Five Arguments Against Gun Control

On the pro side, people who are attacked can defend themselves, and people might assume those around them have guns and may be less likely to act violently. The cons of concealed carry are that it can lead to injuries by mistakes, and that it can lead to tragic endings to heated arguements. Although the cons sound bad, they are due to human error and anger and cannot be eradicated. The concerns that the Anti-CC side have are concerns that are not exclusive to concealed carry- they also apply to regular gun ownership. Someone who legally owns a gun and keeps it in his or her home can shoot his or her spouse in the midst of a heated arguement.

According to ProCon.org “universal background checks could reduce firearm deaths by a projected 56.9%”. As seen in the quote, deaths would decrease substantially since people who are using the gun to hurt would never get them in the first place. Gun control laws would definitely add in background checks in order to get a legal gun. Many gun users also agree with this check on whether or not people should get their background checked before a gun in purchased. People may argue that people can get guns illegally.

David DeGrazia proposes a moderate control of guns meaning that only individuals with a need for self-protection be allowed to own a gun and only after a complete course in safety (Hsiao and Berstein). DeGrazia also believes that owning a gun increases the likelihood that a person will be killed in their own home whether accidentally or intentionally (Hsiao and Berstein). The Democratic Party believes that stricter background checks will deter guns from being purchased by the wrong people. That might be true, but will it stop a violent person from committing a

The government should encourage people to own guns. Many violent incidents happened in the situation which victims do not have firearms to defend. Therefore, gun control would not reduce crime. Guns are tools, they cannot kill people, civilians are able to use guns for self-defense. Guns control laws are meaningless, prohibit guns cannot make people feel safer.

Guns just happen to be one of the biggest problems that is affected by people's attitudes. For, the thing is that when people's attitudes drive them to do such things as mass shootings and other things such as suicides and homicides. These sort of things point the attention from the messed up people with the messed up attitudes to guns. In another sense, you have heard the saying “guns don't kill people, people kill people”. Honestly, this is one of the most accurate statements for guns don’t point themselves and they do not pull their own trigger.

There just might be an opportunity to solve the problem of mass murders caused by disturbed individuals with guns. If we can get the politicians to stop talking long enough to listen. They may realize they are both wrong on the issue of gun control. Note how carefully I chose my words there. Guns do not kill people.

While guns are banned, people will look for anyway they can to use guns, which leads to stealing and more possible deaths or injuries. Guns are important not only for self-defense or sport but to keep our country under control. Everyone wants to be able to defend themselves and the things they love when it comes down to it. If a random stranger breaks into a house in the middle of the night threating the

In this world, there are too many people that have died from guns. Some of them have died in large-scale attacks, some of them were in a gun accident. Many want more gun control laws to be passed. In fact, the gun control law must be passed through, because this can be more effective to protect people. people always thinking if they have a gun, they can protect themselves.

We need to think of others and how they would feel if they lost a loved one of if someone lost you. Firearms had good a bad sides that is hard to tell who is on which side. Gun control debate still going on in congress, because the use of guns can be good in a good way and can save our life and harm it. The unsuccessful gun control policy affect many violence in each year, although there are many programs that help us to use guns in the correct way, people still use it as a4 We should only use it when our life is in danger or is considered as a threat. Some don’t think of it this way they think it’s cool to have a gun, just to see that it’s cool.

According to “Gun Control,” these “High-Risk” folk are purchasing firearms because of the flawed system (“Gun Control”). People opposed to gun control argue that taking guns from the citizens does not prevent criminals from getting their hands on guns, as they will just get them illegally anyways. People who oppose gun licensing, mandatory waiting periods and background checks argue that the “normal” gun owners must and do these things, not the criminals. They also argue that criminals are less likely to commit crimes if they think their victims may be armed. Notably, another viable source of information is Bitto, Dana, and Elisa Juliano’s report on the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting in 2012.