ipl-logo

Foreclosure Issues In The CIBC Wood Gundy Case

824 Words4 Pages

There were a number of serious disclosure issues in this case that had to be resolved which in turn led to other, fairly large, party discoveries. CIBC’s defense to the wrongful dismissal of Mr. Saturley is just cause. Mr. Saturley was accused of causing trades for many clients without their consent, and that he had performed a task which was outside of his duties to perform. Throughout the trial Mr. Saturley had been pushing for details of the accusations towards him. CIBC Wood Gundy responded to Saturley’s actions by saying that it intends to prove that he performed trades on behalf of numerous clients who did not, give him authority to do so. Mr. Saturley refused to admit that the alleged unauthorized trading proved just cause for his …show more content…

Along with the list they also disclosed documents in its possession respecting that client. Despite their willingness the provide proof of their just cause, this resulted in proving that CIBC Wood Gundy did not anticipate proving isolated incidents of unauthorized trading. The motion for particulars was eventually dismissed, except for the fact that Mr. Saturley was authorized to produce the correspondence at trial as particulars of the CIBC Wood Gundy defense. The same subject is now brought forward under the Rules for discovery and disclosure. Ms. Wilma Ditchfield is a senior official of CIBC Wood Gundy, she was closely involved in the events leading up to Mr. Saturley's dismissal, and she is the person designated under the Rules to manage disclosure by the defendant in this suit. She confirmed that Saturley made a large numbers of trades for many clients without being granted their confirmed consent for such trades. (Saturley v. CIBC World Markets Inc., 2011 NSSC 310 (CanLII), …show more content…

Regardless, Saturley was well aware of the his positions code of ethics, as well as the seriousness of unauthorized discretionary trading. It turns out that this is not the first time he had been punished for such actions; he had also been reprimanded for discretionary trading in 2004, investigated again in 2007 and had received numerous CIBC bulletins warning against discretionary trading. He had several warnings, and yet continued to perform such

Show More
Related

  • Summary: The Case Of R. V. Wood

    787 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the case of R. v. Wood, 2007 ABQB 503, Susanne Lynn Wood appeals her September 8, 2006, conviction on one count of impaired driving, contrary to s. 253(a) of the Criminal Code, where on September 8 the appeal was quashed, and she was convicted. On May 31, 2004, the witness David Godziuk phoned the Edmonton police of a possible impaired driver, after the Appellant’s vehicle almost hit his vehicle. David Godziuk followed the Appellant’s vehicle, observing consist exceeded speed, suddenly braking, random lane changes, and tailgate others. Constable Smith of the Edmonton police service was dispatched to investigate said driver, as he approached the Appellant’s vehicle he followed her for two blocks observing the vehicle swerve left to right, once Constable Smith turned on his emergency lights the driver abruptly stepped on the breaks and stopped the vehicle (R. v. Wood, 2007). Constable Smith approached the vehicle

    Read More

  • Legal Brief For Andrew Carnegie Summary

    512 Words  | 3 Pages

    Legal Brief for Andrew Carnegie As the prosecutor of Andrew Carnegie, I would like to state the reasons of why Carnegie should be found guilty of being a robber baron. Carnegie’s refusal to raise worker’s pay by 30% after the company’s profited have increased nearly sixty percent lead to one of the most serious strike in the United States history, the Homestead Strike. Carnegie was also a member of the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club, which was blamed for the Johnstown flood that killed over two thousand people. Lastly, Carnegie was one of the many companies that utilized the vertical integration strategy which drove many smaller companies out of business with marketing tactics that were considered unlawful.

    Read More

  • Mellivan And Melin Case Study

    307 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. Identify all the options. James Sullivan and his partner Melin, had the option of giving a true statement about Francis case to U.S District court in Brooklyn. 2. Identify all those affected by the decision.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Lindsay G. Robertson's Conquest By Law

    1879 Words  | 8 Pages

    Lindsay G. Robertson's Conquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of Their Lands centers on the landmark 1823 Supreme Court case Johnson vs. M'Intosh. Robertson's research provides previously undiscovered knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the case, placing the case in a new context both politically and judicially. Robertson tells the story of a costly mistake, one made by the American judicial system but paid for by an indigenous people who to this day suffer from the effects of American settlement. As reviewer Christopher Tomlin writes, "Robertson's narrative is far less concerned with parsing its legal doctrine, than with the historical circumstances of the case itself." Robertson begins his

    Read More

  • Moncrieffe V. Holder Case Study

    273 Words  | 2 Pages

    Because the arrest and drug conviction were not challenged in the federal removal proceedings, the Court in Moncrieffe v. Holder did not have before it the full set of facts surrounding the state criminal prosecution of Adrian Moncrieffe. However, examination of the facts surrounding the criminal case offers important lessons about how the criminal justice system works in combination with the modern immigration removal machinery to disparately impact communities of color. By all appearances, the traffic stop that led to Moncrieffe’s arrest is a textbook example of racial profiling.3 Over the last few decades, the modern immigration enforcement system has evolved into a criminal immigration removal system, with the U.S. government frequently

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons For The Dismissal Of The UDTPA

    251 Words  | 2 Pages

    B. DR. STOUT’S ALLEGATIONS DO NOT AFFECT COMMERCE The allegations made by Dr. Stout, even if taken as true, do not affect commerce. Accordingly, dismissal of the UDTPA claim is appropriate.

    Read More

  • What Is The Gregory Johnson Case Of Homosexuality?

    776 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gregory Johnson was a student at Lincoln Christian College (LCC) from September 1976 to March 1981. He was enrolled in a five-year program to prepare him for a career teaching sacred music. Johnson has completed all of his course requirements and fully paid his tuition for each year; however, LCC has repeatedly refused to grant Johnson his diploma based on a charge that Johnson might be homosexual which arose during Johnson's last semester at LCC when, Linda Heppner, another student told Thomas Ewald, LCC's dean of students, that Johnson might be homosexual. Based on those accusations, LCC through Heppner told Johnson that he would only graduate if he sought counseling from Kent Paris. Relying upon the assurance of graduation and afraid that

    Read More

  • Airbus Affair By Brian Mulroney

    668 Words  | 3 Pages

    The very long and expensive 16 million dollar public inquiry into former Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney's dealings with corrupt businessmen Karlheinz Schreiber can best be described as a relationship between two dishonest men who ended up playing a very expensive game of blame with each other at the expense of the Canadian taxpayer. The entire “Airbus affair” plays like a crime movie - envelopes filled with cash, secret meetings, a Swiss bank account and criminal dealings. The problem for the Canadian public is that the affair is reality TV, and one of the main characters was the leader of the Federal Government of Canada.

    Read More

  • Charles Thomas Sell: A Case Study

    180 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before the original case started the petitioner and dentist, Charles Thomas Sell, whom had a prior history of mental illness was charged with submitting false insurance claims to receive payments on May 16, 1997. The government then issued a motion for a psychiatric examination of Mr. Sells to determine whether or not he was competent to stand trial. After the evaluation Mr. Sell was ruled to be competent to stand trial but determined that Sells might have a psychotic episode in the future. On November 1997, an indictment was issued to charge Charles Sell and his partner with multiple counts of mail fraud, Medicaid fraud, and money laundering. Approximately six months later Charles Sells and his wife were indicted once more with intimidating

    Read More

  • London Whale Case Summary

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    4. Poor CIO Judgment, Execution and Escalation in the first quarter of 2012 CIO established competing and inconsistent priorities for the SCP without adequately exploring or understanding how the priorities would be simultaneously addressed. The decisions on priorities were poorly reviewed and casually made. This caused the quick increase in traders and losses. Besides, the trading strategies that were designed in an effort to achieve the various priorities were poorly conceived and not fully understood by CIO and other CIO personnel.

    Read More

  • Income Smoothing Case Study

    1491 Words  | 6 Pages

    This proves that throughout the case, Cendant Corporation wasn’t acting fully ethical nor with the desired fiduciary actions to their investors and the auditing team in this case being Ernst&Young. Aside from the trust being broken apart between both, there was never a sign of an internal control inside Cedant. Therefore, there shows that the corporate governance for Cendant Corporation didn’t have signs of existence as well. Most frauds that were occurring before the implementation of the SOX-2002, had top management such as in Cendant that didn’t have care for the ethical performances as much as in today’s corporate world with more regulations in hand by the government. At the end, Cendant had filings against them concerning their corporate governance

    Read More

  • Who Is Katherine Branch's At Fault In The Salem Witch Trial

    926 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Richard Godbeer’s telling of the dealings of 1692 in Stamford, Connecticut, a servant with a name of Katherine Branch, who is seventeen years old, suddenly started experiencing fits prematurely according to the information of the happenings in Salem. Godbeer records her master’s (Daniel Wescot) and mistress' (Abigail Wescot) endeavors to locate a clarification, either supernatural or natural, and the ultimate perturbed settling on witchcraft; the relatively sluggish progression by which Branch came to lay blame on Elizabeth Clawson and Mercy Disborough as her harassers; and Goodwives Clawson and Disborough's testings and final discharges. Katherine Branch’s case was treated with intense skepticism, since the judges, ministers and the formal

    Read More

  • Ethics Case Study: Monsanto's Code Of Ethics

    1731 Words  | 7 Pages

    This was important because although CVS did not admit fault, they did pay a settlement, which would show the stakeholders that some subjects, the company is willing to sweep under the rug. CVS’s reactive approach to this situation could again disappoint its customers and decrease trust. CVS denied responsibility and did less than what would be considered required (Thorne, Ferrell, & Ferrell,

    Read More

  • How Is Justice Served In To Kill A Mockingbird

    546 Words  | 3 Pages

    “This case is not a difficult one, it requires no minute sifting of complicated facts, but it does require you to be sure beyond all reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. To begin with, this case should have never came to trial. This case is as simple as black and white. (203) In To Kill A Mockingbird Harper Lee presents the idea that justice was not served for blacks in the 1930’s because Tom Robertson was not given a nondiscriminatory trial nor do blacks get the same rights as oppose to if you were white.

    Read More

  • Legal Burden Of Proof

    2248 Words  | 9 Pages

    Question 1 (1) The burden of proof means obligation to prove. There are two principle kinds of burden in legal trial; they are • legal burden • evidential burden. Legal Burden The legal burden can be defined as the obligation imposed on a party by a rule of law to prove a fact in issue in order to convince the court.

    Read More

More about Foreclosure Issues In The CIBC Wood Gundy Case

Open Document