ipl-logo

Court Of Final Appeal Essay

944 Words4 Pages

The Court of Final Appeal (CFA) is the highest level of court in where cases would be appealed to in Hong Kong. The main purpose of the CFA is to hear appeals from the Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal. The CFA consist of a Chief Justice, three permanent judges, and one non-permanent judge in the process of hearing. Non-permanent judges are non-permanent Hong Kong judge or a judge appointed as a judge from another common law jurisdiction. Permanent judges and non-permanent judge in the CFA are fully experienced judges. There is theoretically no difference between them because non-permanent judges are also judges.
All judges must be just and impartial. This implies that judges serves the same symbolic value which is justice and impartiality. Therefore, every judge is not excluded from being just in making a decision. It is also not possible to reverse the statement saying that judges do not serve a symbolic value. The fact that judges exist in the legal justice system is to pursue fairness and justice in the community. Hence judges symbolize justice to the society. Furthermore, having more foreign judges in the courts may represent the strong international status in Hong Kong and its judiciary independence.
Non-permanent judges involves …show more content…

Foreign judges are able to bring their expertise and knowledge from another jurisdiction to Hong Kong which enhance the improvement of our legal system. Foreign judges acquire special knowledge from their jurisdiction which could be shared amongst Hong Kong judges allows local judges to obtain different perspectives of viewing a case and at the same time look at cases from other jurisdiction to fulfill the lack of database in our common law system. Therefore, cases and knowledges from Australia, UK, and any other countries devotes to the pool of expertise in the Hong Kong

Show More
Related

  • Common Pleas: Court Case Study

    553 Words  | 3 Pages

    MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Of Clarence Thomas Essay

    591 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hello diary. I address you today with confusion and apprehension, with consternation and disappointment, disappointment in a country that I fear has let me down. I write to you asking for help, guidance, and strength. I write to you regarding the President’s nomination for Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas, hoping the words I write breed clarity and confidence in my future actions. I first heard of Bush’s selection in the paper this morning.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Buffalo Creek Disaster By Gerald M. Stern

    1521 Words  | 7 Pages

    Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

    Read More

  • Evidence That Defendant Is Guilty

    851 Words  | 4 Pages

    The judicial officer is the person wills all the power to decide what happens to the person being accused. They are the ones that the information

    Read More

  • Dual Court System

    635 Words  | 3 Pages

    The District Courts have original jurisdiction and is where most of the violations of federal law as well as civil law are decided. There are 94 district courts divided into 13 circuits in the federal court system to include territorial courts in Guam, Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico. The Circuit Courts of Appeals was created by Congress to lessen the load of the Supreme Court just like the intermediate courts of appeals does for the state supreme court. With only appellate jurisdiction, it only reviews cases for errors in the law. The third component of the federal court system and the highest court in America is the United States Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Juror Eight Argumentative Essay

    372 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The boy is five feet eight inches tall. His father was six feet two inches tall. That’s a difference of six inches. It’s a very awkward thing to stab down into the chest of someone who’s half a foot taller than you are. ”-(Juror two, 54)

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Essay

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    “There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.

    Read More

  • Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

    492 Words  | 2 Pages

    The district courts of appeal are similar to the U.S. Courts of Appeals and hear appeals from the circuit courts. There are five district courts of appeal in Florida. The court of last resort in Florida is the State Supreme Court (“Florida Courts”,

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

    462 Words  | 2 Pages

    When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    We enjoy our ability to exercise our rights in the voting booth. With that in mind, electing judges serves the will of the people and makes us feel as though we have a measured amount of control over the judicial system. This requires judicial candidates to expose their lives to public scrutiny and represent their voting pool. Conversely, appointed judges would have an easier time concealing truths about themselves that they would prefer the public not see. Favors among close circles of officials are likely easier to be traded in secret.

    Read More

  • The Canadian Judicial System

    1155 Words  | 5 Pages

    Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.

    Read More

  • Disadvantages Of Judicial Precedents

    702 Words  | 3 Pages

    Different judges will have different interpretation of cases; hence, they may bind a single case with various precedents making it more difficult to pass a judgment. In this type of situation even competent judges may find it complicated to decide on the ‘ratio decidendi’. Nevertheless, there are a lot of case laws and deciding which case law best appropriates to a case is not always an easy task, as it is time consuming and very stressful to find the most suitable precedent. Therefore, not only the doctrine of judicial precedent has the disadvantage of being complex, while the judges are discussing which case law to apply to a specific case, justice is at the same time being delayed.

    Read More

  • Role Of Judiciary In Malaysia

    1103 Words  | 5 Pages

    Malaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Acceptance Of International Law

    2404 Words  | 10 Pages

    This view is far from truth in view of the developed and changed character of international law today. It is incorrect to say that international legal system is without a court to decide international disputes. The establishment of the permanent court of international justice has rightly been reckoned as a landmark for the development of international law because though in international legal system was provided with judicial organ to resolve international disputes on the basis of judicial decisions. The greatest proof of its utility and importance is the fact that its successor, the international court of justice is based on the statute of the permanent court of international justice. It is true that the decision of international court of justice is not equivalent to that the municipal courts.

    Read More

  • Syariah Court Essay

    2288 Words  | 10 Pages

    The legal implications and feasibility of integrating the Syariah courts into the federal judicial system through restoration of Article 121 of Federal Constitution Prior to 1988, Article 121(1) of Federal Constitution provided as follows: Subject to Clause (2) the judicial power of the Federation shall be vested in two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction and status, namely— (a) one in the States of Malaya, which shall be known as the High Court in Malaya and shall have its principal registry in Kuala Lumpur; and (b) one in the States of Sabah and Sarawak, which shall be known as the High Court in Borneo and shall have its principal registry at such place in the States of Sabah and Sarawak as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may determine;

    Read More

More about Court Of Final Appeal Essay

Open Document