ipl-logo

Federalists: Becoming Too Powered By A Strong National Government

299 Words2 Pages

The Federalists fought for stability and safety supplied by a strong national government. This excluded including the Bill of Rights, which were unnecessary and dangerous with the restrictions put on people’s freedoms and rights. The advantage of federalism was that it prevented the government from becoming too powerful since there was a dispersal of power from the national government to the state. This would help the people have a voice through their states and bring unity. If the system were to stay the same there would be mayhem and violence among the states. A nation would be unable to unite under these circumstances. Federalists believed in the power of a president instead of a monarch serving for life. A president would also be fairly elected by the people to serve the country for 4 years, giving the people a choice to replace or keep the current president. …show more content…

The president would also create trade with other countries to boost the economy of the nation and create jobs. The Articles of Confederation, which were supported by Anti-federalists, were proven ineffective since the federal government was too weak to enforce laws and taxes leaving them powerless. Without that enforcement, war debts went unpaid and inflation rose throughout the states. Every state had their own currency, own trade and own military leading to an unstable economy. Another downside was that the Articles of Confederation left states without proper representation as they were only allowed one vote, regardless of size/ population. All the problems built up and started Shay’s Rebellion, leaving the states in chaos and asking for changes to the Articles. The Confederation was able to fix these problems and make America great

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    433 Words  | 2 Pages

    They wanted a more centralized government. They had an open mind and wanted people's voice to be heard. In federalism the power is constitutionally divided between a central government and that of states or provinces. Each level of the government has its’ own obligation and power. It's different from Confederations because it gives the federal systems the central authority some amount of control over its citizens, thus endowing it with a level of sovereignty.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    719 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were developed to unite all of the 13 colonies as a nation, rather than having them all govern their selves based off of population. The Articles of Confederation had created a very loose alliance of the 13 colonies or states as they will later be referred to. The Articles of Confederation also had been created due to the fact that the Declaration of Independence never stated the word, “nation” and this led others to believe after independence had been officially stated that the colonies would attempt to govern themselves. Furthermore, the Articles of Confederation were completely necessary in its making because the Congress had to lay a base government down for the colonies or an “example” government. The first thing the Articles of Confederation provided would be the fact it gave the states the ability to retain their freedom,

    Read More

  • Why Did The Federalists Create A Strong Central Government

    404 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a representative democracy under which there would be a strong central government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government had little power other than to declare war, borrow and coin money, and regulate trade with Native Americans, along with a few others; it lacked the authority to regulate commerce among states, levy taxes, create a standing army, or prevent discrimination among states (Lowi) . The issues caused by the lack of authority of the central government quickly called for the need for change. This sculpted the Federalists’ objective to create a strong national government which had concrete governmental power strong enough to create unity among the states. One main focus for the Federalists

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis

    838 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the United States first gained their independence from Britain they needed to create a strong government for their colonies. The United States created their first government called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles came with many problems like no power to tax, no power to enforce the law, or regulate commerce. 10 years after having a weak government, they believed that a new type of government need to be created in order to become a strong government. They came up with the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    The constitution claims to have a goal to “form a more perfect union” and “insure domestic tranquility” (Document 1). These were both issues under the Articles of Confederation, considering the 13 states were extremely separate and divided, each with the ability to make it’s own taxes, currency, and trade regulations. Also, there

    Read More

  • Explain The Main Problems With The Articles Of Confederation

    394 Words  | 2 Pages

    1) The first problem with the Articles of Confederation was that Congress could not raise taxes and had no money of its own because the States collected taxes and were reluctant to fork over any money to the Congress. Article one section eight of the constitution tells Congress they have the power to collect taxes which fixed the problem of no body giving money to the Congress Article one section eight also solves another one of the main problems of the Articles of Confederation which was that a weak central government had a hard time standing up to foreign enemies. In the same section that solved our problem of money for the central government it also authorized Congress to raise an army. The third problem was the Articles of Confederation

    Read More

  • What Are The Causes Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    692 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the Articles of Confederation created the Northwest Ordinance; the failure to produce a stable Economy, the weakness of the Federal Government, and the inability to create a strong and structured army were causes of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles had forgot able many problems that could be faced

    Read More

  • The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

    99 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

    Read More

  • Anti Federalists Research Paper

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kimberly Paul Mr. Brandenburg 030817 Much like the Democrats and Republicans of today, Federalists and Anti-Federalists had diverging opinions on how the nation should be governed. Federalists had the utmost faith in the people and believed that they were the only ones capable of governing the nation fairly and efficiently. They were avid believers of a strong central government, a central bank, and an army. Federalist No. 39 states: “It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it,” proving that they were in favor of central, unionized government.

    Read More

  • Economic Effects Of The Articles Of Confederation

    126 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although the intention of the Articles of Confederation was to create a stable government for the 13 colonies, it was sadly designed poorly resulting in an overall ineffective government. The Articles may have been rewarded with some success with respect to western lands, but the overall effect was negative, especially the economic conditions. The economic conditions were primarily the most negative aspect of the Articles of Confederation. The inability to tax settlers caused the federal government to have a serious shortfall in revenue, and the restriction to regulate trade added to the chaos.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

    Read More

  • The Articles Of Confederation Endangered The Power Of States

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the Articles of Confederation protected the power of states, it severely limited the power of the federal government. For example, the Articles of Confederation prevented the federal government from regulating imports and exports. This allowed states to disproportionately levy taxes on each other. To rectify this issue, the Constitution granted the federal government the power to regulate interstate commerce. Also, the Articles of Confederation prevented the government from raising a standing army, which allowed for events of instability, such as Shay’s Rebellion to form.

    Read More

  • Discuss The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Problems

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

    Read More

More about Federalists: Becoming Too Powered By A Strong National Government

Open Document