ipl-logo

Federalist Theoretical Analysis

486 Words2 Pages

In the federalist papers, Madison is basically pointing out that to maintain a peaceful society diversity needs to be encouraged. He is stating that not one sect or pair of sects should have full control. He is encouraging diversity between interest and classes of citizens. He feels that this will solve the never ending political problems of despotism and violent factionalism. I agree with his solution to this problem I believe it would reduce violence between factions and prevent one from having too much power over the others. “Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed union, none deserves to be more accurately developed, than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction.”(No. 10, page 42). According

Show More
Related

  • Federalist 10 Dbq

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Madison's Three Compromises

    403 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Federalist 10 Madison addresses the issue of political factions, or parties, and how they are a problem, and how to deal with them. Madison describes factions as like minded people who come together to impose their views on others. The first method Madison proposes is to remove the causes that make the faction, and the second being by controlling its effects. In order to do those things Madison says that we must destroy liberty, and give everyone the same opinions, passions and the interests respectfully. Neither of these ideas would work however because if you destroy liberty just because it gives rise to factions, you would be destroying something that is good just because it has a small side effect that can be seen as

    Read More

  • Dbq Federalist 10

    1552 Words  | 7 Pages

    Madison suggests removing the problem of faction “by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence (book).” He then goes on to say right after that in the fifth paragraph that destroying liberty would not work because it defeats the purpose of creating a free society and in the sixth paragraph he calls it impractical (need to cite?). Calling it impractical is a good point because if someone were to try and take liberty from everyone people would revolt and fight for their rights and possibly become more set in their faction which is the opposite of what they want. “Liberty is to faction what air is to fire” what Madison means is that wanting to get rid of liberty because of factions is like trying to get rid of air because it fuels fire, and without air we would die(book). The other thing Madison states in his first argument is the idea of “giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests (book).

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Federalist No. 10 James Madison

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    Madison believes that these factions are beneficial for the republic only if they can be managed. He implies that

    Read More

  • James Madison's Essay 'Federalist No. 10'

    417 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, wrote his essay “Federalist No. 10” with the inspiration of the ratification of The Constitution. He starts off by mentioning that one of the most important capabilities of a well-constructed Union is breaking and controlling the violence of faction. Madison adequately defined factions, their causes, and ways to eliminate factions. He also clearly mentioned the role of The Constitution in regulating the effects of factions.

    Read More

  • How The Articles Of Confederation Hindered The Central Government

    843 Words  | 4 Pages

    Under representation of these “chosen body of citizens”, Madison asserted that, “the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves.” The argument of the Constitution on representatives is, when the authority from the people is given to representatives, those representatives make decisions that will safe-guard and protect the liberty of the people. Contrary to what Madison had insisted the Constitution would do under representatives, anti-federalist views presume the liberties of the people are jeopardized when their authority is placed into the hands of people that share no common interests with you. Enclosed in Brutus III, the question is asked, “what security therefore can there be for the people, where their liberties and property are at the disposal of so few men?” To inhibit the absence of connection between representatives and the people, the Constitution, Madison claimed, “forms a happy combination in this respect; the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures”.

    Read More

  • Federalism Dbq Essay

    834 Words  | 4 Pages

    In times of struggle for an organized and protective government, fifty five delegates were called to ratify the amendments. The Unites States was a brand new, independent nation, but it was not at all prospering. War debt and the inability of congress to tax led to the realization that the government needed to be reformed. While it was not their original intention, these delegates ultimately created the Constitution of the United States of America. However, the constant fear of one man or group obtaining too much power still loomed.

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.

    Read More

  • The Anti Federalists Argument Analysis

    123 Words  | 1 Pages

    Though a small republic can 't resist the mischief of faction, there is a way for a large republic to be able to resist. In small republics the number of people is a low amount, as for large republics the number of people is higher and there is a difference of opinions. The fact that large republics have a more numerous amount of people this means that the factions will be numerous as well and will also be smaller and weaker. Because they have so many different factions it is very easy for the government to just ignore them. It is stated in the handout that Madison is refuting, "the Anti-federalists ' argument that a republic would soon crumble under the pressure of factional divisions."

    Read More

  • Essay On The Federalists

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison, founding father and fourth president of United States wrote the federalists paper number 10 in favor of the constitution. He believes that constitution is the only way to keep balance and control any problem this country faces. He uses faction as an example and talks about how it can cause problems but most importantly how to deal with the problems. He defines faction as groups of people who came together to promote their own interests and opinions. He said that these groups take advantage of the public and violate their rights.

    Read More

  • Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    If we do not win this debate, our liberation from Great Britain would have been pointless. I support the Antifederalist for this exact reason. We need a Bill Of Right to protect us from the government crushing hand. The Federalist want us to go along with a promise! Just a set of pretty words and an system of checks and balances!

    Read More

  • The Conformity Of The Federalists

    350 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1787, a final draft of the Constitution was submitted to the states for ratification. Those who were in favor of the ratification were called Federalist or nationalist. Among these federalists, were James Madison of Virginia, John Jay of New York and Alexander Hamilton. They had a concrete proposal. They wrote a collection of 85 essays defending the principle of a strong national government.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Federalist Paper

    273 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another collection of famous American writings is the Federalist Papers. Written by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, there is proof within some of the essays, which supports and agrees with Jefferson’s views toward slavery and equality. Dan Himmelfarb discussed this in The Yale Law Journal in the article “The Constitutional Relevance of the Second Sentence of the Declaration of Independence.” He suggests the authors believed in natural rights for all people but also saw differing rankings as an unfortunate reality. Himmelfarb wrote, “Men are slaves not by nature but by convention or positive law.”

    Read More

  • Madison's Views On Faction Summary

    501 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.

    Read More

  • James Madison Factions

    486 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison expressed that it is impossible to destroy liberty because one cannot make everyone have the same ideologies, so it’s impossible to extinguish factions. Madison expressed that he preferred a small republic over a large republic. With a large republic a representative would have been picked by a big number of citizen in a large republic than in a small republic. In a small republic it would make it more challenging for ineligible candidates to gain a position in

    Read More

More about Federalist Theoretical Analysis

Open Document