Figurative Language In Julius Caesar
Victorian playwright, William Shakespeare, in his tragedy, Julius Caesar, writes a funeral speech delivered by Marc Antony about his dear friend, Julius Caesar 's, death. This followed Marcus Brutus’ speech which defended the actions of the conspirators that killed Caesar by claiming it was done for the good of Rome. Antony refutes these claims through his use of parallelism, making the plebeians analyze Brutus’ allegations, intense imagery to evoke a sense of pity and vengeance their fallen ruler, and reverse psychology that finally infames the plebeians against the conspirators. These strategies are used to indict the conspirators for the murder of a beloved Roman officer and incite the plebeians to riot against Brutus and his men.. Antony’s …show more content…
He compares himself to Brutus, claiming that he cannot “stir men’s blood” through his speaking as Brutus can (Shakespeare 224). First of all, this established a line of trust with his audience - Antony is able to convince the plebeians that he is not aiming to manipulate their actions, only to speak his truth of Caesar’s death. Feeling betrayed by Brutus at this point, this argument is effective in giving the plebeians a new faith in Antony’s words. However, in actuality, this statement is enough to compel the plebeians to the exact opposite. The common folk are made to “move / the stones of Rome to rise and mutiny” because of Antony’s enunciation (Shakespeare 230-231). At first glance, Antony mentions this only to provide a dissimilarity between himself and Brutus, claiming Brutus would have advocated for these acts. But Antony has a deeper meaning to this phrase, one that the plebeians latch onto and use as their rallying cry. By making this the last words he delivers on this topic, this phrase subliminally pushes his audience to revolt. This is because these plebeians are like children, they do the exact opposite of what they are told, only remember information for small periods of time, and are easily swayed. Antony uses these qualities to his advantage by using reverse psychology to persuade the plebeians to insurrection and purposely ending on a battle cry for this
Julius Caesar: Analysis Of Tone In Funeral Speeches
882 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar: Analysis of Tone in Funeral Speeches MLK, Jr. once said, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends” (Goodreads). In the play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, actions and words are used and spoken against a friend and a rival contributing to the assassination of their fellow friend Caesar. Two people that were very close to Caesar speak out against each other during their funeral speeches. Brutus, who is a “friend” and also a conspirator against Caesar, and Antony who is a very loyal friend to Caesar, use several rhetorical and literary devices as they create tone of proud assertive and defiant manipulation to get the Roman citizens on their side.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech
207 Words | 1 PagesMark Antony is trying to win over the people of Rome by his very effective use of rhetoric. In his speech, his overall point is to persuade the Roman citizens that Brutus’s claim of Caesar being ambitious is not true. Antony’s use of rhetorical devices such as a rhetorical question give the people a good message. When he is telling them that Caesar brought many captives to Rome, he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious” (3.2.18). Antony’s rhetorical question was very effective since he is making the people question Brutus’s claim.
Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
978 Words | 4 PagesThe Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.
Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesAntony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesBy refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.
Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
671 Words | 3 PagesIn Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,
Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
558 Words | 3 PagesThese devices strike sympathy in the plebeians for Caesar, but also a strong displeasure towards Brutus. By talking about his friend’s death in a tragic way, Antony not only persuades the plebeians to side with him instead of Brutus, but he also causes the plebeians to come together in a massive horde and become a violent riot through
Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesAfter reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar's Death Speeches
620 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Julius Caesar Funeral Death Speeches Julius Caesar was like a god to his people because he was the leader in Rome, and he influenced numerous individuals. People were shocked when Caesar was murdered by Bursitis because they lost their hero. During Caesar’s funeral, as described in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar , there are two speeches given by Brutus and Anthony. Some of the rhetorical terms that are used in the death speeches are antithesis, metaphor, chiasmus, and alliteration which will be explained in the body of this essay.
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech
617 Words | 3 PagesMarc Antony gives his speech at Caesar’s funeral to the citizens of Rome. The purpose of his speech is to prove to the citizens that Brutus is wrong and Caesar shouldn’t have been killed. The tone of his speech is very ironic. It also gets very dramatic as he talks about Caesar being killed.
The Rhetorical Questions In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
789 Words | 4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word “ambitious,” and a direct reference in Antony 's speech to persuade the plebeians to rebel against the conspirators. Antony appeals to the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to revolt. Antony discusses the economic dominance and vigor that Caesar brought to Rome, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).
Rhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech
373 Words | 2 PagesAntony is trying to find out whether they believe if Brutus had a valid reason to assassinate Caeser. He achieves his goal of making the murder seem unethical by using his convincing argument. Overall, Mark Antony’s speech was helpful in trying to convince the Plebeians. By the end of his speech, the Plebeians believed that the murder of Julius Caesar by the conspirators was an unrightful doing. The conspirators might’ve gotten away with the murder, but will never be seen the same by the
Essay On Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
704 Words | 3 PagesWilliam Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word ambitious, and direct reference in Antony 's speech to instigate the plebeians and persuade them to rebel against the conspirators. Antony pulls on the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to rebel. Antony discusses the money that Caesar left to the countrymen, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).
Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesMarcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with
The Theme Of Betrayal In Julius Caesar
1177 Words | 5 PagesThere are two reasons why Antony gave this speech. The first was to get back at Brutus for murdering his beloved friend, and making him pay for it. The main reason Antony gave this speech is because he had a greed for power. He thought that if he could get all the plebeians on his side, that they would attack the conspirators and trust Antony, therefore making it easy to take on the spot for power. “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards, For Antony is but a limb of Caesar.
More about Figurative Language In Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar: Analysis Of Tone In Funeral Speeches
882 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech
207 Words | 1 PagesRhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
978 Words | 4 PagesAntony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesUse Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
671 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
558 Words | 3 PagesEthos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar's Death Speeches
620 Words | 3 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech
617 Words | 3 PagesThe Rhetorical Questions In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
789 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech
373 Words | 2 PagesEssay On Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
704 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesThe Theme Of Betrayal In Julius Caesar
1177 Words | 5 Pages