The Grapes of Wrath: Family Separation
The Dust Bowl migration in the United Stated was a historical period of time when families from the midwest would pack up everything they owned and head west to find work in the 1930’s. Along with taking everything they could, families would try to stick together. In John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck demonstrates the inevitable separation between families while migrating to the west. Some readers may argue that Steinbeck’s theme of The Grapes of Wrath was to unify families as they struggle to migrate west, but he mainly displays separation within families as their journey goes on. Families try to stick together as best as they can. Ma tries continually to keep the family united even under
…show more content…
“All we got is the family unbroke. Like a bunch a cows, when the lobos are ranging, stick all together. I ain’t scared while we’re all here, all that’s alive, but I ain’t gonna see us bust up. The Wilsons here is with us, an’ the preacher is with us. I can’t say nothin’ if they want to go, but I’m a-goin’ cat-wild with this here piece a bar-arn if my own folks busts up” (Steinbeck 231). Ma does not want the family to break no matter what. She is afraid of the people or obstacles that the remaining family members will suffer the consequences if the rest of the family is not present. “I’m a-prayin. You got to keep clear, Tom. The fambly’s breakin’ up. You got to keep clear” (Steinbeck 381). Ma needs Tom to keep his composure for the family’s sake. After the second fight with the deputy, Ma snaps. “‘Tom! They’s a whole lot I don’ un’erstan’. But goin’ away ain’t gonna ease us. It’s gonna bear us down.’ And she went on, ‘They was the time when we was on the lan’. They was a boundary to us then. Ol’ folks died off, an’ little fellas come, an’ we was always one thing- we was fambly-kinda whole and clear. An’ now we ain’t clear no more. I can’t get straight. They ain’t nothin’ keeps us clear’” (Steinbeck 536). Ma realizes that family is no longer a whole anymore. While migrating to California, the Joads face the inevitable reality of splitting up. The Joad family packed up everything they could to re-locate to the West, but they lost just more than their belongings, they lost each other. The Dust Bowl Migration had a negative impact on families who tried to find work in the
“You crazy son-of-a-bitch. You keep me in hot water all the time.”’ “‘Jus’ wanted to feel that girl’s dress…”’ His anger left him suddenly. He looked across the fire at Lennie’s anguished face, and then he looked ashamedly at the flames” (Steinbeck 11).
They got no family. They don’t belong no place. They come to a ranch an’ work up a stake and then they go inta town and blow their stake, and the first thing you know they’re poundin’ their tail on some other ranch. They aint got nothing to look ahead to” (Steinbeck 13).
Although loved ones mean well, they do not always know what is best. Jeannette's family is constantly on the move. The
While an open form of dialogue emphasizes a connection and openness of situation it also lacks a specific aspect that can make it hard to understand. This lack of information is balanced with the Joad family whose interactions give more depth to Steinbeck’s representation of the Great Depression. The balance between a broader and specific description and portrayal of experiences create a more complete story that has a better chance of connecting with the
“I’m gonna get him. I’m going for my shotgun. I’ll kill the big son-of-a-bitch myself. I’ll Shoot ‘im in the guts. Come on, you guys” (Steinbeck 96).
The dust bowl was a frightening time for most people during the 1930s. severe drought and a failure to apply dryland farming methods to prevent wind erosion. The Dust Bowl negatively affected people who lived there in a personal way. During the Dust Bowl a lot families and people had to migrate to a different state.
Along the road the Joad family has to put aside their innate humanness in order to survive and make it to California. Mae and the other diners actions support the idea that the migrants are misunderstood by those who are not struggling in the same manner. Mae labels the people coming into the diner, not truly understanding any of them, and notes how the rich are just as unhappy as the poor migrants. According to Mae, “..the worried eyes are never calm, and the pouting mouth is never glad... An’ the bigger the care they got, the more they steal-towels,silver,soap dishes.
This is what is lost in the society. There is no care or love for the family members. When Montag was sick and he wanted some peace and quiet, he asked Mildred, “‘Will you turn the parlor off?’ he asked. ‘That’s my family’”
I got no kids. They’ll jus’ put me in jail, an’ I ain’t doing nothin’ but set aroun’.” (Steinbeck 363) During a fight with a labor recruiter and a sheriff, Casy gladly sacrifices himself for the well-being of the
Since the book came out in 1939, everyone has had a opinion on the ending to John Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath. It has a very controversial ending, that Steinbeck thought would name the last nail into the coffin, so to speak, on how bad the dust bowl and moving west really was. The ending starts when the Joad family is threatened with a flood, so they make their way to a old barn where they find a boy and his old father. The boy says his father is starving, and that he can’t keep anything solid down. He needs something like soup or milk.
The tone of chapter 11 in John Steinbeck's, “The Grapes of Wrath,” is sympathetic, sad and hopeless. His word choice and syntax show how the sad houses were left to decay in the weather. His use of descriptive words paints a picture in the reader's mind. As each paragraph unfolds, new details come to life and adds to the imagery. While it may seem unimportant, this intercalary chapter shows how the effects of the great depression affected common households.
Another dominant precedent of John Steinbeck’s use of influential language is the rhetorical question. Throughout the story John Steinbeck is questioning the morals and right doings of the congress. Steinbeck uses the rhetorical question to again question congress, “Surely Congress has the right to ask me anything on any subject. The question is: Should Congress take advantage of that right?” (ll. 14-15).
Never you mind,' said Slim. ' A guy got to sometimes'” (107). Here, Steinbeck uses the
Through John Steinbeck's plot in The Grapes of Wrath, the struggle of the typical American dreamer is depicted in the Joad’s attempt to move to California for a better life. While attempting this dream, the Joad family had to make multiple sacrifices. The first sacrifice occurs early on in their journey, the abandoning of their property (Steinbeck 59). This was extremely difficult for the Joads because they had lived on this land for a long time and they had many memories that had been created there.
In The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, the chapters alternate between two perspectives of a story. One chapter focuses on the tenants as a whole, while the other chapter focuses specifically of a family of tenants, the Joads, and their journey to California. Chapter 5 is the former and Steinbeck does an excellent job of omniscient third person point of view to describe the situation. Chapter 5’s main idea is to set the conflict and let the readers make connections between Steinbeck’s alternating chapters with foreshadowing. Steinbeck is effectual in letting readers make connections both to the world and the text itself with the use of exposition, and symbolism.