In the Gothic Novel, Frankenstein, by Mary W. Shelley, the moral conscience of the two main characters, Victor Frankenstein and the Creature is a prominent theme throughout the novel. The novel explores the consequences of reckless ambition and the responsibilities that come with creating life. Victor's ambition and the subsequent abandonment of his creation lead to devastating outcomes, while the Creature's yearning for acceptance and love exposes the dark side of human nature. Through the contrasting experiences of Victor and the Creature, Mary Shelley highlights the importance of moral conscience and the consequences of failing to exercise it. Both Victor and the Creature exhibit moral conscience by acknowledging the ungodly actions they do throughout the novel.
Victor displays moral conscience when the creature kills William and Justine is convicted of killing William. Victor is tortured by the knowledge that the creature killed his family. He understands that his scientific “curiosity and lawless devices would cause the death” (Shelley 49) of two of his most cherished family members. Victor realizes that creating the creature has only caused destruction and despondency. Although the monster has killed William, Justine is blamed for the murder. Frankenstein
…show more content…
He tells Frankenstein that he killed William because of how his creator treated him. He explains to Victor “I am malicious because I am miserable” because of how I look (96). He is murderous because Frankenstein made him an ugly beast hated by mankind. The creature describes his appearance and soul as devilish. He relates himself to the serpent in Genesis saying “[he] ought to be thy Adam; but am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed” (61). The creature intended to be good, but he let his desire for vengeance corrupt his soul. He understands his actions are malicious but does them out of retaliation to
Frankenstein; the creature lashes out on the human species. The creature believes that his creator is at the one to blame for the injustice that he faces because he brought him to life. He says “cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live, did I not extinguish the spark of existence….. My feelings were of rage and revenge” (Shelly, 121) As a result of the way his creator treated him, the monster planned vengeance.
This decision is the first reason Victor should be held responsible for the murders of his family and friends. On page 35, the text says, “I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open; it breathed hard, and a convulsive motion agitated its limbs.” (Shelley) If Victor had not given the creature life, then it would not have been able to murder anyone. He let his ambition impede his common sense.
We believe Frankenstein is not guilty In the whole case, there are around 4 recorded deaths. The servant, Clerval, William, and Elizabeth. All these deaths are due to the Monster, not Frankenstein. This is not Frankenstein's doing as Frankenstein intended for the monster to be a peaceful creature.
I was benevolent and good; misery made me fiend. Make me happy and I shall be virtuous” (90-91) In the novel, the creature was shown being helpful to the De Lacys and the little girl who was seen drowning that he saved. That is ultimately besides the point because his negative actions outweigh his positives through the entirety of his life. Overall, many things can be looked at to shift the moral responsibility but overall, due to the creators actions and his diction, he has a moral culpability over the murders
The creature went on to terrorize Victor’s family and life by killing William and blaming Justine. “Remember that I am thy creature; I ought to be they Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel. Whom thou drive from joy for no misdeed. Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded…” (87) The monster compares himself to devil.
(129-131) Victor admits to himself that he is responsible for Justine’s death, and still holds back information about the true killer, his creature. In doing so, Victor shows his selfishness because he is more worried about the repercussions he would suffer if his creature were discovered than the fact that Justine is innocent, and does not take proper action to acquit Justine. He is the very reason that Justine, William, Henry Clerval, and many others
In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the two main characters, Victor Frankenstein and his creature, both display a sense of moral ambiguity. Each character has committed both good and evil alike, and neither knew the consequences of what they had done. However, Victor Frankenstein is generally the morally ambiguous character by his treatment of his creation and his own imperious personality. He wanted to be able to help science by recreating life or bringing it back, but at the same time, he did not want to consider the consequences of doing so. Victor tries to prove himself as a good moral character in the relationship between his creation and himself.
The novel Frankenstein brings to light many problems and situations that shed light on the faults of mankind. Cruelty was a huge factor in the novel; throughout Frankenstein is cruel to his body and to his creation. When he first makes the creature he runs from it, leaving the creature to fend for himself; even when reuniting with the creature he continues displays cruelty. The creature, in turn exhibits Victor cruelty right back. Within Frankenstein cruelty can be attributed, often affecting both Victor and the creature; serving as a crucial motivator and revealing their anger, pain, frustration till eventually both die.
There are very few people that would question the dark and horrific nature of Mary Shelley’s writing in her novel Frankenstein. However, Mary also manages to connect the reader to the characters through the use of an emotion that is not commonly found in the horror genre. Guilt is one of the major over-arching themes of Frankenstein and can entirely change how a reader may view a given character, and Shelley uses this to show how each character changes over the course of the story. In the novel, nearly every character goes through their own stage of guilt of varying intensities. Elizabeth, Victor, and even the monster feel guilt for their actions or lack thereof.
The gothic fiction novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley centralizes on humanity and the qualifications that make someone human. The content of the novel Frankenstein depicts a monster displaying human traits that his creator Victor does not possess: empathy, a need for companionship, and a will to learn and fit in. Throughout the novel Shelley emphasizes empathy as a critical humanistic trait. The monster displays his ability to empathize with people even though they are strangers. On the other hand Victor, fails to show empathy throughout the novel even when it relates to his own family and friends.
In the novel "Frankenstein" the moral conscience of the main character Victor Frankenstein can be questioned several times. In several instances Victor Frankenstein puts his loved one's lives in danger throughout the entire novel. Also Victor Frankenstein sometimes feels little or no remorse from his actions that harm the people close to him. Victor Frankenstein never fully realizes that all of the horrendous events that happen to him and his loved ones stem from his creation of the monster he made at Ingolstadt. It is Victor Frankenstein's lack of a balanced moral conscience that leads to much of the tragedy in Mary Shelley's novel, "Frankenstein".
Nonetheless, William is not receptive to his offer of friendship and calls him a “hideous monster” (Shelley, 144). This implies that knowledge and reason cannot negate the monster’s physical appearance, thus rendering him to a life of social isolation. Additionally, although Victor promises to find “a companion of the same species” for his monster, he is unable to (Shelley, 123). This troubles the monster and causes him to exact revenge on Victor by murdering his best friend, Henry Clerval, and his bride.
Duality is shown in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, a gothic tale of a scientist whom looks to advance the life-giving qualities of mother nature. Through this novel, Shelley proves that good and evil in human nature is not always simple to define, and that everyone has both of these qualities within them. The duality of human nature is shown through the characters of Victor Frankenstein and his monster, who are both heroes in the novel while simultaneously displaying anti-hero qualities. Shelley forces the reader to sympathize with them both but also creates gruesome ideas of the two. Frankenstein’s creature places himself in a submissive position when he begs his creator to have mercy on him and asking the creator to “create a female for [him] with whom [he] can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for [his] being.”
“Who did it?” is the question that has stood the test of time, from “Who ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil?” to “Who used the washroom and didn’t flush it?” In the case of Frankenstein versus Monster, it’s clear that the monster was a murderer also known as the one who did it. But is it the monster’s fault that he killed people?
The creature knew about the human laws and was intelligent enough to recognize its crimes as wrongdoings. The creature had choice and still chose to commit crimes rather than leave his creator, who clearly did not want him, alone. Feelings of sympathy or a lack of sympathy for the monster can reveal personal characteristics about the