ipl-logo

Federalism: Disaster Response In Puerto Rico

1247 Words5 Pages

Chapter Application
November 8, 2017

Chapter 4: Federalism
Article: Davis Aaron C., Lamothe Dan, and O'Keefe Ed. “U.S. response in Puerto Rico pales next to actions after Haiti quake”. The Washington Post. September 28, 2017

On September 20th, Hurricane Maria ravaged the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico which resulted in an emergency situation for several million American citizens. Since Maria struck the island, there has been a disconnect between the level of aid requested or provided and the needs of struggling citizens who are desperate for water, food and the basic necessities of life as reported by Aaron C. Davis, Dan Lamothe and Ed O'Keefe of the Washington Post. In an article entitled “U.S. response in Puerto Rico pales next to actions …show more content…

Some may believe that disaster aid should be of utmost importance to the federal government while other citizens may argue that government spending on natural disasters should remain a state and local concern. This polarity of rationale proves useful as several approaches to Federalism are examined in response to the general welfare of our fellow citizens resulting from a natural disaster. The text compares the two theories of Federalism, Dual Federalism and Cooperative Federalism, and highlights how the Constitution is used to define the relationship between the federal and state governments. Under Dual Federalism, the functions and responsibilities of each government system are clearly differentiated (Janda, et al). Several key factors highlight the functioning of this theory. First, the federal government rules under enumerated powers which Janda et al. defines as “the powers explicitly granted to congress by the constitution” (Janda, et al). Powers not explicitly covered remain with the states meaning that much of the local concerns rest in the states sphere of authority. Although advocates of state’s rights may find this favorable, it can also be a disadvantage for citizens if their local and state governments are unable to provide the necessary resources to get through a difficult situation. Second, the Constitution grants the national government limited purpose. This restricts the amount of support the Federal government is able to grant due to the narrow interpretation of its responsibilities. Disaster aid is not mentioned and therefore would not be a purpose of national concern based on this theory. Third, national and state governments are both recognized as sovereign within its jurisdiction. The division of powers that restricts each government entity also grants power. Lastly, tensions define divide the relationship

Show More
Related

  • Dual Federal Government Research Paper

    410 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the governments “creation” in 1776 when the united states separated from Brittan’s monarchial government, there has been substantial change in the powers of state and national government. From 1788-1937 power was divided strictly between state and national government, also known as Dual-Federalism. Under this, the power of the state government is greater than the power of the national government. Sometimes referred to as layer cake federalism, because the powers lay on top of each other but don’t intermingle. This was not favorable because there was a fear of northern dominance.

    Read More

  • Essay On How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

    465 Words  | 2 Pages

    When states powers are separate and different from the Government's’ powers prevents tyranny by separating the powers between the Central Government and the State Government. Also if the Government's had all powers, then the states wouldn’t have any freedom, which is what America was built for.

    Read More

  • Summary: The Lessons Of Civil Defense Federalism For The Homeland Security Era

    922 Words  | 4 Pages

    a spawned complaints,” (Roberts, 2014, p. 355). From what that was saying is that civil defense was more successful while Homeland Security was a failure for the use federalism. For the contrast both Civil Defense and Homeland Security are used for safety to protect people from natural

    Read More

  • Using Checks And Balances Against Tyranny

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalism makes both central and state governments more equal in power. Source 2 explains how central and state governments are different, though also what common powers they have. This showing how the national government isn't too strong but also the state government is not too strong as well. Meaning both governments have powers and share powers but not too much, this protecting against tyranny. Source 1 states “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [state and federal],” Therefore state and national governments are suppose to be different and do different governments so they can check one another and share

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is evident in document A, where it shows you a Venn diagram of which powers are given to the states and which powers are given to the federal government. For one thing, this shows how “a double security arises to the rights of the people”, which means that when the power is distributed between the states and the federal government, neither is able to gain absolute power over the country. Federalism also comes in handy by specifying what the states get to control and what the national government gets to control, which is meant to prevent conflict between the two powers. For example, the task of declaring war is meant for the national government only. If that wasn’t specified, there would likely be a lot of cases where states declared war, and the national government had to clean up the mess.

    Read More

  • Framers Of The Constitution Dbq

    1017 Words  | 5 Pages

    Although some Supreme Court cases have helped to explicitly establish some powers of the national government, there are many spheres where states make decisions on their own and some aspects in which the national and federal government coincide. The “picket fence” refers to the overlap of national and states’ rights and how they work collectively on these issues. Even though the national government is a powerful entity, it is still kept in check by the states and by its various branches. Rather than having very outlined restrictions, the states and national government work together for the bettering of the nation. Also, the national government has allowed states to keep autonomy with block grants, which allow them to choose how to spend their funds to better assist their citizens.

    Read More

  • Necessary And Proper Clauses

    866 Words  | 4 Pages

    The vast power of the federal government has been on the rise, crippling the state’s authority. In the early 1800’s there have been cases where the Supreme Court has ruled, for the most part, in the federal government’s benefit. With the Legislative and Judicial Branches making up 2/3 of the federal government’s power, many could speculate the two powers are working to strengthen the federal government. However, the ruling was based off of Necessary and Proper Clause, where it is said that Congress (Legislative Branch) has the authority “to find the great powers, to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce; and to declare and conduct a war.” When the states interfere it causes the Judicial Branch to step in and decide what

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    1065 Words  | 5 Pages

    Federalism a system of government in which power is divided, by a constitution, between a central government and regional governments. The Constitution restricts the power of the states in favor of ensuring enough power to the national government to give the country s free-flowing national economy. The framers’ concern with the national concern with national supremacy was also expressed

    Read More

  • Unfunded Federal Mandate

    2258 Words  | 10 Pages

    Since its beginning, the United States of America has gradually and steadily expanded the oversight and power of its own federal government. This expansion has resulted in a plethora of effects on the relationship between local state government and the federal government, both negative and positive. However, the increased impingement from the federal government onto the constitutional rights of local and state governments has created an imbalance. A major part of this imbalance has stemmed from the advent and imposition of unfunded federal mandates. This increasing implementation of unfunded federal mandates over the years has begun to stir up trouble between the states and the federal government.

    Read More

  • Informative Speech On Puerto Rico

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    Conclusion = Summary of important facts reviewed during the main points of the speech • Puerto Rico took a break from Spain in 1898 claiming some independence • United States did not hesitate to step in and kick Spain out • Years later the US and PR were engaged under the Jones Act making. No wedding date has been set. 8.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    1823 Words  | 8 Pages

    This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Puerto Rico

    1390 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Land of the Free… Well, Except Puerto Rico Whenever Americans think of Puerto Rico, they tend to think first of the beautiful Caribbean vacation destination. Whenever Puerto Ricans think of their island, they see the years of mistreatment and hardship that the island has endured. Puerto Rico has been the property of other countries for nearly five hundred years, but that does not give the United States a right to continue to ignore it. Puerto Rico’s status as a United States commonwealth keeps citizens from playing a part in fixing the political issues within the island. Without representation in the United States federal government nor political independence, Puerto Rico is powerless and silent.

    Read More

  • Puerto Rico Hurricane Impacts

    720 Words  | 3 Pages

    In October, President Donald Trump signed a relief bill to help rebuild areas of the country damaged by natural disasters this fall, including up to $4.9 billion in loans to help Puerto Rico’s cash-strapped central government (Connelly Holmes, 2017). This help would significantly help Puerto Rico in the long term, but short term it did little as the bureaucracy took over. The agencies that wanted to help were stuck because of bidding on government contracts and red tape from the federal government. Private businesses and citizens decided to take things into their own hands to help Puerto

    Read More

  • Puerto Rican Statehood In The United States

    1962 Words  | 8 Pages

    social status as well. The relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States is not what the U.S. represents. The country was founded on the principle embedded in our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The situation with Puerto Rico has been a disgrace to the United States social platform because for Puerto Rico to meet its economic and social challenges and to achieve its full potential, this debate over statehood must be settled. The current relationship undermines the United States’ moral standing in the world (114th Congress, 2015).

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Stafford Act

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our system of federalism is written into our Constitution with the forethought that our government would be built on the idea that no single part of government would have all the power. Therefore, it created a system with checks and balances that monitor the separate parts of the administration. This separation of power is also built into our states and local governments. Seemingly, the Stafford Act illustrates these same ideas through each level of government and how they should act in an emergency or a major disaster to save lives and protect property.

    Read More

More about Federalism: Disaster Response In Puerto Rico

Open Document