ipl-logo

Federalist Vs. Democratic: Republican Party

621 Words3 Pages

The views on Federalist vs. Democratic:Republican Party Are you with the Democratic:Republican or Federalist party? Well there is many differences and similarities. The Federalist are more of a strong federal government and the Democratic:Republican were wanting more of a strong state government. Also, the Federalist were a Loose Interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic:Republican were the opposite, they were Strict Interpretation of the Constitution. A similarity they both had was they were both a government that were different but still trying to follow the Constitution at the same time. Alexander Hamilton thought that collecting tax money should have it’s own little spot. Alexander wanted to build a bank to keep all of the money in. The bank that he would make would allow business people to get loans and build buildings or ships. In order for that to happen he supported the Loose Construction. Another …show more content…

In order for that to happen he would have to get approved first. Hamilton couldn’t just say ‘alrighty let’s build this bank and we can put all the money we have in that bank.’ No, he had to do a lot more work than that. For example he had to go to debates, like we might have today talking about what the bank would be like. The reason why he had to get it approved by Congress is because it wasn’t just going to be his bank. It would be the governments too. After all the work he put into this bank he got approved by Congress in 1791. Alexander Hamilton was going to make the country grow in many different ways. The Republicans probably liked democracy better than the Federalist. Now, the reason for that is because the Republicans didn’t like waiting on the Federalist because they might have taken too long on a decision. Also another reason for that is because they thought the “better people” should have the power. The Democratic:Republicans had a symbol and in that case they were the big

Show More
Related

  • Alexander Hamilton's Financial Plan

    1192 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hamilton ensured that many of the holders of financial dept would be wealthy merchants, so that they had a financial stake in the new governments survival. This caused wealthy merchants to therefore become involved and want the government to be successful due to their financial stake in its future success. The establishment of a central bank was one of Hamilton’s reforms that allowed the American economy to stabilize and thereby establish its own currency . A bank gave the United States the opportunity to print their own currency, so that they would no longer be forced to utilize the British pound. This served as a solution to the United States identity issue, as it no longer identified itself with that of its oppressor’s currency.

    Read More

  • What Is Alexander Hamilton Necessary?

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    The need for a national bank was very much so necessary. Hamilton also convinced president Washington to sign the bank bill by his lengthy report that stated: “This criterion is the end, to which the measure relates as a mean. If the end be clearly comprehended withan any specified powers, collecting taxes and regulating the currency, and if the measure have an obvious relation to that end, and is not forbidden by any particular provision of the constitution, it may safely be deemed to come with the compass of national authority.”

    Read More

  • How Did Hamilton Influence Political Parties

    297 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamilton interpreted the Constitution more loosely and thought a bank was necessary, however Jefferson was against this since the Constitution didn’t give Congress the power to create a Bank. The main three differences between Hamilton and Jefferson were on what should drive the country, government power and the interpretation

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Economic Impact On The United States

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    For example, Madison and other Virginians were concerned about the bank's location since it was located in Philadelphia. This meant that it would interfere with moving the capital. Other people like Hamilton and investors thought that the bank positively impacted the nation since the federal government and nation’s capital markets were more powerful and efficient. All in all, creating a national bank was another major aspect of Hamilton’s economic

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Support Federalism

    703 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, had a vision of a strong national government and a strong national economy. He proposed a multi-facet plan to help the states and federal government out of debt. A large component of this plan was to create a National Bank. Alexander’s plan was strongly opposed by Jefferson’s Party as they found it unconstitutional for Congress to pass this bill to give the federal government control over a National Bank. They feared a strong central government, as active opponents of the English government and argued that giving too much power to the federal government could lead to tyranny.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Federalist Parties

    998 Words  | 4 Pages

    Adams believes that the National Bank is necessary and beneficial to the government. Hamilton proposed this idea because the country needed to pay back war debts. It’s a safe place to deposit tax money and helps support the increase of trade and helps increase the use of paper money. The issue of the National Bank was a big argument in the country, the Federalists wanted to create the bank to help the economy of the United States while the Democratic-Republicans said that creating a bank probably will not make any difference and the power of creating a National Bank is not given to the government by the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, one of the Federalist party leaders stated that: “ ‘Necessary’ often means no more than needful...useful…”

    Read More

  • Political Parties: The Federalists And The Democratic-Republics

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    During Revolutionary America, two political parties came about: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republics. The Federalists believed in supported federal administration and were highly in favor of the Constitution, while the Democratic-Republicans favored the idea of extending the Revolution to everyday people. Their party names reflect their standpoints. The Election of 1796 was the first in American History for candidates running for office to belong to organized political parties.

    Read More

  • How Did The Two Party System Start

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    President George Washington appointed Alexander Hamilton as the Treasury Secretary and Hamilton took it upon himself to develop an economic structure for the United States. Hamilton used a strategy of loose construction for the interpretation of the constitution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Republicans Vs Federalists

    331 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most

    Read More

  • Republicans Vs Federalists

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    Republicans under Thomas Jefferson favored protecting the interest of the working class men including merchants, farmers, and laborers and sought to create an agrarian economy. Jefferson feared the Bank of the Untied States and thought it represented too much English influences and argued that the constitution didn’t give the power to establish a bank. He states in an excerpt about the national bank. “The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States, by the

    Read More

  • What Are The Similarities Between Federalists And Democratic Republicans

    115 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are a lot of things that Federalists and Democratic Republicans have in common so out of all of them these are some that I found on page 292, according to page 292 on the bottom it states that the Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalist. The Federalists where ruled by the wealthy class. They had a strong federal government, they were allies with Britain, they protected tariffs. On the other hand there is the Democratic Republicans. The Democratic Republicans were ruled by the people not just high class or low class like the Federalist but anyone.

    Read More

  • Why Did Alexander Hamilton Sign The New Constitution

    299 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though Hamilton wasn’t one of our presidents, he showed great leadership throughout his terms in the secretary of treasury, he practiced law after the wars, and he also showed leadership being one of our Founding Fathers (who were responsible winning our wars against England.) After Hamilton was drafted for the Constitutional Convention by New Year, Hamilton got to attend a meeting in Philadelphia. While Alexander was in Philadelphia he had little to no impact on the convention because he didn’t fully represent New York. Even though Hamilton didn’t represent the Federalist (who strongly opponents to sign the new constitution), Hamilton signed the new constitution as an individual. Then after Hamilton signed the for the new constitution, he got to write “at least two-thirds of the essays” that included some of the most important ones that would explain the powers of each of the branches.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton Loose Constructionists

    423 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists who believed that if the Constitution didn’t allow something, it was forbidden. Hamilton and the Federalists were loose constructionists who believed that if the Constitution didn’t forbid it, it was allowed. He explained his loose constructionist views in “Hamilton’s Opinion as to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States,” saying, “If the end is clearly found within any of the specific powers, and if the law has an obvious relation to the end, and it is not forbidden by any particular provision of the Constitution, it may safely be deemed to come within the compass of the national authority.” The National Bank held money for the nation, funded the government, and put private and public money together for a capital pool. Hamilton liked the National Bank because it loaned money to

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Transportation Revolution

    1568 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hamilton wanted to create public credit with a treasury system, a national bank, a mint, and increase manufacturing which would help unify the country. On the other hand, there was Jefferson, who opposed a strong central government. He argued that the “wealthy would gain at the expense of ordinary Americans and that Hamilton’s political economy would corrupt the morality of citizens and undermine the social conditions essential to republican government”(Powerpoint). The country would opt for an approach closer to Hamilton’s views. One of the first acts was the National Banking Act.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Jefferson And Hamilton

    1449 Words  | 6 Pages

    Hamilton 's monetary course of action for the nation included working up a national bank like that in England to keep up open credit; cementing the states ' commitments under the focal government; and initiating guarded tolls and government enrichments to empower American makes. These measures fortified the administration 's vitality to the hindrance of the states. Jefferson and his political accomplices limited these progressions. Francophile Jefferson expected that the Bank of the United States addressed an inordinate measure of English effect, and he battled that the Constitution did not give Congress the capacity to set up a bank. He didn 't assume that propelling produces was as basic as supporting the authoritatively settled agrarian base.

    Read More

More about Federalist Vs. Democratic: Republican Party

Open Document