Fourth Geneva Convention

1854 Words8 Pages
VI- The Fourth Convention and Human Rights Law:
It should to be focused on the international humanitarian law in wartime which coexists with human rights law, certain procurements of which can't be derogated from.
Securing the individual versus the enemy (instead of protecting the individual versus his own authorities) is one of the features of the law of Armed Forces. A state at war can’t make use of the conflict as an excuse for ignoring the requirements of that law, which is by definition valid to unexpected situations.
International humanitarian law gives due concern to military objectives and tries to accommodate military need with the requests of humanity. Throughout centuries, this law has been progressively changed to take account
…show more content…
After all, all these States seek to adopt the terms of the 1st Article of the Fourth Convention - “to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention “.
However, the following fact cannot be ignored or underestimated - that the States party to the Geneva Conventions hardly ever bear their duty when it comes to clarifying a situation and recognizing the validity of international humanitarian law. The International Court of Justice, the United Nations Security Council and the UN General Assembly have occasionally made statements on these subjects, but not in a regular manner.
Problems of implementing the Fourth Geneva Convention - Case Study
The problems of implementation of the Fourth Geneva Convention are mostly pragmatic ones such as the trouble of battling in populated zones and controlling the conduct of the military personnel performing on the battleground. Yet, the most serious issue is political will. if a nation needs to uphold the Geneva Conventions, it can make impressive efforts to act inside the spirit of them. If a national government has inadequate appreciation for the mankind they attempt to support, and if not, it considers them to be a burden.
This is an active case that we have been witnessing since
…show more content…
If every article becomes clear, the applicability will never be questioned or argued upon. The Geneva Conventions have stated that fighter who do not abide by the rules of war will not be protected by the treaty but in fact they would be subjected to prosecution or further trials under the conditions of the Criminal Law but it would be better if it also states the actual requirements of war, punishments (according to the type of the criminal), detailed rules of law projecting a clear image about the military personnel and they rights of protection and duties, terrorists, and the provisions of a nuclear

More about Fourth Geneva Convention

Open Document