Financial Differences Between Massachusetts And Virginia

453 Words2 Pages
Both the financial matters and governmental issues were very different between Massachusetts and Virginia in the vicinity of 1607 and 1750. The distinctions in the level of classes were extremely large and their whole economic structure contrasted from each other. Virginia had more hazardous culture and economics where-as Massachusetts had a more steady economy. The wealth of Virginia was construct only with respect to the creation of tobacco. The ranch proprietors needed to purchase slaves to till the ground so the slave exchange industry in Virginia was additionally an immense factor. The plantation owners were in the exceptionally rich, world class classification and essentially ran the legislative issues. Virginia had a ludicrously little working class and they barely had any say in the races. The poor classes of Virginia were around 80% of the populace and were not permitted to vote. This made the state/state of Virginia…show more content…
There was a bigger white collar class of 65% and there was much more portrayal in governmental issues in Massachusetts. The economy was much more immovable in light of the fact that it didn't just depend on one type of wage. Since there were numerous harbors in Massachusetts there were more towns which drove to the need of new callings. There included Blacksmiths, Dressmakers, Merchants, and mariners. There was likewise considerably more income in Massachusetts on the grounds that there was no compelling reason to parade riches and a much larger white collar class. Another purpose behind the more prominent measures of money flow was that the general population that lived in Massachusetts were for the most part Puritan. The Puritans trusted that you ought not to demonstrate your riches since it was temptation and enticement was a transgression. The Puritans were to a great degree dedicated and that is one of the primary reasons the Northern provinces were so
Open Document