ipl-logo

Five Presumptions Of The Behaviour Of Parties Involved In A Contract

1095 Words5 Pages

There are five essential features that must exist in order to enforce a contract. The features are; agreement, consideration, intention to create legal relations, capacity and absence of vitiating factors. Agreement is when one party offers and another party accept. Agreement is achieved when both parties assent with one another. The second fundamental feature is consideration, this is when the parties exchanges promises to give or to do something for one another. Other than that, parties involved in the contract must be intended to have legal consequences regarding the agreement. Parties involved also need to be legal in terms of age. Ultimately, there should not be any vitiating factors exist which may cause the contract to be void. …show more content…

In this case of Chris and others v LongNet, vitiating factors are present and there is no agreement between both parties. The plaintiffs and defendant did not have the same knowledge and understanding about each other’s preferences. Furthermore, LongNet’s advertisements are simply an invitation to treat. Chris and his friends merely made an offer and LongNet did not accept the offer, hence, agreement are not

Show More
Related

  • Limon V. Case Study

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plaintiff alleges that it notified Defendants of its representation of the Clients. Thereafter, Defendants entered into a settlement agreement in regard to the Hospital Bill (the “Settlement Agreement”). Per the Settlement Agreement, Geico agreed to pay St. David’s 50% of the Hospital

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Nafta Traders V Quinn

    299 Words  | 2 Pages

    The employer alleged that the arbitrator went beyond his authority in shielding the award. The trial court settled the award, and the Court of Appeals held that the employer could not justify its complaints citing the Hall Street opinion. 3. Issue for the court to decide: Does policies include an arbitration clause? In arbitration is that going to continue be

    Read More

  • Billy Buyer Case Summary

    506 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligation to negotiate her claim with the Defendant prior to filing the lawsuit. The Defendant affidavit is attached herein. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing fact, and as the Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligations, Defendant requests the Court to dismiss this case complying with forgoing New York federal court decision. Date: New York, New York June 18,

    Read More

  • Jewelry Wholesale V. Jennifer Lawson For Breach Of Contract

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Greene’s Case, they had Ms. Lawson sign a confidentiality agreement that was disregarded by the defendant. Although the accused became distraught with the loss of her position, it was wrong to relay the information regarding ever-gold to a competitor. c) Facts to be

    Read More

  • Essay On Zapatha Vs Dairy Mart

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    The trial court held for Zapatha. Dairy mart appealed. In Zapatha v Dairy Mart, 381 Mass. 284; N.E. 2d. 1370 there are two issues at hand. 1) Does the unconscionability of an agreement depend on whether at the time of execution the contract provision at issue could result in unfair surprise and was oppressive to the allegedly disadvantaged party; and 2) Whether a merchant seeking to terminate a business agreement must act in good faith by practicing honesty in fact and observing reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in that trade.

    Read More

  • Pearson Vs Shalala Summary

    1847 Words  | 8 Pages

    Shalala, the FDA (defendant) did not authorize the appellants to include the four claims on the label of the dietary supplements with the reasoning that the scientific evidence is not enough to meet the requirements of significant scientific agreement11. In response to this, the appellant argued that the FDA never explained the term significant or on what basis the FDA measures the significant evidence and thus violated their constitutional rights under First Amendment by not providing an explanation with reasoning for rejecting the appellants proposed health claims11. Also, the appellants argued that under Administrative Procedure Act the FDA is obliged to articulate a standard good deal more concrete than the undefined “significant scientific agreement”11. Therefore, the court hold that the FDA’s interpretation regarding the four claims is invalid as the FDA did not provide a valid definition of scientific

    Read More

  • Cheeseman V. Jan Case

    805 Words  | 4 Pages

    minutes the families where negotiating with Jan to take their case, but their negotiations failed due to lack of data and research. They did not know who was to blame for the cause of the leukemia of their children. But, because there was no tangible being or entity to attach the case to, Jan felt he should not take the case and risk losing it. • By walking away he ended the negotiation. • Cheeseman wanted use rule 11 to prevented case from forward, but his motion was denied when the judge ruled against him.

    Read More

  • How Did Kevin Trudeau Put On Trial For Misleading Infomercials?

    387 Words  | 2 Pages

    45 and 52.” (http://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/120823_trudeaubrief.pdf) The district court unified the actions, and Trudeau agreed to the entry of an exploratory ruling that prohibited him from promoting the products as effective cures for cancer or other diseases while the lawsuit was still undecided. (http://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/120823_trudeaubrief.pdf) Mr. Trudeau still continued with his advertising campaign, using the claims banned by the exploratory ruling.

    Read More

  • Gossard Vs Adia Services Case Analysis

    1186 Words  | 5 Pages

    The appeals court placed its emphasis on these elements of tortious interference: (1) “the existence of a business relationship (2) knowledge of the relationship on the part of the defendant; (3) an intentional and unjustified interference with the relationship by the defendant; and (4) damage to the plaintiff as a result of the breach of the relationship.” Additionally, the court sought to find if the tort elements were congruent with the following assertions made by Gossard. Nursefinders and Gossard had an agreement that prohibited a parent or affiliate of Nursefinders from providing similar services within Gossard’s territory. Adia knew of the agreement prior to its purchase. Adia purchased Star Med, a direct competitor operating in Gossard’s franchise territory.

    Read More

  • Case Study: ADT Vs. Boca Raton

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    Then we have reasonableness is regarding to the offer and accepted in the corner wall which means that aspect of mutuality, is basically mutual understanding of what a contract is. The ADT case falls under Diversity Jurisdiction because the amount asked by Shakeri was over $75,000. Since the plaintiffs were from Texas, and ADT Security Services Headquarters were located in Boca Raton, Florida, the part of the jurisdiction

    Read More

  • Principles Of Contract: Offer And Bilateral Offers

    3946 Words  | 16 Pages

    for Unilateral offer and Bilateral offer. 1. Advertisements for unilateral offer – Offer to the public at large Offers can be addressed to the general public and are accepted when the offer is acted upon a member of the general public. An important exception to the general rule that advertisements are merely invitations to treat is where there is an offer in relation to a unilateral offer contained in an advert i.e. where the offeror makes a promise in return for an act. Ali’s advertisement is considered as a unilateral offer since the contract is based on being automatically accepted without the need for negotiations as he states in the advert.

    Read More

  • Uniform Commercial Code Essay

    451 Words  | 2 Pages

    Terms which the communications of the parties concur or which are generally put forward in a writing expected by the parties as a last expression of their agreement regarding such terms as are incorporated in that may not be denied by confirmation of any former declaration or of a coexisting oral understanding yet may be clarified or supplemented. (https://www.law.cornell.edu) Additionally, necessities put forward in Section 2-201 must first be fulfilled if the agreement as adjusted is inside of its stipulations. Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code. A case of this segment can be Fairway Mach.

    Read More

  • Doctrine Of Promissory Estoppel Case Study

    1544 Words  | 7 Pages

    Is past consideration regarded as adequate and sufficient when determining the validity of a contract? B. LAW Doctrine of promissory estoppel In contract law, it is a general rule that where a party to the contract makes a representation in form of a promise to another party relating to the contract, such party is restrained from reneging regardless of nonexistence of consideration (Jill, 2012, p. 148).

    Read More

  • Death Of A Salesman Respect Analysis

    225 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Arthur Miller’s Play, Death of a Salesman, through his character Linda Loman, the author implies that all people deserve respect no matter what. Is this true though do all people deserve respect? Whether they are good or bad do they get respect Miller states his thoughts “Linda- Either he’s your father and you pay him that respect, or else you’re not to come here” (39). Here, Miller suggested that even if you do not like someone they deserve respect such as biff hates Willy but Linda acknowledges the fact that everybody needs respect and scolds Biff much like society “scolds” someone for being disrespectful to a person.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA

    1045 Words  | 5 Pages

    Name: Patel Mukeshkumar Paper # JANET M. TURNER, Appellant v. HERSHEY CHOCOLATE USA Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim. The appellant’s essential accommodation claim went to trial, but court excluded evidence regarding disability.

    Read More

More about Five Presumptions Of The Behaviour Of Parties Involved In A Contract

Open Document