The devastating World Wars in Europe and their implications after 1945 have led many scientists to study the integration process. However, there was the question of whether the community is a new political system, and will its further development bring the loss of national sovereignty. For a long time, European integration took place without strong central governance, but at the same time it made serious progress. In 2000, German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer did not eliminate that in the future the European Union (EU) will become a Federation . The process of ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in the EU member states allowed again talking about the desire of heads of associations to strengthen the role of supranational government. This …show more content…
Started appearing scientific schools, which engaged in the problems of unification of Europe and tried to prove the doom of the nation-state and the need for a new European and world order. In this area, one of the most important researches in the 1920’s and last century was the book by Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi called "Paneurope", first published in 1923 . In this model, a federal pan-European constitution had to provide the unification of Europe. During this period, the idea of unification of the European continent was discussed among politicians. After World War II, various scientific schools developed their activities in this direction, especially the school of …show more content…
The final result of European integration is quality of the model of the member state. Also, supranational institutions should be created, to which the Member states will transfer part of their sovereignty. Federalism is chosen as an ideological basis of the future unification, which allows adequate distribution of the sources of legitimacy and power between different levels of government, such as between regional, national and supranational. To the citizens of the state is given the same role as to nation-state. They choose all levels of government that are above them and receive from the Union government their primary identity – the equal rights and equal to each other citizens of the Union. Federalists don't consider the integration of the Union, which operates only on the basis of intergovernmental cooperation. In their point of view, an obligatory feature of integration is the availability of centralized government. Accordingly, the maturity of any integration group is estimated depending on what part of the decisions is made at the supranational level. It should be noted that, in the context of European integration - the supporters of federalist theory considered the unification of Europe as only possibility of preserving peace and security on the continent. According to
At the end of World War II, Western European powers sought political stability after a period of turmoil and devastation. Germany was divided into two spheres of influence: East Germany, controlled by the Soviet Union, and West Germany, controlled by the Allies. Western Europe attempted to unify in the post-war economy, and various views arose regarding this potential unity. The unification of Western Europe was met with opinions that were largely motivated by a nation’s own economic and political interests.
There is a great deal of risk in the strategy spoken by President Reagan because of the imbalance between ends, ways and means. Lykke provides a conceptual framework and vocabulary for describing risk in strategy in his “three-legged stool” model. His main point is that a balanced strategy is solid, but if ends, ways, or means are not aligned, the strategy incurs risk (Reading C203 D, p. 4). In the spoken strategy there is especially an imbalance between the ends, ways and means to the desired end of a unified and free Europe. The ways in the strategy is only directed towards the city of Berlin.
The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational
When political sciences look at federalism there is two main models the dual and cooperative. Dual is the theory about the proper relationship between the states and the national government. It is has four major parts the first is that the national government only rules by enumerated powers. Number two is that the national government has a limited amount of constitutional purposes. Third both government national, and state is sovereign within its sphere.
A nation would be unable to unite under these circumstances. Federalists believed in the power of a president instead of a monarch serving for life. A president would also be fairly elected by the people to serve the country for 4 years, giving the people a choice to replace or keep the current president.
As our nation began to grow more political views began to be presented. One of the main issues during the 1800’s was that some citizens thought that the states should have authority over the federal government, and should be allowed to leave or join the Union whenever they felt like it. Once states started trying to leave, they created a huge crisis in the political world. This create open debates and court cases that evaluated the stance and authority in which the states had. These arguments became known as the “Nature of the Union”.
Did the EU’s goal of shared peace between lots of different cultures and people work out? The European Union, also known as the EU is a supranational organization that consists of 28 different countries. The EU was made to bring together countries that were torn apart by the war and to create peace between those countries. The EU works toward shared goals and issues yet remain separate countries all the same. The benefits of being a member in the European Union does not outweigh the costs due to loss of sovereignty, social unrest and peace, economic issues, and cultural identity with the diversity of languages and cultures.
Since the end of the American Civil War, Federalism has been a very important idea in the United States. Federalism has appeared in many instances within different governmental ideas. The original idea of Federalism gave up states’ rights and handed them to the government to create a more centralized federal system. Over time Federalism has had many views by different leaders in our government. These viewpoints began with Ronald Reagan’s idea of “New-Federalism,” and carried on throughout time involving the Violence Against Women Act and more recently the urge to modify the Affordable Care Act.
The Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century changed the European working lifestyles from agrarian to urban. This change of lifestyle happened very quickly, and left thousands of lower class working citizens in poverty. Throughout the nineteenth century several different arguments were made on how to improve the lives of European workers. Arguments made to improve the lives of European workers include: having a stronger government, giving more rights to the working class, turning towards a socialistic government, or simply maintaining the status quo. Documents 3, 7, and 9 claim that having a more involved government will improve living conditions for workers.
Edwards and Wattenberg define Federalism as, “a way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government share formal authority over the same area and people. (Edwards and Wattenburg,70)” When the United States first started to form a central government their objective was to never allow for a dominating power to take over the country again. To do so they created a division of power and made it possible for states and more so the “people” the right to have more of an impact on government. Or so were their intended thoughts when creating the constitution and the branches. In doing so their focus constrained national government but left a loose string as to what the states and their constitutions could do.
In this edition of the Federalist papers, Alexander Hamilton stresses over and over again the importance of unity between the states. Without unity, it seems as though our country will cease to exist as we know it. While Hamilton does not come right out and state, we need unity, he does make his point very clear. In using the Constitution as the perfect example of what the United States needed at the time, Hamilton manages to bring everything back to one central theme. We cannot have unity between the states if we do not introduce the Constitution.
The European Union is a strong force to reckon with, mainly because of the vast amount of resources it controls. The EU has put in place institutions and policy-making powers to react to or shape economic conditions on the continent. The adoption of the euro and the monetary union further impart strength to this international alliance of powerful countries. Many scholars have suggested parallels between the EU and other international organizations like the UN. They claim that these organizations will make the world converge into a state much like the European Union.
.5 MAASTRICHT TREATY The Maastricht Treaty, marked in 1992 and authoritatively known as the Treaty on European Union (TEU), presented a few imperative increments and alterations to the Treaty of Rome and flagged a progress in European combination rose to just by the 1986 Single European Act. Its focal elements were the consolidation of EMU into the Treaty of Rome and the foundation of the European Union by the expansion of two new fields of approach co-operation: the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and Justice and Home Affairs (JHA). These new zones were figured as intergovernmental commitments, instead of obligations of the Community 's supranational affiliations, a game-plan which was to a confined degree balanced in this way in the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam, where the Community was given to a more prominent degree a section in giving methodology rules and certain parts of JHA were traded to go under the expertise of the Commission and the Court of Justice.