Reflection-Carnell Zhou The founding fathers were revolutionary and implacable in the sense that they endeavored to achieve one goal: American liberty. Thus, they desired to form a country whereby citizens possessed considerable rights, including a significant influence on the government. From what I have read, the founding fathers’ vision has been holistically achieved; however, a few of the amendments that may have seemed imperative during the time of the founding fathers should be tweaked, due to society’s changes since then. To begin with, I must acknowledge that I praised Benjamin Franklin’s advocacy of free speech. However, such an amendment relies how it is used; for instance, hate speech, the negative aspect of free speech, is used …show more content…
It is also true that one’s right to bear arms is a form of personal liberty. From reading Justin Liu’s essay, it appears that the preeminent reason as to why the Second Amendment was created was to incite a militia in case tyranny arose within the nation. At the time, a tyrannical and authoritarian government may have seemed plausible; nowadays, however, “It is clear today that despotic regimes do not suddenly appear; rather, democratic government is derived from the people. A tyrannical government could only arise in the USA with a majority of the population supporting it, a very unlikely phenomenon.” As mentioned in the letter, the futility of militias are on full display such as in Yemen, the second highest armed country that is currently facing a conflict between Western dictatorship and jihadist groups. After a bit of research, I have found out that America is the highest armed country, estimating at 89 guns per 100 people. Nevertheless, unlike Yemen’s issue, America is not liable to experience a dictatorship; as previously mentioned, this would only happen if the majority of the people supported it, a quite unlikely possibility. Although the Second Amendment endows upon the citizens a sense of personal safety, it is blatant that this amendment, as practical as it may seem, causes more harm than good in today’s society. In fact, I …show more content…
By reading Kevin Lim’s essay on immigration and the pursuit of happiness, it seems that the immigration policies implemented at the time were heavily affected by the unusual relationship between the British and the Americans after the American revolution. Moreover, it appears that despite Alex Hamilton’s background as an immigrant as well as an immigration advocate, Hamilton’s personal setbacks caused him to criticize immigration in the US. Although Hamilton’s intent at the time was to protect the Americans from outside forces, the reason as to why immigration is important applies to both then and now; immigrants benefit the economy and facilitate new relationships between countries. A prime example of this topic is the Syrian crisis. Currently, the US’s contribution to the Syrian refugee crisis is quite measly and stagnant, lagging behind in its admittance of refugees compared to other countries. Furthermore, with the upcoming US elections, two extremely distinct views on America’s immigration policies have emerged. Amidst this chaos, it is important to note America refusing to accept the refugees is exactly what ISIS desires, for without the refugees there is no taxation and extortion to fund the terrorist groups. Ergo, I respect America’s wish to protect its people; however, with such arduous and
Click here to unlock this and over one million essays
Show MoreName: ZhenLiang Sun Course: HIST 2010 Professor: Dr. Troy D. Smith Date: 06/14/2017 Book Review: The Founding Fathers Reconsidered Richard Bernstein’s The Founding Fathers Reconsidered (2009) presents a new look at a foundation topic in American history. There are two main perspectives utilized throughout the book: the first is an ideological perspective which places the history of ideas in a more prominent position than the history of individual people or individual events. The second perspective is the realist perspective which seeks to reduce much of the myth that surrounds important historical figures such as George Washington or Thomas Jefferson.
Introduction The stories of the founding of the United States is legendary in many regards. History places it that America was found by a group of farmers who had local political experience. This group came together in one accord and in arms to go against the monarch and tyrant to become a self-governed state. In the words of these men, “all men are created equal,” a phrase that natural elicited men and women to risk their lives for freedom .
The author, Ellis, is a dedicated professor and historian focused on those who founded the United States of America. Ellis’ purpose for writing is to explore the different founding fathers and their interactions with each other and examine how these
The 2nd amendment is “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to
Pathos and Ethos Ever since the terror attack that occurred on September 11, 2001, United States of America put a major stop on these refugees flying from their home countries and taking refuge in the United States. United States, ever since the incident that struck our American hearts with sadness then turned into anger, the distraught Americans declared “war on terror”. This war made any refugee coming from these wars torn countries to apply to be able to come into the country and made the process lengthy to get pass the Homeland Security. Donald Trump, our president, a successful businessman, and television personality, has come out as an advocate of rejecting all these refugees until the “war on terror” is over. This reform, proposed by
One hundred years after the Constitution was ratified, a political party emerged that threatened to destroy it: the Progressive party. The Progressive party was built upon the idea that the American government is not doing anything to help the country move forward. They believe that there must be moving forward for the “…uplift and betterment of mankind…”(PR pg. 319). They believe that the government of the founding fathers is not keeping up with the rapid changes in society and that it must adapt to the new challenges (PR pg. 333). Although both the progressive party and the founding fathers declare that they want to guard against tyranny and uphold the good of the people, they have different approaches to the issue.
Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Us americans don't need to “bear arms.” Some may say that many people use them to hunt but there are many other weapons you can use to hunt with as well as protecting yourself from danger. By having the second amendment, it gives criminals the right to go out and harm people, whether it be a family member, friend, someone you walk past. Statistics say that “The U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands.
The Constitution—the foundation of the American government—has been quintessential for the lives of the American people for over 200 years. Without this document America today would not have basic human rights, such as those stated in the Bill of Rights, which includes freedom of speech and religion. To some, the Constitution was an embodiment of the American Revolution, yet others believe that it was a betrayal of the Revolution. I personally believe that the Constitution did betray the Revolution because it did not live up to the ideals of the Revolution, and the views of the Anti-Federalists most closely embodied the “Spirit of ‘76.” During the midst of the American Revolution, authors and politicians of important documents, pamphlets, and slogans spread the basis for Revolutionary ideals and defined what is known as the “Spirit of ‘76”.
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
Debates about the Second Amendment have focused on its parameter to protect private rights of individual people to possess firearms, and the ability to be apart of militia organizations. The world has seen a drastic change since the implementation of the amendment in 1791. Civilian ran militias are almost obsolete, and most militias are now ran and regulated by state governments. The military of the United states has also seen a dramatic increase, and is undoubtedly more powerful. For the most part, civilians are no longer expected or desire to be apart of a militia, however firearms are still essential for self defence, hunting, and
The founding fathers believed that the government’s purpose was to secure the unalienable rights of American citizens to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness by protecting them against violations by foreign enemies. Although, the progressives believed that the purpose of the government was to give people the benefit of the programs the government have, while making the people more socially responsible. The Founding Fathers believed it was for the greater good of everyone to be free and do things on their own. They thought that if people had less rules and were able to do whatever they want there would be and inequality of the wealthiness.
The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep