Ford Pinto Case Study Summary

1. Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case)
On August 10, 1978, three high school young ladies ceased to refuel the 1973 Ford Pinto vehicle they were driving. In the wake of topping off, the driver freely reapplied the gas top which in this manner tumbled off as they headed down U. S. Thruway 33. Attempting to recover the top, the young ladies ceased in the correct path of the parkway bear since there was no space on the expressway for autos to securely pull off the roadway. Presently, a van weighing more than 400 pounds and adjusted with an inflexible board for a front guard was going at fifty five miles a hour and stuck the halted Pinto. The two travelers passed on at the scene when the auto burst into flares. The driver was shot out and kicked the bucket presently in the clinic. Assessing the van not long after the mischance, the police discovered open brew containers, weed and caffeine pills inside

2. List all indicators (including stated "problems") that something is not as expected or as desired.
In May of 1968, the Ford Motor Company, in view of a suggestion by then VP Lee Iacocca, chose to present a subcompact auto and create it locally. With an end goal to pick up an extensive

Risk/utility investigation at that point created out of a similar adjusting thinking, connected to decide risk in the region of item plan. In these kinds of cases, courts must decide if a maker ought to be held at risk if merchandise are "defective" because of creation or circulation. In past cases, courts experienced issues here. In Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.,42 a 1963 case, the court expressed that the litigant was not ready to see the likelihood for damage until after the damage happened and by conventional carelessness benchmarks ought to be found not liable.43 This kind of conclusion pained the courts, since the weight on the offended party appeared to be relatively