Job design dates from the 1900’s with Fredrick Taylor who is known as the father of Scientific Management. In 1909, Taylor published "The Principles of Scientific Management." In this, he proposed that by and simplifying jobs, productivity would increase (Grachev and Rakitsky, 2013). Taylor’s theory focused on efficiency, productivity and profitability of the industry; he did not consider the human factor. (Akrani, 2011) assumed that Taylor considered workers as robots, which could speed up the work at any cost and that Taylor assumed that workers are motivated only by financial gains. However, in reality, (Akrani, 2011) related that workers are motivated not by financial incentives but also by social needs and personal egos. Fredrick Hertzberg’s Motivation Hygiene Theory set out to uncover the psychological needs of employees to improve their job satisfaction. (McCubbrey, 2016) expounded that the theory encourages employers to design jobs that improve and motivate employees beyond simply meeting a daily or weekly quota. Also, (McCubbrey, 2016) stated the theory highlights the importance of reward and oversees how and when employees are rewarded. …show more content…
Alderfer ERG Theory posited that individuals become frustrated if they fail to fulfil a need and move on to the other. ERG theory does not rank needs in any particular order and explicitly recognizes that more than one need may operate at a given time (Carpenter et al, 2010). Douglas McClelland 's Acquired Needs Theory is the one that has received the greatest amount of support. McClelland’s Needs Theory emphasized that individuals acquire three types of needs as a result of their life experiences which are need for achievement, need for affiliation, and need for power. Managers and executives usually have a stronger need for achievement than people in other
The American Industrial growth of 1870s-1910s was a result of the hard work of the laborers, but the sharpest minds of the entrepreneurs are who deserve the credit. During this time the emergence of talented and often ruthless entrepreneurs led the abundant raw of supplies and new technology to the industrial revolution. These new factors persuaded many businesses to build their own research and engineers and scientists became increasingly tied up with the research and development of agendas of corporations. As a result, a new principle of scientific management known as "Taylorism" was born.
Despite these initial impressions, the “visitor realized suddenly that he had come to the home of many of the torments of his life” (Sinclair, 1985, 42-43). In contrast to these positive and negative aspects to Taylor’s Scientific Management for the laborer, the managers had their own series of
Employers reorganized management practices by creating an educated management staff is another major point that supports Montgomery’s argument. The evidence that Montgomery uses is from a book called Scientific Management and Labor, written by Robert F. Hoxie, who was a special investigator for the U.S Commission on Industrial Relations and another book by Hugh G.J. Aitken who wrote Taylorism at the Watertown Arsenal: Scientific Management in Action, which explains Taylorism. Montgomery includes these sources to depict how employers used a management system to weaken craftsmen workers since their craft was no longer needed. This reduces the need for craftsman because an employer can train any worker to preform the same task while constantly being watched by managers. Craftsmen had a sense of pride for the particular craft that they had acquired.
These are the factors that play a major role in increasing employee motivation on the job. While management was once determined by status and privilege, this is no longer the case. Modern leadership is now an ambition that leaders must earn from the people following them. Leaders must make a daily effort to keep their followers motivated and committed to the leaders they are following. Followers make a daily decision whether to follow their leaders.
Another difficulty faced with hours and labor was when a man named Frederick Taylor thought of the “Scientific Management Method” which stated that a manager should supervise each section of a job and time how long it would take for each part to be
As the business environment evolves, so does the need for motivating people in order to increase productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness. With this in mind, managers are consistently balancing the company’s requirements with the needs of individuals who support the organization. Clayton Alderfer looks at the Abraham Maslow’s motivational theory and expands the principle. Maslow’s claims that if a person is lacking food or shelter, then they will not care about security. Additionally, he believed that self-actualization needs are not considered unless one external condition promotes healthiness, safety, and emotional stability.
The physiological needs, job safety and security, and the need to belong are not satisfactorily being met (Newstrom, 2007). Should money be the most important factor for motivational behavior; the company needs to understand the needs of their employees. Then, the rationalization of motivation will concur with the beliefs of the employees. The incentive scheme should be re-evaluated to introduce a new program of motivation. The company should implement a goal-setting objective.
Although motivating employees can be a challenge, a number of theories about motivation at work can be used as a basis for creating practices, procedures and processes to affect employee
People tend to work to meet their desires and to improve
According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory, there are five broad motivational needs classified into basic needs and growth needs (Kaur, 2013). The basic needs include, esteem, psychological, love and safety. On the other hand, growth needs involve self-actualization. In this regard, Maslow stipulated that individuals are motivated to attain certain needs (Kaur, 2013). These needs are arranged in such a way that the lower needs must be met before the higher ones.
Taylorism and Fordism were business theories formed by Frederick Taylor and Henry Ford during the early twentieth century respectively. Taylorism, sometimes referred to as scientific management (Ed Clark, 2010), is a “form of job design which stresses short, repetitive work cycles; detailed, prescribed task sequences; a separation of task conception from task execution; and motivation based on economic rewards.” Fordism, a derivative of Taylorism, adopts scientific management principles. It is defined as the “unification of high-volume, high-speed production of a limited range of products using mass production, assembly line technology and unskilled, assembly-line operatives, aimed at a mass consumer market” (Ed Clark, 2010). Both theories
The first one is Maslow’s need theory which is a motivational theory that illustrates the five types of human being needs in hierarchical pyramid structure. The first type of Maslow’s hierarchy is psychological need such as air, food, shelter, water. The second type is safety needs such as security from outside threats and freedom from fear. The third type is belongings need such as friendship, trust and acceptance, receiving and giving affection and love. The forth type is esteem needs such as self-respect and to be respected from others.
Fayol developed the ’14 Principles of Management’ including; Initiative, giving employees the freedom and space to be creative and unique. Espri de Corps; where a business will promote uniqueness and unity within a workforce and Scalar Chain; where employees will always be made aware of their place and role within the business, ( Manktelow 2015). Whereas Taylor called his theory ‘Scientific Management’ and overly stressed the need for efficiency and restricted himself to the activity of production within a firm. It could even be said that Taylor had a micro-approach due to his restrictions within a factory and Fayol had a macro approach as his principles are adaptable to all fields of management. However, Taylor did conduct several experiments earlier on in his studies testing the task sytem within a firm focusing on all aspects of production such as the time needed, materials, labour and what was the quickest, most-effective way of producing the good in question, ( Taylor 1911)
Next, there are four types of important theories of motivation which includes Maslow`s H Hierarchy of Needs Theory, McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y, Herzberg’s Two- Factor Theory and McClelland’s Three-Needs Theory. These theories represent the foundation from which contemporary theories grew and still are used by practising managers to explain employee motivation. Motivation is an internal feeling which can be understood by manager because he is only one always close contact with the employees.” Motivation is
Nowadays, most of the corporations’ top managements and CEOs understand how significant employee motivation is in the workplace as well as in the business environment. AirAsia is one of those successful corporations which focus on its employee motivation and rewarding system by holding onto theories such as the McClelland’s Three-Needs Theory and Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory. McClelland’s Three-Needs Theory proposes that there are three major motives in work which are the needs for achievement, power and affiliation. By practicing this theory, AirAsia would have better guideline and standards in recruiting and promoting its employees.