Enforcement of laws will save many lives. Most states have primary enforcement which means that an officer can pull you over and give you a citation even if there are no other violations. With this being the case many people argue that it can cause even more accidents. They argue that due to the prediction of drivers lowering their phones. That outcome may be possible, however the issue of texting and driving cannot be ignored.
Is it fair that in some states, a ban on texting while driving only applies to drivers under a certain age? 2. Should the use of all handheld devices, including just talking on the phone, be banned completely while driving? 3.
These restrictions are State laws and not Federal laws. Peter Roff uses all three forms of rhetorical persuasion (ethos, logos, and pathos) in his article to change the outcome of this proposed law. Peter Roff starts his article by discrediting U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. He brings up the fact that for years prior to the proposed law LaHood has said he would not ban cell phone usage while driving. Roff then describes distracted driving and how cell phone usage is not the only problem.
While distracted driving is a big issue in the United States, I firmly believe that the use of smartphones is one of, if not, the largest distractions Americans face today while driving. It seems that for some reason people can not wait until they are done driving, to wherever it is they are headed, to check their phone. Yes, I understand that in some situations people will have an emergency where they have to look at their phone, but in a vast majority of instances this is not the case. There are a few things that could be implemented that could persuade people to resist the urge to check their phones while driving such as banning the use of cellular devices in vehicles all together, fixing vehicles so that they cannot emit WiFi anymore, also implementing a device in vehicles that could make the inside of a vehicle a dead zone. First of all banning the use of cell phones in vehicles could be a very tricky stunt to pull off.
By doing so it provides a dangerous experience for all drivers on the road. Some drivers who are on the road right now are still being taught how to drive. To be taught to drive in a state that does not have this law, provides an awful and hazardous experience that i would hate to have. Making the use of hand-held devices illegal in some states has made the drivers of those states become more engaged to their driving. Those who use hand-held devices while driving are more engaged to their cellphone then they are to the road.
Despite the strict sanctions placed to curb it, drunk driving continues to be an unwavering predicament in most states. The number of offenders taken to custody by the police is rising by the day; with matters being made worse by the escalating number of underage drinkers. Many solutions have been put forth in an effort to reduce drunk driving and consequently reduce the number of road carnages. The persistence of the problem however calls for improved solutions. This paper forms a discussion on drunk driving and current prevention strategies; and proposes solutions to the unrelenting problem.
Also with the ongoing safe driving propaganda the Government and Queensland transport department inputted, road fatalities are still continuing. So therefore how can the safe driving campaign have been effective in ensuring the safety of motorists? The safe driving campaign was effective in that it followed the usual norms of propaganda. Also the campaign was effective in influencing motorists to drive in a more-safe manner, thou it takes time to be accepted and understood by the general
but so are older adults. States ae creating laws against handheld devices to help prevent accidents. Several states include California, Connecticut and Oregon have already passed laws to ban all texting
In the United States, significant urban communities are thinking about managing Uber. In any case, it confronts considerably more difficulties as it extends globally as a few nations are picking to boycott Uber or certain administrations that it offers. Uber should adjust its showcasing procedure to address both challenges inside the United States and in addition to the different laws upheld in various nations. Yet, as with each quickly developing organization, Uber additionally has shortcomings that can keep it from growing further.
There will be a huge different on the streets. This section involves (public transportation, road winding, and financial penalty to the traffic law breakers). These are the main mentioned sections in this
For many people, their cell phones are never far from them, even while they are driving. Unfortunately, some drivers use their phones to text a friend or otherwise engage in distracted driving behavior while driving. This distracted driving behavior sometimes causes accidents, either with other drivers or even with pedestrians, which can result in serious injury or death. Currently, New York state lawmakers are looking at a law that would allow police to scan the cell phones of people who were involved in car crashes to see if cell phone distractions contributed to the crash.
Glaring at your phone for a split second or flipping through your music playlist may seem harmless in contrast to drinking and driving. Drunken driving is treated as a serious criminal offence, and carries a strong social stigma. Until we reach the point where using digital devices while driving is just as unacceptable as drunken driving, new laws will not be tough enough, or taken seriously. The issue that many drivers face is distracted driving laws are not always heavily enforced as policer officers have a hard time trying prove that the accused was on their digital device.
Distracted driving. What do people think when they hear that? Most would say texting, but is it true? Distracted driving is anything that takes people's eyes or mind off of there driving task (“Arm Yourself with the facts.”) and (Benton). Yes, the drivers mind too, meaning anyone's music, other humans or pet, conversations, thinking, stress, etc.