Singapore’s government is working towards a nation to highlight the importance of families in the society, particularly, in the rising of emerging family trends such as the change of family structure, extensive family pressure and the increasing number of families encountering different and complicated issues (Philomin, Laura Elizabeth 2015). These trends might be caused by economic, social and educational factors.
Firstly, the emerging of family trend can be caused by the economic factor. For the second year running, Singapore has been crowned as the world’s most expensive city according to a survey conducted by Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) (Williams, Ann 2015). Singapore was also compared to New York in terms of the cost of basic groceries,
…show more content…
In the report, it stated that Singapore topped as the world’s most comprehensive education rankings and Singapore led the Asia region (Tang, Ameilia 2015). The credit is due to the country’s planning effort to prioritize education which allows to the country to progressively move on to a prosperous country. However, this may be backfiring on having families as the younger generations would want to focus and prioritize their education and career first. Hence, it will delay the plans of having families or may remain single forever. In addition, according to an article from Straits Times (Goy, Priscilla 2015), there has been a rise of single-person household and married couple household who do not have any children or living by themselves – in 2000, it used to be one in five but in 2014, it became one in …show more content…
As mentioned earlier, the government would need to review their current policies to adjust to these changes as to suit the need of the people living in Singapore. The policies would also need to be flexible yet firm and clear with its decisions. Next, we can look into the employer level. Employer should also be flexible with their companies’ rules and regulation. They can implement family-friendly values which allow their employees to manage both their personal and working duties. Lastly, it can be narrowed down to families and individual. They should be more opened to discuss family problems among themselves. If they require further help, they could seek professional assistance through some agencies. Thus, everyone plays an important role towards the trend and through their efforts, Singapore will be able to resolve such trend and keep moving
Some of the children need the undivided attention of the families and when
Jean Bethke Elshtain presents a critical perspective about the deteriorating state of the family in contemporary society in her article, “Society's Well-Being Depends upon the Traditional Family”. By employing rhetorical strategies of ethos, logos, and pathos, the author constructs a persuasive case that calls for renewed focus on the family as the fundamental unit of society. Elshtain builds her argument through a combination of rhetorical strategies, including the use of ethos, logos, and pathos. Each of these elements contributes to her overall argument and the extent to which her rhetoric succeeds in convincing readers of the urgency in addressing the challenges faced by the family unit.
Today we ask ourselves, what defines a family? Will we ever be able to pinpoint one exact answer? Meanings and explanations of our past have been rightfully challenged. The family structures and dynamics that we see today have evolved great lengths from what they once were in the 1950’s. The 1950’s consisted of “standard” families.
Moreover, this is because, “women are more likely to have a relational orientation than men” (Campos, Aquilera, Ullman, & Schetter, 2014, p. 192). Women are usually the ones that maintain the family bonds and benefit more of the closeness and support from the family. Nevertheless, women still feel more compromised of keeping the bond, and if an issue surges they are more likely to stress due to the conflict (Campos, Aquilera, Ullman, & Schetter, 2014). • Around the world, it appears familism is coming to an end. What are the economic, political and cultural implications of the changes underway in the traditional family unit?
While family structure has changed dramatically since the 1950’s, what current changes are we seeing; and how is it affecting the roles to which we play in a compromising world. In the 1950’s families consisted of a head of household (the Father), the house wife (or mother); and their offspring (the children). The father’s duty was to bring home the bacon, while making end meets for his family, while the wife stayed home and cared for the children, the elderly; and took on the household duties. These families usually lived in the suburbs, where they raised their children; while teaching them the proper ways of life. During this time in history, young women were expected to find a mate through persuasion, then get hitched; and eventually produce an offspring.
The impact of ethnic background and education level on parents parenting style been a topic of interest to both developmental and family psychologists. This intense interest stems from the fact that a person’s parenting style is so intimately intertwined the culture they were exposed to. Ethnic variation in parenting style is almost universal. Numerous studies have investigated parenting in a very diverse set of countries, each with its own value systems, using parenting styles derived from Baumrind 's work as the measure. All of these studies have shown that authoritative parenting is the most consistently parenting style associated with the best psychosocial development and mental health development across cultures (textbook).
This instils a sense of fairness among the employees and keeps them happy. Work life balance: a. Family friendly policy- The parents (both mother and father) get two month long paid parental leave. During this the parents can travel with their child and the company pays for a child development teacher as a part of ‘travelling baby’ program. This helps them reducing absenteeism and helps the company retain workers, most importantly woman.
Young people today are being irresponsible by delaying the rituals of adult life, because they are wasting their precious young years by delaying being responsible for themselves, taking care of themselves, and starting their own life for example, their own family. Young people today are lazy and many are not able to support themselves, because they depend on someone else to take care of them. But young people should understand that they are going to have to be on their own one day, and will not know how sustain themselves if they don’t start learning how to become an independent. Young people today take a longer time to mature and take on the responsibilities of an adult such as getting a good job, and moving out of their parent’s house,
SXU – 1003 – Understanding Society In what way can ‘traditional family’ be viewed as a myth Evidently, as decades have advanced, changing societies in and around the World have had impacts on the way we perceive the dynamics of family social life. Over the last couple of centuries, the overall impact on has lead us into thinking that significant changes could be due to the Global influences such as the World Wars, a changing demographic picture and the Industrial Revolution that driven us to the way we live not just in the UK, but also around the World.
Most people have their own duty such as work hard in the workplace or take care of their families. People think that if they show responsibility to contribute to countries, countries will be progress. However, when people concentrate on their jobs, they might forget to take care of themselves. Some people find a way to relax, in addition to working hard. Otherwise, some people have no choice in reducing stress from their whole lives.
According to Cohen and MacCartney (2004: 181), inequality is related to families and their compositions, because family compositions may be the cause or consequence of various forms of inequality. This paper will touch on four forms of inequality linked to families and their compositions. Firstly, families reflect inequalities, because within society, there is an unequal distribution of various resources ranging from economic, social and political, which can ultimately affect the accessibility of some family forms (Cohen & MacCartney, 2004: 181). For instance, low incomes increase the likelihood that underprivileged people will live with extended families (family group that includes parents, children, relatives, in-laws, friends and other individuals who share an emotional bond), even when they would prefer the privacy of a more secluded group of members, such as those experienced by higher income families and households (Cohen & MacCartney, 2004: 181; Extended family, n.d.:1). Hence, the accessibility of resources varies across families and households, with some having access to more resources in relation to others, which is why inequality has the ability to adversely affect families and households.
This essay discusses how the family is viewed by two different sociological perspectives- functionalism and conflict theory. Firstly, ‘family’ is defined. Secondly, the main ideas of functionalism will be discussed followed by how this theory perceives the family. The main ideas of Conflict Theory will then be examined and how conflict theorists perceive the family.
American Families Today The American family has undergone many changes since the 1900’s. More so, in the past 40 years, the nuclear family seen dramatic changes and has been described as deteriorating. There has been a dramatic rise in divorce, single parent households and child poverty. Studies have shown that children growing up in poverty-stricken single parent households are more likely to be affected well into adulthood. While this is the case, people are also living longer, and families are accommodating this change by living with relatives allowing for more bonding time then in previous generations.
Introduction In this case study, it analyse how the concept of family has changed in the past 20 years as it will be depicting modern family forms and past norms. It is important to look at how families have developed throughout the years up until the 21st century as we compare the two and elaborate on the difference and what makes it so significant. In this case study, it contrast and compare the television series Modern family which is a 21st century concept of family and The Simpsons which was adapted 27 years ago and how things have changed with family dynamics and what is the norm now which was not the norm years ago.
Modern Family is a hilarious sitcom that depicts the diversity of today’s American family and is one of the highest rated comedy shows on TV. The show, which is produced by ABC was a success from the first season with over seven million viewers and grew to more than fourteen million views by season three. The shows underlying message, that there is more than just one kind of family and that we are all crazy is done with a kind humor that is a refreshing change from the modern reality TV we now see on most nights. The comedy combined with diversity and great acting makes this show attracting to a broad range of viewers and proves that everyone loves a good laugh. One reason Modern Family has been a continued success over the years is their dedication to what the show was made to be, a comedy.