The articles, Family Guy: Undermining Satire by Nick Marx and Fox and Friends: Political Talk by Jeffrey P. Jones, are very different articles, however, they both address how television affects culture. These articles, found in the edited novel of “How To Watch Television,” edited by Ethan Thompson and Jason Mittell, describe how a cartoon, like Family Guy, or a morning talk show, like Fox and Friends, can influence consumers opinions, actions, and how television producers have to keep audiences attentions. The purpose of this paper is to summarize both of these articles and to create an analysis of Jason Mittell’s book “Television and American Culture.” After reading this paper, the reader may question how they watch television in the future …show more content…
Marx talks about how Family Guy has to battle with the internet and video games to keep their age demographic intrigued. Because of this click culture, Marx implies that Family Guy’s humor may be one way to keep the 18 to 34 age group entertained. However, when it comes to satire Family Guy pushes the boundaries of it. Satire is supposed to be constructive criticism on social issues, however, Marx states that Family Guy does not do this. One example Marx gave was in one episode, Family Guy made a racist joke about how Mexicans live even though it was unrelated to the main joke. This is a direct example of what Marx means by Family Guy is undermining satire. Family Guy may be trying to touch on the horrible living conditions many Mexicans live with, however, that kind of impact was not made by this joke. Seth Macfarlane, the creator of the show, says that the show offends everyone equally which makes it funny. However, Marx talked about by offending everyone real social issues can look less important than they …show more content…
When watching television, many people laugh at jokes and do not think about the context that they are said in. Also, many people believe everything the news stations tell them because the news should be a trustworthy place to find information. These jokes and untrustworthy sources are what shapes people’s opinions on different topics, which affect issues in America. When Fox and Friends attacked President Obama for supposedly being Muslim or was not born in the United States, many people bought into that philosophy and believed Fox and Friends were telling the truth. Also, people were afraid that Family Guy would devalue the meaning of a movie “Precious” by making a poster that said if the voters did not vote for Family Guy, Peter Griffin was dressed like the movies main African American actor, then they would be racist and other prejudice things. Many people can see that as a joke but it can undermine what the movie “Precious” was trying to convey. When watching television, viewers have to realize that what they watch, and what they allow their children to watch, has a big influence on how they perceive the world. For example, Mittell talked about experimental research that suggested there is a connection between children watching violent television and them being aggressive later in life. For teens who watch Family Guy, they may be influenced to say inappropriate and
In Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death, he argues that the old print-based culture's precision and complexity overwhelm the present focus on TV's simplicity and speed. Postman organizes his book chronologically, so the reader first sees the positives of the print era then the negatives of the transition into a world of visual screens. Through this sequence, he illustrates the difference between the abundant product information in the 1800s with the entertainment of television commercials. He compares the focused, favorable audience of the past with the current hyperactive television viewers, which the politicians notice and replace complex plans with single sentence quips. Towards the end of the book, he deeply analyzes the adverse futures
John Oliver’s Sugar - Satire Review “The Average American eats 22 teaspoons of sugar a day, 5 times the proper amount!” This is a quote from the host of “Last Week Tonight” John Oliver in his video over making producers include an ‘added sugar’ slot on product nutrition labels. Consumers should at least get to know what the food we eat contains. The producers are trying to avoid including the “added sugar” on their labels. Their reaction should make you question how much sugar they include in their products.
However, Peacocke fails to recognize that Family Guy airs tamed comedy for entertainment by demonstrating how many elements that are portrayed on the show exists in our society today without intentionally hurting its viewers.
Comedy has become a part of a vast majority of television shows, especially satirical comedy, rising to the top with shows such as: The Daily Show, Chappelle’s Show and Saturday Night Live to name a few. These satirical comedies have had a vast and continuing impact on the discourse in today’s society. By examining “Black White Supremacy,” by Dave Chappelle and “Conservative Libertarian,” by Jon Steward, through their use of satire, we can see that skits such as these have a lasting impact on society by creating discourse on the objects being mocked. “A Black White Supremacist,” by Dave Chappelle highlights the absurdity of racism by parodying members of white supremacy groups such as the KKK. Whereas, Chappelle is addressing a social justice
An example of this racism and stereotyping in TV shows made as humor is the ever long lasting show, The Simpsons. A long running joke on this show is the use Hindus only working in grocery stores and giving their owners very stereotypical name for being Hindu. These subtle but racist on going joking, but the public think it is okay to have these racist mindsets. Using stereotypes are also happens frequently in movies.
“ (3). In the video, a lot of children were being stereotyped by the way they were. Adults or even classmates kept telling the boys who were facing stereotype to “grow a pair..” or to “be a man” for what they were and how they acted. From that I believe that as much as those jokes are kept thrown around, people will be saying, “well maybe”, joining along the joke
Neil Postman and Steve Powers focus only on the television news and the ways it can manipulate the audience. Though “Television News: The Language of Pictures” and “Amusing Ourselves to Depth” both
The ability to parse through bullshit from politicians can be difficult, and it is not made easier by the news networks. The news has become notorious for being untrustworthy according to all sides of the political spectrum, with each point of view criticizing different networks for different reasons. This has led to an industry of satire calling out the news’ handling of stories, which includes popular programs like South Park and The Daily Show. Analyzing South Park’s and Jon Stewart’s satire shows how the news media utilizes bullshit to benefit a certain narrative and not the viewer. To begin, one episode of South Park that deals extensively in bullshit from the news is “Quest for Ratings”, which shows the boys trying to earn high ratings
Since its premiere in 1989, The Simpsons has continued to earn popularity among young and adults, and simultaneously, the show has gained a place in the iconic hall of fame of the American cult. Currently in its twenty-seventh season, the cartoon became the longest-running TV show and situation comedy ever. Doubtless, The Simpsons play a major role in criticizing the American popular culture; therefore, it has a significant impact on our perception of society and reality itself. Moreover, The Simpsons can be also seen from a different viewpoint regarding the connection between popular culture and philosophy since philosophy is engaged in finding answers related to distinct arguments such as existence and human behavior. It also interesting
The article “South Park and the Carnivalesque” written by Alison Halsall delves into both parody and satire within the context of the program. South Park’s Carnivalesque humor, or carnival laughter “is a method by which popular culture in general, and South Park in particular, provides liberation from constraint” (Halsall 24). South Park makes it a point to use humor that provokes the inherent “dirtiness” that we contain, in an attempt to expose cultural aspects that generally go undiscussed (Halsall 34). Through profanity, South Park brings carnival humor down to the basic grotesque humor that serves to “critique linguistic sanitation” (Halsall 34).
I believe that any controversial or offensive topic is acceptable if it is presented using humor, but in order for the joke to work it must use the appropriate context. For example, Chappelle’s Show staring comedian Dave Chappelle uses stereotypes to positively reveal the social injustices that occur in American society. The show ridicules racism by exaggerating racial stereotypes to demonstrate how nonsensical they truly are. By satirizing the stereotypes and assumptions that people make about different races, Chappelle's Show attempts to encourage its audience to question both the reliability and the validity of such stereotypes. Family Guy uses a similar technique when crafting their humor.
The show strives to expose all the preconceived notions and beliefs society has put in place and mocks ALL stereotypes. The show portrays both low and high culture in general and makes fun of them, but at the same time does not encourage it. Most people who watch Family Guy can relate strongly. That’s because the show acts like a mirror and we the audience are forced to take a look at ourselves, but at the same time providing amusement and humor for the reflection.
When I was twelve years old, I became bored of kid’s TV shows. I knew it was time to try to find something new to watch. I had heard of some cartoon about a talking baby and talking dog, and enjoyed watching it when I stumbled upon it one day when flipping through the channels. Little I did I understand most of the jokes. Re-watching episodes now that I haven’t seen in years, I have a much greater appreciation for the humor that the writers infuse into every scene.
If the adults now go and look back at children cartoons they grew up watching, they can see that there were some points at which their childhood cartoon character did something which isn’t meant for a young mind, following are some examples; Showed in the picture above is a snapshot from the show Edd, Ed & Eddy as you can see Edd has a collection of a few magazines which are not for kids below a certain age, this picture tells us how even kids cartoons have some adult references Another adult reference in the show “Johnny Bravo” where a sexual reference is given by a girl being blindfolded in a children’s game This here is something that everyone will get, Rugrats which is only for young kids, Grandpa tells the kids that he’s going to watch something, after they fall asleep. This refers to an adult movie.
Many audiences of stand up comedy enjoy hearing their favorite comedian entertain them. But what would one think when a comedian cracks a joke about a sensitive topic, for example, a tragedy that affected hundreds of people. Some may argue that, comedians are not supposed to overstep the boundary of controversial jokes. These controversial jokes are linked with political correctness—which is used to describe language, policies, and measures that are taken to avoid offense to certain groups of people. Comedians are not compelled to restrain from controversial topics due to the topic not being sugar-coated, the higher level of contemplation that the joke can reach, and the job of the comedian—to make the current issue manageable.