Frances Hector Vs. Cedars-Sinai Hospital: Case Study

331 Words2 Pages
The case involves Frances Hector versus Cedars-Sinai Hospital. Hector had a defective pacemaker implanted at the hospital. Hector then attempted to sue Cedars-Sinai claiming that they were primarily involved in selling the pacemaker and providing the services of implanting the device was secondary. The question is who won? What about the policy that supports the mixed sale doctrine? The answer is that Cedars-Sinai won the case. The Court of Appeals ruled that Cedars-Sinai did not decide which brand and type of pacemaker to select, the physician made the selection. The hospital was also not involved in testing the pacemaker since they did not make the decision. The hospital’s major function was to provide the medical services necessary for
Show More
Related

  • Professionalism In Ethics

    2149 Words  | 9 Pages

    It’s the high level precision and sophistication. The critique of Rebecca Chew in Dr Lim vs SMC case transparency in pricing should lessen legal intervention since patients choose over charging doctors fully aware and intentionally when cheaper alternatives being available. (SMJ,V 56(7)2015). Distributive justice and fairness also has to be looked into, in relation to this case only few got the benefits not the majority. How do you measure happiness, it varies with person circumstance action culture

    Read More

More about Frances Hector Vs. Cedars-Sinai Hospital: Case Study

Open Document