It would be extremely difficult to add a constitutional amendment and remove the electoral college, and the current electoral college disproportionately represents some, thus some sort of reform is necessary to maintain the peace. According to the USA Today’s editorial board, “one idea worth considering is to shift away from winner-take-all in each state to a proportional allocation of electors based on statewide vote totals.” This election method would make all states like Nebraska and Maine, where electoral votes may be divided amongst parties. In using this system, the popular vote would be more important, but would not be the ultimate deciding factor of the election, essentially combining the arguments for the two opposing sides. The number of electoral votes for each state should not change, as that would mean the population of congress would have to change. Since a state’s number of electoral votes is representative of its house members and senate members, the way electoral votes are awarded should be changed.
Here enters the idea of amendments. These flaws threatened but also aided the readiness for democracy in the United States. The constitution still allowed slavery, it founded what we now know as the electoral college, protects the president from popular majority, gave state legislatures more power, gave congress more power than any other democratic colony, and didn’t limit the judicial branch. Now when they created this constitution, they didn’t realize at the time that some problems would come with it, but in realty, these flaws help make the constitution stronger. As problems arise within certain aspects of the constitution, the farmers made it so that amendments could be made in order to fix whatever needed fixing.
He expected for congress to help him with this. This made things less effective and slowed down the government. Legislation could not get passed, due to the fact hardly any compromises could be made. When it comes to foreign affairs, he promised one thing and gave another. His actions caused Iran caused the US embassy to be over ran and Americans were taken hostage for 444 days.
Of course President Andrew Jackson saw this as a huge issue. Jackson saw that if South Carolina were to leave the Union that this could cause other states to leave whenever they felt like it also. In Jefferson’s article, he writes about how the president and vice president are chosen by the people. And even though a state might vote for one candidate, the majority of the other states might vote for the opposer and they may become president. Yet, this still does not give the state (that did not vote for that president) the right to revolt and disrupt the Union.
To me, if FDR could overcome these obstacles which he did, he could move the country forward in the right direction. By not being so easily convinced or influenced by Upton Sinclair campaign or anyone else for that matter, Roosevelt became the great leader / liberal that our country was so desperately looking for to restoring
Is this the right way to vote for the president of the United States. Overall, should the Electoral College stay in place or should it be replaced? The Electoral College has many cons that must be heard before a decision can be made. A huge downside to the Electoral College is that it misperceives the general population into thinking that they
If one of the Democrats Clinton or Sanders is elected they have vowed to nominate a Justice(s) that will overrule Citizens United v. FEC (2013). This will not only bring polarization in the future, but is already doing so, since the more something is discussed the more opinionated citizens become; believing we should either follow exactly what was interpreted from the Constitution or those who allow their experiences with corporations to influence their point of view. If a Republican is elected the ideological majority will remain the same in the court, but even with that being true, the election will inevitably affect future decisions. For example, if Trump becomes president he will likely nominate a Justice(s) who favor corporations in upcoming court cases. There will also likely be many more same-sex marriage and abortion cases in the future and whoever becomes President will appoint a Justice(s) who agrees with them on these major issues, so it is likely that will affect future decisions on those types of cases as well leading to some cases being overturned.
Ever since President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial there has been controversy concerning the final vote that sealed the decision. Johnson had taken the office as president after Abraham Lincoln’s assassination in 1865. However Johnson, who was a Democrat, immediately clashed with the Grand Old Party because it had been dominated by Radical Republicans, specifically Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner. Many bills were passed by the Republican Congress, but Johnson would veto them. Because the republicans had a majority they would override his every veto with a two-thirds vote.
It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number. With everything done electronically today, a straightforward mainstream vote would suffice. I don 't trust the Electoral College was ever implied as an approach to maintain a strategic distance from the mainstream vote comes about. It is just an obsolete framework that ought to be discarded.
Many people will say the electoral college hasn’t caused that many problems. When you look at the big picture, both Republicans and Democrats have been hurt by the outcomes of some elections, mainly Bush vs. Gore and Obama vs. Romney. Republicans and Democrats are on board to abolish the electoral college. Just because the electoral college is in the constitution doesn’t mean that it is a good thing. If you look at the constitution you see all of the things that amendments have changed.
In drafting the constitution the establishing father were obviously worried to redress the insufficiencies o f thee articles of confederation under which the insubordinate provinces had been administered amid the insurgency. The articles had presented official and in addition administrative power on congress setting up in actuality parliamentary government without a prime’s pastor. The individuals who differ were consoled by the desire that Washington would be the main head of state. In the meantime their test under the British crown drove the establishing father to support less centralization of power than they saw in the British government. The constitution additionally brought congers into the bargain making process with holding from the president the selective power appreciated by European rulers to make arrangements.
Only a few politicians are fighting for the democratic seat in the presidential election and Bernie Sanders in making his way up to number one. His beliefs on everything from healthcare to gun control help establish him as a frontrunner. He looks to improve America by addressing the country 's main trouble spots. Therefore, if Sanders was elected as president he would positively influence the United States. Bernie Sanders wants to better America as a whole while promoting equality and balance.
It was written after Marry, wife of William, and daughter of James the second, who tried to steal the English crown(DEW). The English Bill of Rights was made to prevent one person from gaining too much power. King James the second had abused his power and so these rights were written to prevent our own President or other leaders from gaining too much power as well. The English Bill of Rights was made up of many different documents whereas the United States Bill of Rights were about the citizens and their interactions with the government(DEW). John Locke had a great influence on the United States Government because of his many different interests dealing with American Government.
Instead, we use an indirect method to elect our president through the Electoral College. The 2016 presidential election well demonstrated the possibility that the electoral college could generate a different outcome with the one of popular votes. It also brought back the controversy about whether or not we should continue to use this method to elect our president. The Electoral College system, as an indirect election measure, has various drawbacks and should be abolished and changed to a more widely-accepted method to encourage people to cast their votes that truly represent their interests, given the fact that we have reached a point that the technology is mature enough to help us to do
In the U.S Constitution, it states that if President is convicted of any treason, corruption, or any other high Crimes and transgressions they can be removed from office. However, there are many steps to being impeach. The first thing in order for the President to be impeach is when the situation of the President brings attention to the members of the House of Representatives. Next, they are handed over to the House Judiciary Committee to see if the situation is serious. If the situation is serious then the president would be presented to the U.S Senate to decide if he should be impeached.