Pedro Kuzma
Mr. Mangual
IB Psychology
9 december 2015
Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one cognitive process
Cognition can be defined as the set of mental abilities and processes we have that relate to our knowledge, attention, memory, reasoning and all of the processes that go on in our brain. It can be: conscious or unconscious, concrete or abstract and intuitive or conceptual. Cognition can also use the existing knowledge we have to generate new knowledge. The Cognitive level of analysis studies the processes of our mind and how our cognitive processes guide our behavior. Our emotions can have a huge impact on our cognition, and the Flashbulb Memory Theory by Brown and Kulik (1977) demonstrates that.
Flashbulb memories (FBM) are a special kind of memories that are influenced by emotion. Memories linked with highly emotional events seem to be recorded in the brain like a photo,
…show more content…
This theory explains to us why some of our memories are more vivid than others, and can be remembered better over time, although it can't quite explain why these memories are sometimes no more accurate than others. The FBM theory has been the basis for many researches and studies, and has been modified with time, due to new discoveries. The central idea of the theory, stating that emotional events are remembered better than non-emotional ones has been proven and is accepted, but only as long as these events have some personal relevance. There are also some limitations to this theory. The name of the theory, "Flashbulb" memory, has been proven to transmit the wrong idea. This name suggests that the memory is saved as a photo, which has been proven to be wrong, by Neisser and Harsch. Also, FBM, is a reconstructed memory, and as the memory involves the person's emotion, this may affect the way the memory is reconstructed, especially if it is discussed with other people, or if the event does not have any particular personal
She mentions that these “dangerous” memories are presented in legal cases and explains her part in two of which she was apart of. In the first case, the photos of Thomas Sohponow who was mistakenly identified as the murderer of a young woman during the identification process were arrayed simultaneously rather than sequentially giving witnesses an easier target. This practice is not reliable as it allows witnesses to easily be persuaded by their naïve “memories” of a person and unfortunately in his case resulted in four years in prison. The second case Michael Kliman who was an elementary school teacher was accused of molesting a 6th grade student based on “repressed memories”. After two decades the student who “recovered” her memories laid charges on Kliman, which makes the case questionable since it could be difficult to justify the validity of a “repressed memory”.
The experiment showed how our memory can be easily mislead even if we saw it with our own eyes. I believe Gould’s essay is indeed convincing when it comes to whether or not to doubt what people believe they remember is actually
The study pioneered by Sigmund Freud of the “effects of subconscious feelings and early childhood experiences on behavior” (Harrison, p. 18) When talking to the black women on the bench, Forrest mentions how it's weird how you remember some memories, but others not at
In contrast, in the spontaneously recovered memory type, people get a reminder (for example a salient retrieval cue) of a traumatic event, of which they believe that they had not thought about for several years. People with spontaneously recovered memories have always remembered their abuse experience, but they interpret it in a different manner
In conclusion, I believe that memories in general are real, and theorized about negative and positive
Especially memories that have no physical evidence to prove the truth. Everyone is stuck in a paradox of conflicting thoughts and
memories the method can be used in psychological institutions, to help those whom are traumatized to stifle the memory and prevent it from affecting their future behaviors. Additionally, a better grasp of how memory, is encoded or lost will provide better aid to those with disabilities linked with memory. Flashbulb memories are defined as memories of emotionally significant events that people usually remember with more vivid details and accuracy than normal events (King, 2013). Psychologists Lanciano, Curci, and Semin (2010) conducted two studies investigating the accuracy and the amount of details remember of flashbulb memories, in which they determined those placed under stressful and highly emotional conditions do in fact recall the event
Moreover, “a behavioural syndrome results showing not only semantic-memory impairment but also particular difficulty remembering past events as personal happenings” (Tulving, 1989). Lastly, in Endel Tulving’s conclusion to his article he states “traditionally held views about the unity of memory are no longer tenable. A more appropriate view seems to be that of multiple memory systems. Remembering one’s past is a different, perhaps more advanced, achievement of the brain than simply knowing about it” ( Tulving,
When one allows themselves to see past the merkiness of unreliability in a memory and look solely at what that memory means, the validity of the memory is left. Furthermore, a memory does not have to be a word by word, detail by detail, account of an event to hold a degree of validity for
Summary “Flashbulb memories (FBM) are highly vivid and long-lasting memories for events that are emotionally significant and personally important” (as cited in Kraha and Boals, 2014). Most of the previous research on this phenomenon solely examined negative events and their capabilities to produce vivid negative flashbulb memories. Some of the previous research also focused on comparing similarities between positive and negative events. Although researchers have proved that flashbulb memories not only form from negative events but also neutral and positive ones, there haven 't been many studies on the development of positive flashbulb memories.
Introduction “Of what use is the memory of facts, if not to serve as an example of good or of evil?” (Alfred de Vigny). Memory encodes various pieces of information that can be utilized in an enormous amount of situations to benefit people. However, memory is also fallible. It alters and creates new memories, changing the original encoded data for unknown reasons.
Functional or psychogenic amnesia is caused by an emotional shock such as being the victim of a brutal crime, sexual abuse and child abuse. Fundamentally, any unbearable life event that causes extreme psychological stress and internal dispute could be the cause of functional or psychogenic
Like a jigsaw puzzle; such as an interviewer may ask a person in a crime scene to assemble pieces of memory of the traumatic event. Frederic Bartlett’s theory of reconstructive memory helps us understand the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Bartlett says that memory recall is focused to subjective interpretation reliant on our cultural norms, values and the awareness of the world we have. Memory is believed to work like a camera, we store information like the camera is recording and playing the clip back is like remembering what was recorded; in the same format it was set. Though it doesn’t work like a camera as people construct and store information in a manner that makes it understanding to them.
The cognitive level of analysis aims to study how the inner processes of the mind processes information gained, and how they are interpreted and applied into the real world. Within this level of analysis, it was found that the cognitive and biological factors of our mind influence how we feel, or in other words, our emotions. Emotion can be defined as the body’s response to any specific situation. As all human beings can express how they feel through facial expressions, this suggests that emotions are biological rather than cognitive. However, emotions can be dependent on both the cognitive and biological factors of our body.
According to Halbwaches, studying memory is not a matter of reflecting on the properties of the subjective mind, rather memory is a matter of how minds work together in society, how their operations are structured by social arrangements: “It is in society that people normally acquire their memories. It is also in society that they recall, recognize, and localize their memories” (Halbwachs, 1992, p.38). Halbwaches argued that it is impossible for individuals to remember any coherent outside of their group contexts. Group memberships provide the materials for memory and prod the individual into recalling particular events and into forgetting others. (Lo, 2012)