preview

Flammang The Taste Of Civilization Analysis

Better Essays
“Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honor preferring one another” (Romans 12:10). Long ago, there was a time when courtesy emerged. During that time, civilization valued standards, morals, etiquette, and politeness. Certain regulations existed for speech, which ensured no one was confused or unnecessarily offended. There were also numerous laws regarding behavior, which made sure everyone’s needs were cared for and no one was harmed, insulted, or excluded. Instead of attacking those they opposed with, the general public commonly showed respect and profound concern for one another. However, in today’s society, a crucial key that enhances civilization is fading. That significant key is known as civility. Today,…show more content…
Reverence for others is declining. This matter has triggered many individuals to share their perspective on this controversial subject. Janet A. Flammang’s “The Taste of Civilization: Food, Politics, and Civil Society” and Gregory Orr’s “Return to Hayneville” both explore how civility is a dying practice that is weakening civil society. Flammang’s essay utilizes how civility is the vital component in enhancing civilization. Flammang’s essay utilizes profound concepts and techniques to demonstrate how the practice of civility should not only be applied on the dinner table. She clarifies that humans should practice the art of civility in order to avoid conflict. Moreover, in “Return to Hayneville,” Orr emphasizes how the reliance of civility can only go so far in ending…show more content…
But, in today’s society, humans are not entitled to their own personal freedom. There are countless factors that are not enabling civilians to acquire their rights to personal freedom. For instance, harming or murdering an individual just due to sheer dislike is taking away that individual’s rights. True personal freedom exists when every individual has complete authority of their own life. However, not everyone is entitled to their own freedom in the essay “Return to Hayneville.” Throughout Orr’s experience, he reveals that when he is forced onto the fairgrounds, “a black kid maybe ten or twelve sat next to me…a state patrolman stopped in front of the boy. He looked him over for a minute, then ordered him to take off the pin he was wearing—one of those movement buttons that said freedom now or one man, one vote…Swallow it, the guard said…If the kid tried to swallow it, the pin would choke him or pierce his throat and lodge there until he bled to death in agony” (Orr 222). The practice of civility is seen to enable everyone to live their lives however they wish so long as the decisions they make does not lead to the risk of another person’s right. However, that is not demonstrated in Orr’s experience. That child did not have power over his own actions. The officer took control of the child’s freedom.
Get Access