Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Issue 6- Does the Act violate the Procedural Due Process? Conclusion 1.

Some people want to make a difference with our dysfunction. A great organization that is helping with the dysfunction is United Republic. According to their site they have an American Anti Corruption Act which is setting standards for city, states, and federal laws which prevent money from corrupting America’s government. I believe this is important because it stopped political bribery and secret money between politicians.

Political corruption is one political issue is happening with many countries all around the world and the United States. This issue makes the government has a lack of transparency. The political system has been weakening. People in society do not have the freedom to check the government and cannot protect their community. Political corruption makes politics in those nation has less stability. Both political ideologies liberalism and traditional conservatism can against in this corruption. Liberalism is very strong to support the people have freedom by creating the rule of law. Traditional conservatism focuses on protecting the nation and creating a good cultural and social value in those countries. These political ideologies can make the people

Moe and Howell offer compelling reasons as to why unilateral action is even a concern. They point to the combination of constitutional ambiguity in the level to which presidents are able to act. The multitude of statues, clauses, and loopholes give the executive room to take action in a number

One of the well-known federal fraud and abuse statutes in the United States is the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which greatly influences business relationships in the pharmaceutical, healthcare and medical device sectors. This statute is an Anti-Corruption law, which is designed to protect beneficiaries of the federal health care program from money influence on various referral decisions. Thus, this law helps in guarding against an increase in costs, overutilization and poor quality services. However, this law needs some modifications to become more efficient to all the U.S citizens. The lawmakers in the country should take the initiative of amending this bill so as to ensure that they adequately represent the interests of those people who

The United States government is a well functioning system on the outside, but there is still a sizeable amount of corruption of the political and monetary majorities over the minorities that needs to be

Attempting to enact significant legislation requires Congress and the White House to compromise and anticipate what others will approve of and pass. When a bill successfully passes both houses of Congress, which has become increasingly difficult due to party polarization and radical groups within the House of Representatives and the Senate, it then goes to the president for signing. This is a lengthy process, and in order for groups of people with opposing views to settle in agreement on a measure, a great deal of negotiation is often required. This can result in a piece of legislation that is a compromised, diluted version of its original form that is not an effective solution to the initial problem. Vague, weak legislation often necessitates further action by the other two branches of government in order to interpret and execute it properly.

Innocent citizen have been placed in jail for no absolute reason. Everyone should have a fair treatment in court. I ask the United States Congress to please put an end to this. We should have an individual authority that’s loyal to the law and knows the laws by heart, other than a judge, in the proximity of the court. This way, whenever someone blameless is being accused wrongly in the court, the person can acknowledge it and report the incident.

For an example, if there is a community that has a plant near their neighborhood and they are polluting their water supply. Homeowners will notice that their water supply are polluted with the plant’s chemical. They will most likely take this up with their elected officials. Then congress gets an issue that a plant is polluting into a water supply and the people would like this business to fix this problem. Now congress has to decide if they should or should not regulate

“The power of Congress over interstate commerce is not confined to the regulation of commerce among the states. It extends to those activities, which affect interstate commerce, or

But many countries like USA has an Act in place that outlaws the practice of bribe payment to government official for their gain in

Transparency International (2016) has ranked the nation #8 in the world in its Corruption Perception Index, showcasing a low amount of corruption. Furthermore, the country is ‘the most globalised’ in the world, with a score of 92.84 in the KOF Globalisation index (ETH Zurich, 2017). This signals a high degree of political openness to global economic, social and political integration. Likewise, The Heritage Foundation states that “Openness to global trade and investment is well established, and the overall regulatory environment remains transparent and efficient.” (Index of Economic Freedom, 2017).

The push Walmart is making to build stores in Mexico, South America, and China means that Walmart management in those countries may face the temptation to bribe foreign officials to give Walmart preferential treatment to zoning and other matters that require foreign governmental approval (Ferrell 414). Walmart has already faced this issue with its Walmex branch of operations, which has been accused of bribing Mexican officials to streamline zoning and permit issues that are often more burdensome in Mexico than in the United States (Ferrell 414). Certainly bribery may be more common in the developing countries that Walmart intends to expand its operations into. Therefore, Walmart officials are likely to continue to face the issue of how to ensure that its management of overseas operations maintains ethical standards and avoids the temptation of bribing government officials to give Walmart preferential treatment (Ferrell

Anderson (2003), there are several implications of this concept of public policy. It refers to a purposive course of action undertaken by a government in dealing with certain problems or matters of concern. Firstly, public policies are purposive or goal-oriented actions rather than random behaviours or chance occurrences. Secondly, they can be courses or patterns of measures taken over time by governmental authorities rather than separate and distinct decisions. Thirdly, they are in response to policy demands and involve other actors, such as individuals, groups of citizens, groups of representatives, or legislators and other public officials, in action or inaction on certain public issues.

Regulations that the government implement, licensing for example, increases the barrier of entry into the market and decreases ways for the traders to gratify consumer demand. This case is prevalent in the monopoly market. The market is sometimes best to decide how much and what to produce since it has better information and knowledge of the consumers compared to the government. Economic decisions may also not be competent when the government is motivated by political power rather than economic imperatives. Sometimes, economic policies are designed to retain power rather than to ensure maximum efficiency in the economy.