Chapter 3 – Iceland (Case Study) Iceland became one of the symbols of the global financial crisis. Before the global financial crisis, Iceland was one of the most stable countries with high standard of living, low unemployment and very low rate of government debt. Iceland became a good example of success stories of globalization and financial deregulation. Iceland was a country that was listed as a “developing country” up until 1973 by the United Nations became one of the wealthiest countries in Europe in a scope of a decade. [Preludes to the Icelandic Financial Crisis by Robert Z. Aliber, Gylfi Zoega] This all changed on September 29th 2008, when Glitnir, the country’s third largest bank was taken over by the government. In an effort to revive …show more content…
They issued debt securities in the capital markets with short maturities to obtain the funds necessary to make loans to their customers. Since the loans to their customers had longer-term maturities than their debt securities, Icelandic banks were extremely vulnerable if their credit ratings were lowered or turbulence in the capital markets prevented them from issuing debt securities. Iceland’s small size and sparse population made it difficult for the banks to collect domestic retail deposits. Thus, to feed their insatiable appetite for capital, the banks started to look elsewhere for deposits and ultimately opening online savings branches across northern Europe most notably in the UK and the Netherlands. In a 5 year period the banks’ were able to accumulate liabilities of 10 times the GDP or $120 billion and by the second quarter of 2008, Iceland’s external debt was 9.553 trillion Icelandic Kronur (€ 50 billion), more than 80% of which was held by the banking sector. This value compares with Iceland’s 2007 gross domestic product of 1.293 trillion kronur (€ 8.5 billion). (World Bank) [Iceland Country Study Guide Volume 1 Strategic Information and Developments by IBP, …show more content…
All three banks had the same business model and to some extent depended on the same macro-economy and were perceived by the international capital markets as being highly related and tightly interconnected (much like Wall Street in the US). This means that a difficulty in one bank can affect confidence in the other banks, which could lead to bank runs. The three main banks were responsible for 85% of Iceland’s financial system and with no doubt their failure would have a catastrophic effect on the economy. As the interbank lending markets dried up in 2008, following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Icelandic banks found themselves unable to borrow to cover their short-term financing and it was a matter of days before their collapse which they did eventually. Iceland’s Lack of
These “bank runs” caused even more banks to close down, and by the end of the decade, around 9,000 banks had to close down. The surviving ones became skeptical of loans and were not willing
Many countries are in the process of industrializing, such as China, and other countries are in their post industrial era like the United States. When the economy failed in 2008, the entire world was affected. While many of these countries faced hard times after the economic failure, the elites of most still flourished (Priestland, p 232, 233). Any country that was tied to the global market in some way was affected. They were affected because the merchants had created a world economy in which all major world nation participated.
Beginning with bank reform, the New Dealers were able to maintain oversight in the banking industry, which had previously been an unregulated and unpredictable source of capital. The Glass-Steagal Act and the Emergency Banking Act signaled a shift from a lassiez faire approach to the banking industry to one that ensured banks were making responsible loans and not gambling with depositor’s savings in the stock market. By not allowing banks who were considered “irresponsible’ to reopen and separating the savings and investment functions of the banks, a more secure system began to emerge. The impact of this legislation was immediate, as bank failures dropped dramatically. Additionally, major breakdowns in the banking industry were avoided until fairly recently, which came as a result of the repeal of Glass-Steagal.
Basically, debt can be regarded as an amount of money ‘borrowed’ by one party to another. Debts that will be paid by customers is good debts. This means the money, which has already been converted into products and services can be paid successfully by customers in a certain time period. Good debt can help companies generate income and fund their normal operations. If the accountant can be reasonably sure that the total shown in the statement of financial position represents good debts, the liquidity of capital and cash are guaranteed and facilitated.
In 1930 alone over 3000 banks collapsed and by the end of 1930 over 9000 banks failed. This was because so many stocks and investments had been traded and lost during 1929. Many people also went into a panic about their money so they started taking what was left of their money out of their banks since they did not want to lose that money. This was commonly known as a run on the bank. After the banks started shutting down many businesses went bankrupt, which led to thousands of unemployed people.
This shows that overnight panics can be the initial catalyst for longer economic downturns. The panic of 1907 shows further links between financial distress and failure among financial intermediaries specifically trust companies, and the poor performance of the nonfinancial firms that depended on them for loans and other financial services. This shows that there needed to be some form of a central bank to help mitigate these panics. More importantly the panic of 1907 had many severe effects, “industrial output fell 17% in 1908, and real GNP fell by 12%”
Elizabeth Warren faced elite democracy when she was trying to form an agency to monitor financial products, and she succeeded in creating a grass-roots movement to truly protect the American people form the banking industry. The banking industry hurt the U.S. economy by hiding small print in financial contracts that cost many individuals and families by tricking them into large payments that they had not accounted for. Banks quickly learned that they could profit from tricking and trapping the American people, and began to make a majority of their financial gains from these policies . The best part about these policies was that they were completely legal.
Also known as the FDIC. The FDIC gave the government the ability to insure money deposited in the banks. There was a limit on this insurance but it protects people from losing all of their money. This ended the bank crisis.
The overall belief was that it was very possible to enhance the solution of the public debt in various ways. The creation of the Bank of
This led to bank closures, job loss, and declining
When was the start of the recent financial crises? Fitzpatrick IV and Thompson (2011) asserted that “many observers point to the summer of 2007 as the starting date for the financial crisis that would bring down most of the U.S. investment banking industry” (p. 1). However, there are many conditions that led up to the crisis, including housing policies and interest rates. Besides banks, government, homebuyers, and rating agencies had a role in the financial crisis, which led to the federal government actions to pass the Dodd-Frank Act to solve and avoid another crisis in the future.
When banks failed, people that had money in their account, in the bank would lose their money even if they did not owe any debt to the bank. This caused families to go homeless and even
In Addition to maldistribution stood the credit structure of the economy, some farmers were in deep land mortgage debt, so they lowered their crop prices in order to regain credit, and because the farmers were no longer accountable for what they owed banks. Across the nation the banking system found themselves in constant trouble. In America both small and large bankers were concerned for their survival, so they began investing recklessly in stock markets and granting unwise loans. These unconscious decisions would lead a large consequence, such as families losing their life savings and their deposits became uninsured. “ More than 9,000 American banks either went bankrupt or closed their doors to avoid bankruptcy between 1930 and 1933.”Although
The companies that went out of business lowered our economy. This caused people to take out loans and that is when run on banks started up. The run on banks invested money in the stock market and lost money just like everyone else. They also loaned money to stock speculators who lost their money on black Tuesday, just like everybody else. Then people started losing faith that the banks could pay them back so everyone started taking large amounts of money out all at once.