ipl-logo

Frank Sinatra Jr. A Case Of Kidnapping Case Summary

1383 Words6 Pages

The Kidnapping of Frank Sinatra Jr.: A Case Analysis Report Chrystal Vazquez Garcia School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University CRJ260: Introduction to Substantive Criminal Law Professor William Jesse Weins April 23, 2023 Introduction The Kidnapping of Frank Sinatra Jr. occurred on December 8, 1963, in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, and crossed state lines into Los Angeles, California. The three accomplices, Barry Keenan, Joe Amsler, and John Irwin were all captured a few days after receiving their ransom of $240,000 and letting Frank Sinatra Jr. go. This case showcases a lot of important concepts regarding criminal law such as the scopes/sources of criminal law, the elements regarding the crime of kidnapping, the …show more content…

The original defense put forth was that the entire kidnapping of Frank Sinatra Jr. was nothing but a “hoax, a publicity stunt coordinated with people tied to the family” (Kranc, 2021). While the defense was dismissed and the defendants received a life imprisonment sentence, what happened after sentencing is a rare occurrence. Firstly, it needs to be established that Barry Keenan was a successful young man who suffered a car accident, causing him to become addicted to muscle relaxers and tranquilizers; subsequently, his addiction drove him to bankruptcy (Kranc, 2021). This chain of events is essentially what led him to create the plan to kidnap Frank Sinatra Jr. Now, there are two types of defenses to criminal liability: justifications and excuses. The defense of insanity, which is an excuse defense, is applicable in this case. Insanity is defined as “the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and/or will to control actions” (Samaha, 2016, p. 209). Because Keenan and Amler were receiving life imprisonment, they “qualified… for psychiatric observation” (Kranc, 2021). In an interview with Gilstrap (1998), Barry Keenan states that they determined him to be “legally and mentally insane at the time of the kidnapping.” This determination of legal insanity is done by evaluating the defendant’s actions based on the jurisdiction’s insanity test. There are “four tests [that] determine whether people with mental diseases are excused from criminal liability” (Samaha, 2016, p. 212). In 1963 in the state of California, the insanity test that was used to determine Keenan as legally and mentally insane was the M’Naughten Rule. The M’Naughten rule states that a defendant must suffer a defect reason due to a disease of the mind as well as showing that

Show More
Related

  • Examples Of Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity

    641 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) is a form of insanity defense that allows for an individual to not be found guilty of a crime due to a mental defect or disease that results in a lack of mens rea, or the capability to intentionally commit a crime. However, simply having a mental illness or defect does not guarantee that an offender will be found NGRI. Not only would a defendant have to have a major or severe mental illness or disease, but the defendant would have to prove that their condition impaired them so greatly as to not have any control over their behavior or any concept that they had done anything wrong at the time of the offense. Although Bob undoubtedly had a diminished capacity for logic and reason in this case, the example as given does not provide enough detail to determine the nature of Bob’s personality or his potential motives in committing this crime. Nevertheless, there is one major flaw to Bob’s insanity defense: he tried to hide the crime.

    Read More

  • Abdul Lindbergh Ransom Notes

    787 Words  | 4 Pages

    Overview: On March 1, 1932, the son of the famous aviator and Anne Morrow Lindbergh was kidnapped from their home. After searching the home, police found a $50,000 ransom note. After trying to negotiate with the kidnappers, on March 6, 1932, another ransom note, this one for $70,000, was found. The third ransom note was received by Colonel Lindbergh’s attorney on March 8, informing that an intermediary appointed by the Lindberghs would not be accepted and requesting a note in a newspaper.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Clark V. Arizona, 548 US

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Under Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-502, does Aaron Wilson, 1) suffer from a mental disease or defect at the time of the incident, and 2) know right from wrong at the time of the incident; and will therefore be found guilty except insane? A.R.S § 13-502 states “a person may be found guilty except insane if at the time of the commission of the criminal act, the person was afflicted with a mental disorder or defect of such severity that the person did not know the criminal act was wrong.” Ariz. Rev. Stat.

    Read More

  • Arthur Shawcross Reports

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    After he wrote his confession the police had to read 80 pages. At trial the defense tried for an insanity plea. They used his wartime, upbringing, a cyst on the brain, and a rare birth defect. The plan fell apart due to poor execution. It is believed that the birth defect and psychological factors were too difficult for the jury to understand.

    Read More

  • Trial Of The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping

    938 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping On March 1, 1932, twenty-month-old baby Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr was kidnapped from his nursery on the second floor of Lindbergh’s house in Hopewell, New Jersey. Baby Charlie was the son of Charles Lindbergh, a famous aviator, and Anne Morrow Lindbergh in which was “America’s Family”. When the child’s nurse, Betty Gow, went to check on Charlie around 10:00pm, he was gone but Lindbergh nor his wife had the child. An immense investigation was led by the New Jersey State police along with the New York City Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Read More

  • Lieutenant Manion's Defense In Anatomy Of A Murder

    559 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the movie, Anatomy of A Murder, Lieutenant Manion kills the owner of an Inn who allegedly beat and raped his wife. Manion claimed that he did not remember doing it and that he “must have been mad” when he committed the crime. Upon seeing an Army psychiatrist, Lieutenant Manion, and his attorney, Paul Biegler, entered a plea of not guilty by reason of irresistible impulse. However, this plea was not easy for Biegler to prove and was not a defense that was commonly used or even heard of. Manion was assessed by the Army psychiatrist who concluded that the Lieutenant was temporarily insane at the time of the murder.

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates Murder Case Essay

    1867 Words  | 8 Pages

    Prosecutor Park Dietz had claimed in his testimony that Andrea had gotten her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order, in which a woman drowned her own children but got away with it through the insanity defense. The producers of the television show later came forward and stated that no such episode existed, Dietz simply melded together parts of separate programs. The Texas Court of Appeals decided that was reason enough for a retrial, considering the jury’s difficult primary decision could have been biased by false information. So, on June 26, 2006, five years after her sentencing to life in prison, Andrea’s retrial began. The prime reason why it is so difficult to declare someone not guilty by reason of insanity in Texas is the M’Naghten Rule.

    Read More

  • The Insane: The Case Of Andrea Yates

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Doing this, in her mind, was the only way she could protect her children. In her first trial, she was found guilty and was sentenced to life in prison. She found herself being allowed to have a second trial, and after deliberating her mental state at the time of the crime, the court had found her “not guilty by reason of insanity.” She would find herself being committed to a psychiatric facility to be treated, rather than being sent to jail for life. This is where the guilty of insanity plea gets tricky.

    Read More

  • What Is Myers III V. State Of Indiana An Example Of Mental Competency?

    1528 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the field of criminal law there is a certain type of criminal defense that comes to the court and has a low success rate. These cases concern the mental capacity of the defendant and if they have enough mental capacity, or are sane enough, to be aware of their crime and consequences of crime. The insanity defense is extremely rare because of how difficult it is for the defense to prove to the court and jury that the defendant did not have the mental capacity to understand what they did wrong and the consequences from it. The case of Myers III v. State of Indiana is one example of criminal responsibility and mental capacity. This case has information that can be connected to the textbook with the insanity defense tests, mental competence

    Read More

  • The Insanity Verdict On Trial By Scott O. Lilienfeld

    1669 Words  | 7 Pages

    Unlike serial killers with psychopathy they manipulate the system to benefit their own means to an end. Allowing this disorder to fall into the insanity defense would feed into their disorder in that it would allow for the manipulation of the system to

    Read More

  • Insanity Defense Reform

    92 Words  | 1 Pages

    In refers to class discussion, as a result of the M’Nagthen case, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 (IDRA) is only use when the defendant does not understand the nature of the crime committed. Therefore, although neurosis or personality disorders qualify as a mental disease according to the DSM-5; the law has eliminated these types of disorders from being utilized in courts as a form of defense. The law has also excluded the irresistible impulse or inabilities to comply with the rules as a means of defense in the federal

    Read More

  • The Case Of Andrea Yates

    1523 Words  | 7 Pages

    “It was discovered that one psychiatrist, Park Dietz, had given testimony that turned out to be untrue. He had claimed that Yates got her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order. It turned out that he had confused the plots of multiple episodes” (Andrea Yates, 2021). It was during this trial that Andrea Yates was found not guilty by the reason of insanity and was sent to a maximum-security state mental facility. The M'Naghten Rule, which states “all defendants are presumed to be sane unless they can prove that–at the time of committing the criminal act–the defendant’s state of mind caused them to (1) not know what they were doing when they committed said act, or (2) that they knew what they were doing, but did not know that it was wrong”

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates Case Essay

    2011 Words  | 9 Pages

    For Dena Schlosser, the issue of insanity was less clear. In Schlosser’s first trial, the jury ended up deadlocked as to whether or not Schlosser was legally insane under the Texas insanity defense law. Similarly, in the second trial, the defense and prosecution let the judge decide the verdict, which was not guilty by reason of insanity, and it was revealed that Schlosser had a brain tumor, which could have led to her religious delusions telling her to cut off her baby’s arms, fatally injuring the daughter (New York Times). In the simpler case of Deanna Laney, Laney suffered religious delusions that led her to crush her sons’ skull with rocks, and the expert witness, Park Dietz, said, “Laney didn’t realize her actions were wrong, which means she was legally insane under Texas Law” (NBC). All five psychiatric experts in the trial said Laney qualified as insane under the Texas due to a “severe mental illness [that] caused Laney to have psychotic delusions that rendered her incapable of knowing right from wrong during the killings” (USA TODAY).

    Read More

  • Use Of The Insanity Plea By Andrea Yates

    2597 Words  | 11 Pages

    During my true crime podcast era, I came across Andrea Yates. Yates was a mother who killed her five young children by drowning them in a bathtub. While listening to this case, it was revealed that the insanity plea, or also known as the insanity defense, was used. It got me thinking about how the plea works and how people would allow this outcome over a jail sentence. The insanity plea is a tough topic to tackle in the world of criminal law.

    Read More

  • The Theme Of Death In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood

    1445 Words  | 6 Pages

    The court dismisses the plea quickly because “the justice system ignores psychosocial complexities and histories in favor of black and white definitions of right and wrong” (Myers). The justice system in this time very rarely accepted pleas of insanity or mental illness. Capote wrote that “after an hour’s conversation with the defendants, the doctor rule[d] out that neither man

    Read More

More about Frank Sinatra Jr. A Case Of Kidnapping Case Summary

Open Document