Demetrios Zioulis
TVF 1507 – Prof. Baeva
03/19/2018
Film Analysis: Leviathan Andrey Zvyagintsev’s 2014 Leviathan (Leviafan) is a captivating tragic drama full of deception and coercion taking place in contemporary Russia. The film is shown through a widescreen, panorama style lens. The film seems to draw much influence from Russian cinema most notably, Andrei Tarkovsky’s 1986 film, The Sacrifice, and the country’s own history. The film features breathtaking landscapes and a barren environment that reflects the isolation of the characters themselves. The story is about Koyla, a man who is fighting a losing battle against the broken criminal justice system run by the town’s corrupt mayor, the leviathan, who is out to take his land and property
…show more content…
Upon viewing Andrei Tarkovsky’s The Sacrifice, I was able to draw comparisons between the beginning and endings of both films. The openings of the films though different, are similar in that they both reveal nature and landscapes. The purpose here seems to be to provide a sense of isolation. They also seem to both be shot in the same wide-panorama style lens. Although the plots themselves are different. The ending sequences meanings, in both films, are very similar. Alexander the protagonist of The Sacrifice appears to lose everything dear to him, his possessions, home (which go up in flames) and his mind because he is taken away by paramedics. This theme of loss and devastation is apparent in Koyla’s character in the Leviathan as well. In terms of providing a real sense of what it’s like to live in contemporary Russia, this is what I believe was the primary goal of the director. In an interview conducted by Shaun Walker, Moscow’s - the Guardian correspondent, Zvyagintsev said “It’s like being in a minefield, this is the feeling you live with here. It’s very hard to build any kind of prospects – in life, in your profession, in your career – if you are not plugged in to the values of the system.” The director’s negative view of Russia was portrayed clearly in his film and it’s the reason why the film received such negative criticism from Russian-born critics/journalists. Vladimir Posner, a veteran Russian journalist, said “Anything seen as being critical of Russia in any way is automatically seen as either another Western attempt to denigrate Russia and the Orthodox Church, or it's the work of some kind of fifth column of Russia-phobes who are paid by the West to do their anti-Russian work or are simply themselves profoundly anti-Russian” (Macfarquhar 2015). This is only a single example of the scorn the movie received from its homeland. Despite all the negative feedback the
On “October 14, 2003”(Steve Bartman Incident-Wikipedia), Steve Bartman made a mistake that would change his life for good. Alex Gibney made a documentary called “Catching Hell” to explain how one man deserves an apologize from “40,000” (“Catching Hell”) Cub fans for an act that was only human. Many people think Steve Bartman needs to apologize for what he did to the Cubs and their fans, but Alex Gibney has disagreed with the fans.
In Maus, Art Spiegelman records his personal accounts of trying to delve into his father’s traumatic past. His father, Vladek, is a Jew from Poland who survived persecution during World War II. Art wants to create a graphic novel about what his father went through during the Holocaust, so he reconnects with Vladek in order to do so. Due to the horrifying things that the Jews went through he has trouble opening up completely about all the things that happened to him. But after Art gets together with his father many times, he is finally able to understand the past legacy of the Spiegelman family.
In conclusion one can tell that these two works of literature are very similar in one hand, and on the other they are very different. Also by reading the two Pieces of literature one can tell that there are lines that are uncannily similar and look to be copied almost word for word. Overall it just goes to show that their are many interpretations on how mankind and universe were
It’s easy to pin point the difference but in reality they share common themes which includes life lessons. Despite the difference in the years and the actors both the classic and sequel has common themes that can be applied to situations now in day. When we compare and contrast
Both of these are very powerful tools created by people to really portray the horrible events that occurred and really happened to people in the Holocaust. There are many similarities and difference between the two movies but neither is more or less powerful in getting the point of complete disgust across to the viewer. There
They also had their differences, but after reading and watching both, you can tell that they had to have used some ideas from the poem in the movie. In conclusion, they have greater similarities than there are
The nature of Russian society is characterized by a sense of idealism. Russia’s beliefs of the potential for an ideal future have been pervasive throughout history. In 1920, Yevgeny Zamyatin wrote the short story “The Cave” during the midst of the Russian Civil War, a time when nationalism was at an all time low and people were hoping for a brighter future. In contrast to the goals that sparked the revolution, Zamyatin argues that the Russian Civil War will result in a primitive and decimated society that is ultimately worse off than the society that existed prior to the rebellion.
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
It portrays the 1917 Russian Revolution atmosphere with the replacement of Russia into Animal Farm. The characters also did not fail to resemble the real people involved in the revolution. Power leads to greed, used to take advantage and manipulate. A person with absolute power tends to choose greediness after a certain time period, despite having followed a wise person’s vision and
The only other film that anyone can recall that alludes to Bobby Fischer’s life is Searching For Bobby Fischer. Pawn Sacrifice is a darker, more mature, more painful take on his life, specifically, versus on another chess player enamored by and torn by Bobby Fischer. What immediately stood out to me are the compelling aesthetics and cinematography, actually. I did not check prior to seeing the film, but after, I realised that the cinematographer for Pawn Sacrifice is one of my faves, Bradford Young. His genius can be seen in Pariah, Middle of Nowhere, Selma and A Most Violent Year, for example.
City of Thieves – David Benioff How has David Benioff explored the dehumanising aspects of war in his novel? City of Thieves is historical fiction set in the besieged Russian city of Leningrad during World War Two. Lev Beniov, a Jewish seventeen year old, details his story as the protagonist through his first person narrative perspective of the siege. Benioff’s focus is the desensitized attitudes and behaviour shared by characters throughout the novel as they contend with dehumanising situations which would appear horrifying under circumstances that have been unaffected by war. Through the utilisation of techniques such as characterisation, plot and first person narrative, Benioff explores the dehumanising aspects of war in his novel.
It portrays the 1917 Russian Revolution atmosphere with the replacement of Russia into Animal Farm. The characters also did not fail to resemble the real people involved in the revolution. Power leads to greed, used to take advantage and manipulate. A person with absolute power tends to choose greediness after a certain time period, despite having followed a wise person’s vision and mission.
They both relate to each other in a couple of ways how the main characters in both stories hallucinate and have an ambition for something.
Saint Petersburg, the setting of Crime and Punishment, plays a major role in the formation in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s acclaimed novel. Dostoyevsky’s novels focus on the theme of man as a subject of his environment. Dostoyevsky paints 1860s St. Petersburg as an overcrowded, filthy, and chaotic city. It is because of Saint Petersburg that Raskolnikov is able to foster in his immoral thoughts and satisfy his evil inclinations. It is only when Raskolnikov is removed from the disorderly city and taken to the remoteness of Siberia that he can once again be at peace.
It seems that due to difference in maturity between the two films affected the objectives of the directors in a way that evolved the