ipl-logo

Flaws Of The Constitution Dbq

1417 Words6 Pages

Following the American Revolution, America was divided into two political groups: the federalists and the anti-federalists. Both parties believed the United states future was in the best interest of the new nation. While the anti-federalists believed in power to the individual states, the federalists believed in a strong central government to body the nation. Prior to 1789, the Articles of Confederation is what held the nation together, despite the immense problems that arose from it. The document was formed in order to equally divide powers in America. Unfortunately, it did the complete opposite. In 1789, the newly revised Constitution of the United States was formed to fix the pre-existing problems. The Constitution gave powers that were …show more content…

The Great Compromise was created soon after which appointed the number of representatives in the House of Representatives according the size of their state. Because smaller states rejected this due to the biased power towards the large states, it was agreed upon that the senate would have the same number of votes regardless of state size. In the southern states, 30 percent of the population consisted of slaves, according to Lowi, Etal (2014). The northern states believed that they should not count towards the population count which would give them more votes in the House of Representatives. Delegates agreed on the Three-Fifths Compromise which would count every five slaves as three people. The slaves were not allowed to vote but they counted towards the population of the states they resided in. Northerns were still against this but realized that this would be the closest they would come to compromise and without it, they would never agree to a new government. According to Lowi, Etal (2014), “This political significance of the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths compromise was to reinforce the unity of those who sought the creation of a new government.” The Great Compromise reassured those who believed their location would lessen their impact on the newly formed government. The Three-Fifths Compromise would disband the tensions between the north and the south to finally come to an agreement. They were now ready to move past their differences and come together as one nation in the best interests of themselves politically and

Show More
Related

  • Explain What Was The Compromise Regarding Representation To Appease The Plantation Elites

    1050 Words  | 5 Pages

    lha Kaleem Emplid-23406195 AMERICAN POLITICS & GOVERNMENT‐ UNIT 1 EXAMINATION, SPRING 2017 Unit 1- Question 1 What was the “compromise” between two different plans in creating the legislature? What was the compromise regarding representation to appease the plantation elites? Explain. PG 48-49 In 1978, two plans were put forth regarding how each state in the union? would be represented in the national legislature.

    Read More

  • Unit 2 American War Essay Questions And Answers

    1419 Words  | 6 Pages

    Therefore, slaves are to be counted as three fifths vote for representation, because slaves made up a large portion of the population in the southern states. Therefore, the south wanted the slaves to count as part of the population so that they would have more power in the house of representatives. The north did not want the slaves to count as part of the population because they did not want the north to have

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The Constitution Of 1787 Dbq Essay

    891 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Great Compromise would seek sure to that. The Great Compromise would make sure that all states had an equal vote in the Senate. All states were allowed two votes in the Senate (Doc. D). As for the House of Representatives, every tate had their number of representatives based on the population of that state (Doc. D). As in, every State would receive no more than one representative for every thirty-thousand (Doc. D).

    Read More

  • The Three-Fifth Compromises Of The Northern And Southern States

    926 Words  | 4 Pages

    Delegates from the north opposed slavery and only wanted to count those that were free. Northern delegates argued that slaves where property and why should they be counted, if slaves where counted would other property be counted as well (Jillson, 43)? The southern states on the other hand, supported slavery and wanted to count slaves at their actual number. The compromise was counting all other persons (anyone who was not free) as only three-fifths of their actual number. This meant for every five slaves it equaled three free persons.

    Read More

  • Constitution Vs Constitution Dbq Essay

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    America has been shaped in many different ways, but one of the most important is the way the country is governed. Once the Revolutionary War was over, the United States of America needed to figure out a new way to govern their country because when the states had more power than the national government, the country was weak. The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal Government rather than the state government because the Articles of Confederation were weak, the Constitution was strong, and the Constitution was more likely to succeed than the Articles. The Articles of Confederation were used to govern America during the Revolutionary War.

    Read More

  • Reasons For The Flaws Under The Articles Of Confederation

    1149 Words  | 5 Pages

    In 1777, after the American Revolution had ended, the new United States of America adopted the Articles of Confederation as the new central government. The Articles made the government weak, powerless, and vulnerable out of fear for tyranny. This system had many flaws and created a lack of unity between the states. As a result, the Constitution of the United States was developed in 1789 to solve many of the problems that arose from the Articles. This new system re-constructed the government into three branches and created a system of checks and balances to prevent the government from becoming corrupt.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Framers

    1364 Words  | 6 Pages

    They also “included the three-fifths clause which states that in deciding how many representatives a state could send to the house of representatives, the number would be determined by counting free persons, servants, in three-fifths of all other persons { slaves }. Congress was to use the same count for collecting taxes from the states”. Indians were excluded. Finally the framers agreed to include the fugitive slave clause which states that persons who escape from slavery to a state where slavery was prohibited “ shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labour may be due”. The compromise on slavery was designed to satisfy the demands of some of the southern states these states would not have supported the constitution without this agreement.

    Read More

  • Flaws Embedded Into The Constitution Essay

    972 Words  | 4 Pages

    Flaws Embedded into the Constitution When the architects of the constitution wrote about what should institute a fair and just nation with some overarching principles, they simply couldn't anticipate all the contemporary problems the nation faces today. They had no way of knowing the dramatic social reforms to come that would include movements like LGBTQ, Black Lives Matter, and Feminism. The framers attempted to solve this conundrum using the concept of a “living document.” They made it so that future generations to come would be able to make amendments to the constitution in order to keep up with their generation’s wants and needs. However, perfection was far from achieved and the result was a flawed political document.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Influence The Constitution

    1018 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Northern states, smaller in comparison to the south, already did not have as much representation and political power as the southern states. Therefore, the compromise to them was unnecessary, and they felt they would have all the power and dominate in the polls and decisions. Considering the different views the two already had based on slavery, this alarmed the northern states. However, as time passed, the Three-Fifths Compromise would not provide the advantage the slave owning south had hoped. The Northern states grew more rapidly in terms of population and ended up being opposing political power to others.

    Read More

  • American Citizens Dbq

    74 Words  | 1 Pages

    Not long after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the American citizens began to disagree about how the United States should operate. They were conflicted about how much power the federal government should possess, as stated in Chapter 10 of History in the Making, which says that “at heart, Federalists and Republicans disagreed about how much power to vest in the central government or, conversely, about how capable the people were in governing

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Three Fifths Compromise

    635 Words  | 3 Pages

    From a northern standpoint, they wanted the slaves to be equal as cattle. Cattle could not vote, therefore, they believed slaves should not have the right to vote or even be counted as a person. All in all, the different regions of the states had different standpoints which led to the Three-Fifths Compromise. The Three-Fifths Compromise was added to come to provide a partially-equal agreement on were slaves going to be included in the counting of the population for the number of representatives for the House.

    Read More

  • The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

    1593 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

    Read More

  • Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan Essay

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    The larger states, in favor of the Virginia Plan, were unsure of whether or not slaves were to be counted as part of the population or not. The Southern states wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population, but to also be considered as property, in case the new government was to levy taxes on each state on the basis of population. They also believed that even if slaves were to be counted as people, they still would not be granted citizenship or have the right to vote. Because the majority of the North did not have slaves, the South was in favor of having

    Read More

  • Analyze The Arguments In Favour Of The Three Fifths

    613 Words  | 3 Pages

    The three-fifths compromise was a system to determine state representation in Congress by counting each enslaved person as three-fifths of a person. Proposed in 1787 by James Wilson and Roger Sherman, it clearly showed the strength of the proslavery forces during the time of the United States Constitutional Convention. Since the Virginia Plan was rejected, the three-fifths compromise was enacted as a new framework for the government. The Southern states demanded more representation politically because their population was vastly increased due to slavery. The Northerners viewed one free man as one vote and one slave not counting as part of the population while the Southerners viewed one free man as one vote as well as one slave as one vote.

    Read More

More about Flaws Of The Constitution Dbq

Open Document