However, humans’ egoism and selfishness disturb others’ freedom, because they think freedom is something that will solve their life problems and reduce responsibility from them. These circumstances make humankind incapable of using their freedom and create chaos. Thus, persons realize that it is necessary to create something that can control them and prevent chaos. And the example of comparison between authority and freedom is Jesus and The Grand Inquisitor in “The Brothers Karamazov”. On the one hand is Jesus
You should live your life every moment, make mistakes, gain experience, choose and choose again. What will be in the end? The future, where the old Nemo awakens, is perfect, and in fact, stupid world where no one thinks about the consequences. Only the human mortality can create this fascinating tangle of possibilities with a bunch of thread ends. Limitation of man, its finiteness, acts as a misfortune and a gift at the same time.
Devlin would have thought the act of polyandry to be immoral and disintegrates the society however, being a moderate moralism he would not have wanted to intervene with the privacy of other unless the act has become very widely practiced and start causing harm to the society. However, if the was a law to be passed to make polyandry legal, Devlin would have disagree with this because once it has been made legal it will drive and encourage many to conduct this immoral act. Devlin did not say that every immoral act is to be prohibited. Devlin used the jury box morality of average right minded citizens where moral standards of behaviour are the standards of behaviour of a reasonable man. Will a reasonable man think the act of polyandry as something good and to be done?
When authors create a dystopian society, they often try to predict the future and maybe even include a few similarities that relate to present day society. Ray Bradbury created a life in the future similar to today but without the pleasure of having books. Kurt Vonnegut created a world where everyone is equal to no restraint. Finally, Veronica Roth shined light on a future where people must choose their own path where they will be stuck forever. Technology in Fahrenheit 451, government in “2081”, and equality in the novel Four, are all examples of dystopian life the varies from modern day society.
Without the protagonist, the show would never have a chance to go on. Therefore, when Truman had decided to break free and to start his own life, it was his struggle against his despot, Christof. The Truman Show is a non-linear narrative, as it has various flashbacks to different parts of the life of the protagonist. The narration type is a successful choice, as it helps to exaggerate the effect of Truman’s realizing of the artificial nature of the world he has been living
Weir is pointing out how far the media is willing to go to gain an audience. Another perspective is the value of the American dream. As mentioned earlier is Truman living the American dream. Truman has everything the American dream includes but lacks true relationships. Perhaps does the film want to tell the audience that the American dream is worthless without true people to share it with.
And it’s real simple. And I think it’s not that uncommon.” Angelina Jolie defines her idea of freedom as having independence in life without the feeling of being enclosed in a rigid civilization. This quote directs to Jim and Huck’s pursuit of freedom as they begin their journey to escape from social restraints. In the novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn the theme of freedom is presented throughout the story as Jim and Huck overcome hardships along their adventures. Firstly, Jim and Huck have grown up in a society where they were pushed
In the Canarsie Bank Trust Company building, he would create his own self-contained universe. It might not be the best possible future or even a particularly comfortable future, but it was a future that he could see” (287). This thoughtful opinion indicates that Mitchell has gone through a thorough thinking process so he can realize the most critical aspect of life is about survival. All of these new ideas appear after he starts to accept his innate fear and concentrates on thinking about how to achieve the purpose of survival. It is not reliable to say that the new living style is absolutely the correct choice for Mitchell, but at least now he has different options to choose from.
While I would not argue against the notion that there is some transference of real-life schemata to infer meaning for on-screen actions, Bordwell does not address that, even though film try to emulate realism, in the end they will be fiction – even if they are documentaries as well. Films have a constraint in relation to time, they simply cannot emulate the depth of a real person and the spectator can only do so much to fill in the blanks for characters on-screen, to fulfill the depth of a real person. To give credence to this transference of real schemata, we can look at Theory-of-mind (find source!). A key development as a human to fully develop the social understanding of the intentions of others, which is needed in society. It seems logical then, that this understanding is applied to the fictional characters on-screen.
The theorists believe that our human understanding for self-awareness gives us the strength to learn about freedom and as we realize that we are not an unending resource and that we have little time in our hands which ultimately makes you realize that we have choice to either take action or not, and the meaning is not ideal. At that time, we should seek the reality, and accept that we can be lonely, with no meaning and live in guilt and isolation. Thus, people should be allowed to freely choose the alternatives available to them while living their lives and have a larger role to play in shaping their own destinies. The way we live and what has become of us is a results of the choices made and people should accept the responsibility for shaping their lives as per the choices