President Jimmy Carter signed the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 into law on December 19, 1977. The law was a reaction to bribery and corruption occurring in United States businesses. This paper will address many questions such as how does the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 impact society and business? Is the policy ethical? Has the policy been successful and efficient since its implementation? These questions will be answered throughout the essay in four different sections. First, I will discuss the history of the law, and if it was a market or government failure. Second, I will discuss the implementation of the law. Third, I will address the impact the law has had on the business world specifically and society. Finally, I will …show more content…
It is considered a response to market failure because the FCPA stopped corporations from becoming monopolies by halting negative externalities and information asymmetry from occurring through the illegal bribes being made to foreign officials. Market failure is essentially when a company pursues their interest alone and use society’s resources inefficiently (Jasso, 2015). With the bribes being made to foreign officials in return for business overseas, and accounting books being “cooked”, certain companies were getting an unfair advantage in the market (“A Resource Guide to the FCPA…”, 2012, p.3) This unfair advantage was about to cause negative externalities internationally, and information asymmetry. A perfect example of how the FCPA prevents monopolies or market failure is through the case of Pfizer in 2012. The company Pfizer was found guilty of making illegal payments through subsidiaries “to foreign officials in Bulgaria, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Italy, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Serbia to obtain regulatory approvals, sales, and increased prescriptions for its products” (“SEC Charges Pfizer…”, 2012, p.1). Not only were they making these payments secretly, but they were obtaining business without letting competitors know, which is a monopoly being formed through information asymmetry. There is also the case of Alliance One and Universal Corporation, where they were found guilty of making secret payments as well to Thailand to illegally get tobacco sales (“Sec Charges Two Global Tabaco Companies…”, 2010, p.1). This is a case where negative externalities are causing a monopoly. The introduction of monopolies through information asymmetry or negative externalities cause market failure for the Unites States, because it is hurting society and competitors are unaware of other firm’s doings when making their decisions. The FCPA wanted to correct all the wrongdoing and restore
It may be unfair for a company not to have fair game or competition for the products that it produces. John D. Rockefeller from the Standard Oil company had raised the prices for oil too high. The standard oil's monopoly effected other American businesses both in productivity and financially. Rockefeller
One of the well-known federal fraud and abuse statutes in the United States is the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which greatly influences business relationships in the pharmaceutical, healthcare and medical device sectors. This statute is an Anti-Corruption law, which is designed to protect beneficiaries of the federal health care program from money influence on various referral decisions. Thus, this law helps in guarding against an increase in costs, overutilization and poor quality services. However, this law needs some modifications to become more efficient to all the U.S citizens. The lawmakers in the country should take the initiative of amending this bill so as to ensure that they adequately represent the interests of those people who
This regulation made business more fair and more morally right for the good of the country and the
The act states that businesses must follow a certain price restriction as well as condition sales on exclusive deals.4 Ida Tarbell raised awareness of the complications with the monopolies and their control over the American people and helped institute the new act that regulates these
Innocent citizen have been placed in jail for no absolute reason. Everyone should have a fair treatment in court. I ask the United States Congress to please put an end to this. We should have an individual authority that’s loyal to the law and knows the laws by heart, other than a judge, in the proximity of the court. This way, whenever someone blameless is being accused wrongly in the court, the person can acknowledge it and report the incident.
Even while there might not be as much public eye on corruption as during a time when muckrakers ran rampant attempting to find issues in society, corruption has become a deep rooted problem of the American Identity that is more than likely not going to disappear in the future unless the government focuses on removing the corruption that already exists rather than trying to mitigate losses for the
In reality, corruption is just one of the numerous flaws of the U.S. criminal justice system. Although both countries are thriving in many ways, and they share many similarities, only one has the upper hand in their criminal justice system. The U.S. criminal
In his book, “The Law”, Frederic Bastiat aims to counter the trend in legislation which he identified in France during his life. A legislator himself, Bastiat worried that the scope of the law had expanded far past what was just and thus performed the very acts of greed and plunder which it should aim to prevent. Bastiat based his argument on the idea that the essence of man is found in his personality, liberty, and property. The role of law is to protect these faculties of man, and anything beyond is abuse of power and legal plunder. Bastiat views these elements which comprise man as innate.
The old Sherman Antitrust Act would have its legacy still applied on nowadays economy. First of all, the concepts trust
Monopolies would coordinate with other businesses to set prices and to set policies. One example is the railroad monopoly. Cornelius Vanderbilt controlled several railroad companies and soared into wealth. With a monopoly over the railroads, he was able to cut out the middle man by reducing the power of the individual managers. John D. Rockefeller also controlled a monopoly only his was in oil.
Monopolies in the 1900’s had immense powers in the market, and were able to have complete control because they had such power. A monopoly is the “exclusive control of commodity, market or means of production” where the “power is concentrated in the hands of a select few” (Beattie). While monopolies do get jobs done and inquire a large amount of money, their success it at the expense of the people and the power they have obtained is abused. They started off liked by small businesses because it helped with shipping costs, but eventually monopolies became too powerful. They are more hurtful to the public than helpful, and the benefits they gain from being a monopoly hurts the public, making them a collective dilemma.
In today’s economy, there lies an ambivalent nature towards government interaction with business behavior. The diametrically opposing ideas battle for supremacy in order to distinguish whether to keep the current tort reform policies or abrogate the notion and let the market stabilize the inconsistencies. The primary and most salient argument for reform is that tort laws undermine the essence of businesses. Advocates for business and professionals have insisted that it is a drag on innovation, quality, and competitiveness.
The oligopoly market is set up in a way so that competitors can survive because each is unique and there are so few competitors that they are virtually indispensable even if some ethics atrocity
According to the radical critique of law, how does law discriminate? Along with many other policies, the law also stresses on the discrimination which
Thus allowing democracy to regulate the market through a set framework of legislations such as environmental legislations and working hours legislations. Under that framework, the market is mostly free, allowing private ownership for