Definition of Management:
According to Fayol management is “Planning, organizaing, commanding, controlling and co-ordination.”
According to Dale, Management means “ Organizing, staffing, directing innovation and representing.”
Types of Management Styles:
There are many different styles of management when it comes to managing in the workplace and making the right choice of the type of style to lead which can have a big impact in terms of how the staff can produce for you. There are three or more different leadership styles in management, but knowing them does not mean that anyone is going to work. In many cases, the staff that the person is managing will have traits that will help to define which management style to should use, sometimes resulting
…show more content…
They may dislike not being able to contribute their ideas, which can result in a lack of creative solutions to problems, which can ultimately harm the group performance.
1. Lack of involvement from the employee in the decision making process leads to employees not assuming ownership of their work, contributing to low morale, lack of commitment, and manifesting in high turnover, absenteeism, and work stoppage.
2. The heavily centralized command of autocratic leadership style ensures that the system depends entirely on the leader. If the leader is strong, capable, competent, and just, the organization functions smoothly, and if the leader is weak, incompetent, or has low ethical and moral standards, the entire organization suffers for the sake of a single leader.
3. All power vested with the leader leads to risk of leaders with low moral fiber exploiting employees, indulging in favoritism and discrimination, and the
…show more content…
The team also may ask questions and wait for manager’s answers before moving to the next step. This could mean less time for the managers to concentrate on their work.
Characteristics
Following are the characteristics of democratic leadership style:
(i) Cooperative Relations:
The chief characteristic of this style is the existence of cooperative relations among the managers and the employees. Participation in the management decisions gives the employees a feeling of self-respect, as a result of which the employees are always ready to be cooperative in every way.
(ii) Belief in Employees:
The managers inherently believe that the employees by nature want to work, do their work with interest, accept their responsibility and try to perform their work in a good manner. This faith of the managers in the employees increases their morale.
(iii) Open Communication:
This style encourages open communication among the managers and the employees. Open communication means both ways communication, meaning thereby that apart from saying their own thoughts the managers receive the suggestions of the employees with
Week Nine Initial Discussion Post NURS6053, N-20 Throughout my working career as a registered nurse (RN) I have experienced various types of leaders. The purpose of this discussion is to talk about a particular manager and their leadership style.
A good leader should ensure he is trustworthy, direct, and rational, while a bad leader is egotistical, dishonest, and secretive. “The problem with leadership is inevitably: who are we following? You need to be very careful who you select as your hero. " Jordan Peterson.
These styles were a relation between a manager 's concern for people, concern for production and his motivation. The motivation dimension really provides the underlying motive of the leader behind a successful leadership
One leadership style I have obsesrved of both a project manager and superintendent is to lead by example. Both the project manager and superintendent play major roles in a project, and starting a project with a motivated, positive attitude can set the tone for the project environment. When these two roles show positive qualities, others involved in the project will as well. Another management style that I have observed of a project manager is having an “open door” policy by always welcoming questions from other project team members. There are several strengths and weaknesses associated with each of the above mentioned leadership and management styles.
The organizational factors include: flexibility, responsibility, standards, rewards, clarity, and commitment. The research shows that the coercive and pacesetting styles have a negative correlations on organizational climate while the other four styles have a positive impact. Thus, except for unusual circumstances where coercive and pacesetting styles might be appropriate, leaders should normally use a combination of the authoritative, affiliative, democratic and coaching styles to achieve success. The best leaders will sense from their emotional intelligence when to use each of these styles. If you are an aspiring leader or a leader who wants to get to the next level of leadership excellence, Goleman’s article is a great primer on how to effectively use different leadership
Finally, having good relationship with the employees it motivates them to perform their duties in good heart. Understanding their grievances and addressing their problems improves their morale at work and hence they work whole heartedly to deliver good performances. Therefore, the relationship between the managers and employees contributes to a great impact to adhere to code of
2.2 Different types of leadership styles Leadership plays a vital role in order for an organization to succeed, by effectively managing and controlling employees the type of leadership style. The most universal leadership styles concern transactional, transformational, laissez-faire, democratic and authoritative. These styles are widely applied in different organizations
Therefore, management is important and very much needed. The Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez management style are all different and all effective depending on the situation. If one style or approach is not successful when resolving and issue, another style is available to eliminate a hostile situation from
Some of the main approaches to convey different leadership styles throughout the years have been The
“Good units walk a thin line between indiscipline and ineffectiveness. Ignore the rules too often and you’ve got a mob, but enforce the rules too strictly and you’ve got a herd.” by Henry V. O’Neil represents the notion behind an effective organizational behavior. In an organizational settings, how well the employees are managed and understood depends on the leadership style exhibited by the leaders. Finding the right balance between being too strict or too easy with the employees not only create an ideal work environment but also increase productivity and reduce employee turnover.
Thus make being an ethical leader slightly harder than a normal ethical person. So, we must take a deep interest in this topic. Having to know the traits that describe ethical or unethical leadership will make us more careful in acting as a leader, or choosing someone as a leader. Of course we don’t want an unethical leadership or being an unethical leadership. Because the effects or consequences is not only on us, but to others, especially those who work under the
Mosadeghard (2003) had pointed out different styles of leadership. These styles are: autocratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire, charismatic, democratic, participative, situational, transactional, and transformational leadership. Aioanei (2006) explained that in autocratic leadership style, organization is highly centralized. Leaders are more concerned with the tasks to be performed rather than developing relations. In this type of leadership employees are less involved and most of the decisions are made by the management.
Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.
There are many different type of Leadership styles. Different types of leadership styles exist in work environments. ● Laissez-Faire- A laissez-faire leader does not give direct supervision of employees and does not provide regular feedback to those under his supervision.
If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be