The idea of a unified society, living peacefully with all the differences in the world stemmed from Kwame Appiah’s book Cosmopolitanism (2006). Thus, the idea of cosmopolitanism is that everyone is a “citizen of the world” (Appiah 14). Which means, no matter the cultural differences everyone is to live within the same standards and guidelines. When evaluating the plausibility of a cosmopolitan society, one should think of the coexistence of different cultures and ways of living. In considering this idea, there is a mass amount of culture clashes, or culture wars, throughout history. However, there are is an extreme amount in historical societies. Furthermore, the issues are found in both different cultures and in different moral codes, or moral …show more content…
With that said, human beings, even though generalizing, do not possess the ability to put others ahead of themselves because of simple human identities. Thus, the idea would mean that they put their values, beliefs, etc. ahead of any other persons. For example, a topic that one is uber passionate about is at significant risk of being completely disregarded as it would focus on differing opinions. A fictional example comes from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (2011). Victor Frankenstein’s main goal in creating the monster was to be one of the “benefactors of our species” (37) even though “M. Krempe was not equally docile…[and] almost insupportable sensitiveness” (44). When Dr. Frankenstein’s professor and friend told him that his actions were absurd and completely unsupportable, Dr. Frankenstein still created his creature of fortune. Also, Victor Frankenstein is compulsive with creating the monster that he eventually shut himself out from his friends, family, and even fiancé. In Victor Frankenstein’s aim at being the “benefactor of our species” (37), after the monster was created he came to the abrupt and urgent conclusion that “It was dreary…I here he held…the accomplishment of my toils” (35) and realized that he had a major fault in his actions. Also, once Victor Frankenstein created the monster, he realized that he made a mistake in not listening to his professor, M. Krempe. …show more content…
A teacher of cosmopolitanism might embrace the ideology in order “to see to the inner disposition if…[their] soul and the deeds of love…[they] could do to others” (Kittelson 77). With this mindset, the differences in the world are what make that individual themselves. Preceding with this ideology, the person would have to be humble enough to be able to understand the differences in other cultures and to accept them. In taking the idea even further, the individuals need to be able to effectively communicate throughout the cultures that they are looking at. Thus, the ideology would need to have significant prerequisites in order to live up to the philosophy. Inconclusively, the ideology would need an individual of significant restraint and love for the world. Some of these individuals have existed throughout history, in reference to Gandhi, King, and Buda to name a few. However, these types of individuals are one of the few throughout history to live a cosmopolianistic life, which is the act of living one’s life by the guidelines of cosmopolitanism. Withal, the thought of these individuals who are seemingly a result of the butterfly effect, which is a theory that all events are related. Because there has been cosmopolianistic individuals within recorded history, the possibility for cosmopolitanism to be prevalent within society is possible, yet the percentage
The author of “The Literary Panorama, and National Register, N.S., 8 (1 June 1818): 411-414.” uses the critical analysis to point out the flaws of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein story. Although there have been many re-printings of Frankenstein, Mary Shelley originally wrote and published her book Frankenstein in 1818. When Frankenstein was first published in 1818 it was met with mixed reviews like any good book is. I found my critical analysis on the website Romantic circles run by the University of Maryland under the The Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley Chronology & Resource Site by Shanon Lawson.
Victor Frankenstein, is at fault for the creature’s actions. Victor was looking for some honor and triumph, but when he accomplished his experiment, not only did it bring terror to Victor, but to the whole world. The monster never learned right from wrong and was never raised correctly, his first moment of life, all he experienced was the fear in Victor's emotion, and was abandoned right from the start. Victor selfishly isolated himself from society and ran away from his responsibilities which caused destruction to the people Victor cared for and loved deeply. The creature was known as a monster and was doomed due to his appearance.
Frankenstein created the creature so he could manipulate the power of life, not to learn from the experience. He is so immersed in his studies, fascinated by the creation of life. He studies what the human body is made up of and how it falls apart. Victor completely disengages from the world when away at school after his mother dies of scarlet fever.
Frankenstein did not take into account the feelings of the creature. Frankenstein wanted to be the first to create the life, but did not think ahead. His initial ambition is to help the people, and perhaps his creation will benefit the humankind, however, he lets his ambition take over, and does not think of what the creature will act like or do. He creates the creature but only to suffer and in return he suffers as well. Frankenstein’s actions to not take care of the creature causes the death of those around him.
After successfully creating the monster, Frankenstein is perplexed by what he has created. Due to the monster’s annoyance with Frankenstein, he acts back against Frankenstein mostly due to his lack of parenting and responsibility. Shelley’s novel strongly connects with the act of parenting. It is clear that Victor Frankenstein did not complete his role as a parent. Due to this, it further led the monster to misbehave and feel as if he does not have a purpose in life.
The differences in customs, religion, and basic moral and human ideology prevented the Native American and European cultures from sharing the common bond of human fellowship to serve as the basis and foundation for the growth and betterment of human civilization. Unfortunately, this is a trait seen by the human species that have led to the collective downfall of civilizations throughout time, and will repeat itself until the human perspective of its remarkably fortunate place in the universe is dramatically
D’you know that? I thought I was making something better than human! Something so precious and beautiful that everyone would love it.” This shows that Frankenstein had good intentions when making the Monster but did not conduct his experiment properly and should be responsible for his experiments which caused the Monster to be isolated and become evil.
But these are not thoughts befitting me; I will endeavour to resign myself cheerfully to death, and will indulge a hope of meeting you in another world”(24). Victor shows the strong love of family in his childhood “No human being could have passed a happier childhood than [me]. My parents were possessed by the very spirit of kindness and indulgence” (Shelley,40), he raised with excellent conditions and with parents who loved their children, but we do not see that Victor gives this love to his creature and ignored him, notwithstanding the fact that the two figures shared many characteristics. As a result of Frankenstein 's darkness and ignorance toward his creature, he refused to accept the monster because of his physical appearance and Frankenstein sees the creature as if he were the monster when the creature
The monster continues by reassuring the creator of his independent intelligence and power over the creature by telling Frankenstein, “This you alone can do”. Here, the creature assumes a role of submissiveness and reliance on Frankenstein. Frankenstein’s monster gains the sympathy of the reader who, despite condemning the murder of innocent people, commiserate with the lonely creature who is in search of an acquaintance, which he will likely never find. The monster also displays power and aggressiveness over Frankenstein; “You are my creator; but I am your master; obey!” The monster wants to desolate Victor’s heart, not by killing him directly,
(October 22, 2001). The Clash of Ignorance. The Nation, Vol 273, No 12, p.2. begins with the presumption of the unique relevance of a singular classification (11). Indeed, the question “Do civilizations clash?” is founded on the presumption that humanity can be pre-eminently classified into distinct and discrete civilizations, and that the relations between different human beings can somehow be seen, without serious loss of understanding, in terms of relations between different civilizations(12).
Victor Frankenstein turns away from his responsibilities by ignoring the existence of his creation. Throughout the novel, Victor is constantly running away from the monster and not giving him attention, which resulted in the monsters change of personalities. For example, in page 71 the creation said, “All men hate the wretched; how must I be hated, who am miserable beyond all living things! Yet you, my creator, detest and spurn me, thy creature, to whom thou art bound by ties only dissoluble by the annihilation of one of us.” This quote suggests that because of the ignorance of Victor the monster began to become evil and have the urge to seek
Frankenstein Literary Criticism Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, is filled with motifs of Nature and companionship. During the Romantic period or movement, when the novel Frankenstein was written, nature was a huge part of romanticism. Nature was perceived as pure, peaceful, and almost motherly. As we read the novel through Victor Frankenstein 's perspective, we the readers can see how romanticized-nature is perceived as by those who find comfort in nature. This novel also contains, in addition to romantic elements, heavy-filled gothic scenes and descriptions.
Frankenstein: Does this Story Reflect Modern Society? This book is just that. A story. There has been no indication that an “inanimate” object can be given the power of human life.
Giuseppe Mazzini and Mikhail Bakunin were born in the 19th century, 1805 and 1814 respectively. Mazzini, a politician, and Mikhail Bakunin, a philosopher, had different ideas, but they both seemed to agree with their different arguments, that cosmopolitanism, even though its arguments were ideal, they wouldn’t be able to put in practice in reality. The term cosmopolitanism comes from two different Greek words, kosmos which means “world” and polis, “city”. Thus, a cosmopolitan is a “citizen of the world”.
Cosmopolitanism provides another view to draw on based analytical, normative and experiential possibilities. According to Beck and Sznaider, cosmopolitanism begins with the self. This view questions the self of the European humanism (Schiller et al. 2011). The existence of humanism relates to epistemology, ontology, methodology, emotion and