Throughout the history of art human form, female nude is always a muse for artists. Sandro Botticelli depicted the goddess Venus in Birth of Venus and Titian created the standard for representations of the reclining female nude, Venus of Urbino in 1538. The both works have their own beauty, but there are always differences to allow each painting to stand on its own. There are special aspects on Rembrandt’s interpretation on Bathsheba Reading King David's Letter such as the nude’s gesture, emotions, composition and background will be discussed in this paper to analyze what did this painting reveal about the role of nude in the 17th century.
Rembrandt van Rijn was born on July 15,1606, in Leyden, Netherlands. Rembrandt went to school at
…show more content…
The scene depicts a moment from biblical narrative of King David, (II Samuel: Ch. XI: 1-27). Bathsheba is reading a letter from King David. In addition to bible text, Rembrandt captures the moment of Bathsheba is reading the letter from King David. He depicted Bathsheba as a young pretty woman with her eyes with sorrow. Nudity was the principle attribute in Rembrandt's Bathsheba Reading King David's Letter. Rembrandt’s painting can be read to exude a moral and erotic narrative, highlighting Bathsheba as both a sinner and a victim. There is variety of interpretations of this painting. Regarding the painting, the body, emotion, composition and background reveals the role of nude in the 17th century in this …show more content…
Bathsheba is painted in life-size in a 56x56 inch canvas. Rembrandt is known as the light and shade and as an artist who favored an uncompromising realism that would lead to the criticism that he preferred ugliness to beauty, which he greatly demonstrate his skills in this painting. The figure is placed on the shading background to set off the brightly lit body. The result is to now focus all attention on Bathsheba. No other painting founded her nude figure as such a dominating charisma. Rembrandt’s painting of 1654 depicts a life-size Bathsheba whose brightly lit nude body completely dominates the canvas. At her feet sits an old woman – her figure enveloped in a deep shadow and cropped on two sides by the frame – who is attending to Bathsheba’s right foot. In her right hand Bathsheba holds a letter, of which only blank back is visible. He applied the contrast of the old woman’s wrinkle with Bathsheba’s youthful female beauty. This eye-catching letter and the old woman, together with the young woman’s nudity and beauty, were the motifs that enabled the 17th century viewer to identify the main figure as Bathsheba. Furthermore, it was a unique approach on putting emphasis on the main figure by a very dark background and highlighted the figure. If in earlier paintings Rembrandt had made the bodies of his nudes stand out sharply against a very dark
4) is another outstanding example of Raphael’s Roman portraits. At the centre of this harmonious composition Raphael adds a curious psychological note in the melancholy eyes that illuminate the cardinal’s pallid and exhausted countenance. The portrait has been drawn in accordance with Leonardo’s opinion that portraits can be drawn best with a dark background. A reference to dark backgrounds may remind the reader of Raphael’s Florentine period under the influence of Leonardo when he produced “Granduca Madonna” (fig. 5), the masterpiece where he was able to draw exquisite rhythmical modulations out of the motionless simplicity of the design. Giorgio Vasari noted that Raphael excelled in creating effects of drapery folds disappearing into shadows and coming forward into light, and that he knew how to relate the colours of drapery to the flesh tones so that semi-nude figures did not seem cut into two.
The size of the artwork according the scale of a person is roughly 3/4 in width and the length of a full body. It is roughly similar to the
The two pieces of art I will discuss is Edouard Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and Mary Cassatt 's ‘Woman in Black at the Opera’. Manet’s Olympia was not critically accepted, the reaction to his painting was negative, only four critics out of sixty were favorably disposed to Olympia. Olympia was a derivative of Titian 's Venus. In 1863 the critics and the viewers didn’t know how to take Olympia, “they were unable to cope with so many novel factors and so they were unable to categorize the picture and so were unable to analyze it or understand it in any context” (Laurence, 2012). Nowadays we are more open minded and are able to see the painting in a different light.
Nudity in ancient Greek art is more abundant than that of a post-Christianity world, this is especially true for the depictions of the female form. While observing the chapter what struck me the most about the nudity in Greek sculptures was the lack of genitalia on the female form when compared to the male form. Granting there is the possibility that this perceived censorship could be attributed to the physiological facts of male genitalia being more external than that of females the re-occurrence throughout the period and presence of the pudica Venus. In addition to the seemingly censored female form the connotation of nudity between the genders seems to differ greatly and somewhat resemble the notions we modernly attribute to nudity today.
Bathsheba falls in line with the many “seductresses” of the Bible. A simple google search of her name pulls up a myriad of images of buxom women with curvy silhouettes and smoldering eyes. I find it fascinating that women are consistently portrayed as weak and inept in the Bible, yet they somehow have the power to bring the mightiest of men to their knees using their feminine wiles. Bathsheba, being one of these women, intrigued me immensely, and I researched several commentaries about her. Taking these perspectives into account, I learned a lot about some of the finer details of the story and some common misperceptions about the woman bathing on the roof.
The 1808 painting The Valpincon Bather by Ingres, is said to be “controversial”(oil painting techniques). At first glance, one may only see the back of a nude woman. If one looked closer there is a lot of different types of elements of composition. From the curtains, to the tassels it all plays a role.
The portrait was painted on wood panel and in gothic like form. Nonetheless, this masterpiece is representation of time, the complexity of the painting and the
The image of this milkmaid is an intricate symbol of her sexual availability1,2 (13) perceptible by several elements throughout the image. Milkmaid is an oil on canvas, Dutch painting done by Johannes Vermeer in 1657 and finished in 1658. It is a realism modeling painting of a woman, who is a milkmaid, standing around a still life image of a table of food in a kitchen pouring milk out of a pitcher into a bowl around the food. In this essay, I will explain my analysis and interpretation of this painting through describing elements and defining my own meaning from thoughts on research.
At a first glance, it is apparent that Titian’s Venus of Urbino and Cranach’s Nymph of the Spring share many similarities. One major similarity between these two pieces is the time period in which both were made in. Titian’s Venus of Urbino was made in 1538 while Cranach’s Nymph of the Spring was created around the year 1537. Both paintings depict women laying down comfortably in the nude as the main subjects of each piece. Both pieces could be considered portraits of these women.
Titian can paint reclining nudes with a virtuosity not found in many, or any, other painters of the Renaissance and beyond. Titian has been described as a master of paint and color to create seductive compositions. In his other dramatic scenes too of the Poesie, such as Perseus and Andromeda, he still provides a contrived and beautiful body spread in the best way to show of her figure. In Europa, he abandons this and he must do it for a reason. She is not sexually idealized; instead she is awkwardly flung about with her torso so scrunched up that any feminine curve that once resided here is now erased in folds of skin and fat.
The Canterbury tales is written by Geoffrey Chaucer takes place in the late 14 hundreds . Chaucer and 30 pilgrims are traveling to Canterbury, and to pass time each pilgrim tells a tale about their life. These tales are told through Chaucer's point of view, where he uses his humor to attract the reader in many different ways. Chaucer’s humor consist of three main attributes , sarcasm, sexism, and appearance. SEXISM - Chaucer uses Sexism to draw humor into The Canterburry Tales.
She was extremely important in ancient Greek mythology and for this reason was often used throughout ancient Greek artwork such as pottery, paintings, literature and sculptures. It was common to see differences in the way Aphrodite was portrayed in each individual art piece as the ancient Greeks believed she changed her appearance for every person so that she looked ideal and attractive to them. Much of this artwork displayed the goddess fully clothed until around 400 B.C when she began being illustrated naked. Aphrodite’s depiction in paintings was similar in some aspects and extremely different in others.
The painting has asymmetrical because the weight on each side is uneven. Mary is much bigger than baby Jesus. The dominate design in the painting would be Mary’s face. Mary’s face is key focus; it draws your attention to see what is next. But, Mary’s hands also take domination because in early painting Mary is barely holding on to Jesus, he is just floating above her lap, but in this painting you can tell the grip Mary has on Jesus.
Manet’s Olympia defied traditional art conventions in depicting the female body. The salon displayed traditional nudes for the pleasure of the, primarily male, viewer. Under the male gaze, the woman’s bare body became an erotic object—an object from which he may craft an erotic fantasy, characterized by male domination.
Sasha’s Description Paragraphs: Sleeping Venus (1510): In the painting entitled “Sleeping Venus”, by Giorgione, there is a nude woman reclining in the countryside with her right hand behind her head, and her left hand on her groin. She covers the whole width of the painting. She has amber-colored hair that is parted in the middle and braided around the sides. The woman is resting atop a red and gold gown, which her cream-colored skin contrasts with.