Federal Trade Commission Research Paper

Bath, N.Y. (WENY) -- In a few days Thomas Clayton will be sentenced for his role in orchestrating his wife 's death. However on Thursday, the attorney for the convicted murderer made his first motion for a new trial.

The article that I chose is Improving Cultural Competence to Reduce Health Disparities for priority Populations. This topic is relevant to social work because it is talking about cultural competence in the health care system and the one major skill that social workers need is cultural competency. This article is also relevant to social work because it talks about the importance of cultural competence in reducing disparities through culturally sensitive and unbiased quality care and since the social work field is all about treating everyone equally and fairly, this article falls right under its relevance. It continues to talk about programs to improve the knowledge of providers on cultural competency and general approaches that have been utilized in creating educational interventions to address cultural competence. This is great because social workers are never done learning, it is always important to train social worker on how to be culturally competent, specially because the populations being served are very diverse therefore, there should always be a way to train service providers on how to have cultural awareness.

How do we know what is true? How do we know if a man sentenced to death was truly a murderer? A question echoed by thousands of people revolting against the death penalty as the story of Todd Willingham made it to the headlines. In The New Yorker, under the title of Trial by Fire, came the terrifying enigma: “Did Texas execute an innocent man?” followed by a thorough listing of the evidence that was used to convict Willingham of setting his house on fire and resulting in the death of his three children, and how they were later disproved.

A = Analysis                                                                                                                                             A.           Miller Brewing Company strived to claim the generic word "Lite" in marketing advertisements, to differentiate themselves from any and all brewing companies including Falstaff from misrepresentation.

The case that I will be talking about today is the case of POM Wonderful LLC vs Coca-Cola Company in which POM Wonderful felt that Coca-Cola was using false advertising to promote its own drink to sell to customers. POM Wonderful makes its own fruits to be used in their fruit chooses and they sell a drink that is made of 100 percent fruit juices with 85 percent being pomegranate juice and the other 15 percent blueberry juice. Coca-Cola also make a juice drink through the Minute Maid division of their company with the label saying pomegranate blueberry in giant letters. The Coca-Cola juice is made with only 0.3 percent of pomegranate juice and 0.2 percent of blueberry juice along with 0.1 percent of raspberry juice and 99.4 percent of a combination of apple and grape juices. The focus of the complaint was that the Coca-Cola juice label had the words pomegranate and blueberry in all capital letters and then underneath that the words got smaller and explained that it was a “flavored blend of 5 juices” and that it was made “from concentrate with added ingredients” (Cheeseman). POM stated that Coca-Cola was in violation of the Lanham Act which is a federal law prohibiting false advertising and unfair competition laws. Pom challenged that the name, labeling, marketing, and advertising of Coca Cola’s pomegranate blueberry juice drink (Oyez.org).

Out of all the genre of writing, Satire is the one that speaks the most to people because it is humorous. Satire is making fun of some aspect of culture, society or human nature, human voice through the use of ridicule, mockery, irony, humor, or other methods to hopefully improve it or inspire some sort change. Satire often uses laughter as a weapon against something that exists outside the world itself. One of the most leading satire website that we have today is The Onion. One of the leading articles that the Onion had published is the best example of satire. The untitled article from the Onion uses many satirical strategies like hyperbole, irony, as well as unfamiliar diction to the consumer, to satirize people’s willingness to believe in well-marketed products even if they are ineffective.

The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim. The appellant’s essential accommodation claim went to trial, but court excluded evidence regarding disability. The plaintiff is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However, the issue should have been decided by the jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

Through years of gender inequality throughout the nation, one of the most important causes for women was when they received the right to vote, as it allowed them to have a voice within the country. While looking throughout the fight for Women’s Suffrage, many would say that it ultimately ended on August 26, 1920- when the 19th Amendment was officially ratified. Although this seems accurate, many others would say that the fight ended when the Supreme Court 's ruling ultimately established the Nineteenth Amendment. This is best shown by the ratification of the 19th amendment, Leser v. Garnett, and the overall process to reach the final ruling during the case.

This reform was the cornerstone of President Wilson’s New freedom program. The unending corruption of big organizations and their non-compliance with the Sherman Anti-Trust Act prompted the President to press for enactment of this Act. The FTC comprised of five members whose powers included the ability to define the “Unfair Trade practices” and issue “cease and desist” orders when there was evidence of corrupt Anti-Trust practices. These members were vested with more powers to combat unjust trade practices and monopolies. Closely associated with the Federal Trade Commission and Anti-Trust Act is the Clayton Anti-Anti-Trust Act in 1914. This act was enacted to clarify and define what constituted “monopolistic” activities. It protected the activities of labor unions and prohibited directors from serving in boards of competing

The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 declared the president could remove the five commissioners he appointed by and with the advice and consent

The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim. The appellant’s essential accommodation claim went to trial, but court excluded evidence regarding disability. The plaintiff is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However, the issue should have been decided by the jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

The Standard Oil Company, founded in 1870, was one of the most notable companies in American history. Its success was unprecedented, and its effects on the American economy and way of business were powerful and lasting. Founded and expanded by John D. Rockefeller, the Standard Oil Company absorbed almost all other oil companies in the country and consolidated all of them under one “trust.” It then chartered several smaller branches in different states, such as New Jersey, in order to monopolize the oil industry and create an oil empire. Though the Standard Oil Company was very controversial and its dissolution was ultimately seen as a triumph, it was also a positive force in many ways, both in the short

The Federal Trade Commission began in 1915 and is a commission made up of five appointed commissioners - three of which is of one political party and the other two, another. These commissioners serve a term of seven years with the FDC. The role of the FDC is to uphold the lawful methods of commerce between businesses/corporations and organizations and to investigate any unfair methods of competition leading up to court

Deceptive advertising is known as false advertising. It is an unlawful act made by various parties of a specific good or service to inaccurately advertise their product, through false or misleading statements (Drake, 2011). Advertisers should strongly evade advertisements that have the ability to deceive, regardless the fact that nobody may be deceived (Kotler et al., 2013). Consumers have the right to know what service or product they are purchasing. Therefore, false advertising is seen as unlawful in various nations (Consumer.laws.com, 2016).

In the essay “Shakespeare’s sister” Virginia Woolf asks and explores the basic question of “Why women did not write poetry in the Elizabethan age”. Woolf sheds light on the reality of women’s life during this time and illustrates the effects of social structures on the creative spirit of women. In the society they lived in, women were halted to explore and fulfill their talent the same way men were able to, due to the gender role conventions that prevailed during this era. Through a theoretical setting in which it is it is imagined that William Shakespeare had a sister (Judith), Virginia Woolf personifies women during the sixteenth century in order to reflect the hardships they had to overcome as aspiring writers.