentiate themselves from any and all brewing companies including Falstaff from misrepresentation.
B. Generic terms such as "Lite" cannot be preserved under trademark law because it would violate the Federal Unfair Competition Law.
C. Under the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, a generic term is not subject to de jure protection.
D. Miller Brewing Company was debarred by principles of collateral estoppel from successfully obtaining the generic term "Lite".
E. Miller Brewing Company's complaint includes a preliminary injunction that is supported by insufficient, irrelevant evidence that the district court did not postulate.
F. Miller Brewing Company's argument was declined in an action against Falstaff, because the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit decided adversely that the issue held no validity.
5. C = Conclusion
No, “Lite” is a generic term that does not fall into trademark protection for Miller Brewing Company in connection with reduced calorie beer under Lanham Trade-Mark
Critique Of Patriotism In Dave Barry's Red White And Beer
1208 Words | 5 PagesProvided the advertisers can make it seem having possession of the product is a show of patriotism. He laments that the Miller beer tastes like “rat saliva” but that is a non-issue since consuming it is a show of loyalty (Red, White, and Beer, para.2). Everyone wants to be seen as a patriot
Summary Of Charles Katz V. United States
430 Words | 2 PagesThe plaintiff filed to have the evidence suppressed, but the motion was denied. Prior Proceeding: A motion was filed to the Los Angeles Court of Appeals to have the evidence suppressed, but it was rejected. The Plaintiff felt his 4th Amendment right was violated.
Turner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis
955 Words | 4 PagesCase Analysis Paper / Discussion MBA 623 Name: Patel Mukeshkumar Shamalbhai Paper # Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 (3d Cir. 2006) Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim.
Case Study: Gallagher V. Viking Supply Corp.
445 Words | 2 PagesAdditionally, there was no intent on the behalf of the defendant to conceal the type of service which was being offered. Judges Verdict
United Biscuits V Claimant Analysis
1975 Words | 8 Pageswas not sufficient’ Embedded also in the tort of passing off is the need to establish that the goodwill in one’s trade had been misrepresented as that of another trader. Misrepresentation it is said ‘need not be intentional for a passing off action to succeed, and innocence of misrepresentation is no defence.’ The misrepresentation of goodwill therefore could touch on ‘the origin of the goods, their quality, or even the way they are made.’ The misrepresentation ought to be actionable or material. It is of the essence that a consumer is deceived due to such a misrepresentation.
Virgil Reece Murphy: A Case Study
151 Words | 1 PagesIn the late 1910’s, Virgil Reece Murphy lived on the border of Putnam County and Overton County in a community called Spring Creek. It was there that he was taught how to craft moonshine from other family members. This skill allowed for him to craft delectable homebrew which attracted customers from all places. This highly successful practice, however, was to soon come into confrontation with the politics.
If Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?
1006 Words | 5 PagesAn Opening Your Honor, the opposing counsel, members of the jury, this case is about the unreliability of evidence and an insufficiency to meet the burden of proof that is required to convict Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor with a violation of Nita Liquor Commission Regulation 3.102. This case is to be decided on four issues: 1) Knowledge. Whether the Defendant, Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor, knew or ought to have known that the customer, Mr. Watkins, was intoxicated? 2) Sale.
Lanham Act Case Study
805 Words | 4 PagesUnder the Lanham Act, a business has the right to market a product using a distinctive word, mark, slogan, etc. as long as its logo is a registered trademark. Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act protects trade dress, a guard to protect the design and shape of a particular product. However, it is important to note that this only protects against the copying of a design that is distinctive. In order for a product to be distinctive it must be inherently distinctive or have an acquired distinctiveness.
Ibarra V. Thaler Case Summary
1454 Words | 6 PagesIn the case of Ibarra v. Thaler, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155988 the court where the court finds error in the application of the law the Respondent 's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. It is further as well addressing evidence rule 405 the order of that Petitioner 's application for federal writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. It is further as well the ordered that Petitioner 's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED.
Keurig Case Summary
162 Words | 1 PagesKeurig took a risk with the decision to let their patents expire. The decision created more outside competition and allowed private companies to make their own version of the K-Cup. There is a possibility, given Keurig had renewed their patents, that they would not be in their current situation. Today, you can go into most stores and find different brands of K-Cups. Kroger, Walmart, and other coffee brands all have their own lines of K-Cups and some have decreased their prices to compete with Keurig.
Argumentative Essay: The Case Of Miller Vs. California
604 Words | 3 PagesThe court noted that the material that Miller distributed by Miller was not protected under the first Amendment. The court said that the materials Miller distributed were offensive to people, therefore violates the California Statute. (“Miller v. California. ")This is a similar argument that is used
Examples Of Prohibition In America 1920
1925 Words | 8 Pages1 Prohibition in America 1920 1.1 The Political Concept of Prohibition The concept of prohibition (lat. prohibere, to prohibit) describes a lawful ban with enforcement. The reasoning can be religious, economically or politically. It is mostly used to prohibit drugs and thus protecting the population from the substance.
Case Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA
1045 Words | 5 PagesName: Patel Mukeshkumar Paper # JANET M. TURNER, Appellant v. HERSHEY CHOCOLATE USA Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim. The appellant’s essential accommodation claim went to trial, but court excluded evidence regarding disability.
Pros And Cons Of Interim Relief
1491 Words | 6 PagesIn the case of a plaintiff or party’s rights, a temporary injunction is not conclusive or deciding. If rights have been harmed, a preliminary injunction can halt progress to prevent further injustice. At the point of a temporary injunction, the court examines the present state and circumstances before continuing into an area that would obstruct the rights of the parties involved. The use of this injunction is generally considered to be appropriate only in extraordinary
Louis Vuitton Case Summary
821 Words | 4 PagesName - Mayank Saxena Case write up: Louis Vuitton Executive Summary Louis Vuitton’s (LV) major source of revenue was Fashion and leather goods which was 35% as compared to other products and 20% of this revenue came from Japan, undoubtedly a strong hold in the Japanese markets, with that being said, there are a lot many opportunities for LV to exploit in terms of new and emerging markets like China and India, which have a lot of untapped potential. They can expand their market segment by targeting the middle class and upper middle class bracket, and diversify their target audience i.e. women by introducing clothing for men and children. The key to deal with the current situation of LV would be to reduce dependency on Japanese markets and
More about A Case Summary Of Falstaff Brewing Company
Critique Of Patriotism In Dave Barry's Red White And Beer
1208 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of Charles Katz V. United States
430 Words | 2 PagesTurner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis
955 Words | 4 PagesCase Study: Gallagher V. Viking Supply Corp.
445 Words | 2 PagesUnited Biscuits V Claimant Analysis
1975 Words | 8 PagesVirgil Reece Murphy: A Case Study
151 Words | 1 PagesIf Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?
1006 Words | 5 PagesLanham Act Case Study
805 Words | 4 PagesIbarra V. Thaler Case Summary
1454 Words | 6 PagesKeurig Case Summary
162 Words | 1 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Case Of Miller Vs. California
604 Words | 3 PagesExamples Of Prohibition In America 1920
1925 Words | 8 PagesCase Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA
1045 Words | 5 PagesPros And Cons Of Interim Relief
1491 Words | 6 PagesLouis Vuitton Case Summary
821 Words | 4 Pages