One of our most precious rights as American Citizens is our Freedom of Speech. Our Constitution was written to protect us from being criminally punished due to beliefs, actions or speech. We were ensured that our right for expression, verbal and non-verbal, would be heard without restriction or limitation. The First Amendment regarding Freedom of Religion, Press, [and] Expression states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievance” (U.S. Const. amend. I). In this paper, I will argue that the ideas of freedom, such …show more content…
During the Pre-Enlightenment, the views of freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of the press shaped the ideas that were part of that era. Without the ideas from thinkers, such as John Locke and Thomas Jefferson, there would be no protection of freedom of expression. While they continually tried to publish their thoughts, they came upon strict censorship, religious and governmental, which made them fight for tolerance, reason, freedom of religious belief and freedom of speech. John Locke was one of the most influential thinkers during the Pre-Enlightenment and his writings catapulted him into notoriety since it touched upon the subject of religious toleration. In his “A Letter Concerning Toleration,” Locke states that “no private person has any right in any manner to prejudice another person in his civil enjoyments because he is of another church or religion. All the rights and franchises that belong to him as a man, or as a denizen, are inviolably to be preserved to him. These are not the business of religion. No violence nor injury is to be offered him, whether he be Christian or Pagan.” Furthermore, no “civil rights [are] to be either changed or violated upon account of religion.” Therefore, Locke argued that religion is not a reason to reject someone’s rights. It is a person’s right to have an opinion, religious or otherwise and as such, government cannot censor these opinions through punishment, therefore freedom of speech is a protected civil
Religious liberty should be able for everyone and every religion should be able to impose their values on people who want to listen. No one should be able to control a delicate subject such as religion. Many people are with religious liberty such as Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan gave a speech on Religious Liberty in which he stated, “when you stand up for your values, when you assert your civil rights to vote and to participate fully in government, your defending our true heritage of religious liberty”, which shows how he encourages his people to stand up and assert your civil right on religious freedom. Ronald Reagan’s view on religious liberty is that it should be liberated for every religion to impose their beliefs and values on people who are willing to listen to them and that people have to stand up and fight for religious liberty because if not who will.
That this unalienable right (religion) is formed by personal opinions and evidence created in an individuals’ mind. He continues on with saying how religion is an obligation given to every man to respectfully pay homage to his creator, and man cannot be a member of civil society without it, but if the General Authority imposes his religious beliefs in civil society he shall live in a state of reservation. Additionally, Madison recognizes that even if this Bill were the want of the majority, that it would crush the want of the minority. He also strongly believed in the legislative’s body removal from all religious mandates, claiming that to have a free government you must preserve the separation of power and each branch must never cross the line which over step’s the individual rights of the people and that previous rulers that have
amend. IX). This amendment displays the idea that the readers of the constitution should not assume that the rights clearly protected within it are the extent of all human rights. This amendment fights for the idea that everyone deserves their natural human rights, even if they are not explicitly given in the constitution. Locke and Rousseau both have opinions on this topic of natural rights shown in their respective texts, and it can be argued that the ninth amendment was influenced by both contributors, however Locke would have much less conflicted opinions on the amendment than
One of the biggest influences that John Locke had on President Jefferson was, what John Locke dubbed, “Natural Rights,” and what Jefferson called, “Unalienable Rights.” Meaning practically the same thing, these rights were very similar, and it is obvious that Jefferson’s version derives from Locke’s ‘Natural Rights.’ John Locke’s version stated that all peoples shall possess the following rights: Life, Liberty, and Property. In this case, life means, that people people will fight to live and want to survive. Liberty refers to being free, and being able to make one’s own decision.
"The first amendment, which gives people the freedom of religion, press, and speech, is something taken for granted by Americans. Throughout history, free speech has been both limited and stretched by the government. The first amendment, which gives people the freedom of religion, press, and speech, is something taken for granted by Americans. Thus, the government should have the ability to monitor and control the government, but only to the extent of protecting the country against potential threats.
For example Locke, argued that people should be allowed to choose their own government, as it will have a greater chance of not failing. Locke said, “The people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative,... for the society can never,... lose the native and original right it has to preserve itself, which can only be a done by a settled legislative and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it” (Document A). John is stating that it shouldn't be the government who makes all the decisions but the people as it is their right to do so. John Locke was just one of the four figures in the enlightenment that made an impact.
Thomas Jefferson was clearly familiar with Locke’s work when drafting the Declaration of Independence where he stated that Americans had the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The Enlightenment influenced colonists to think rationally about their government, realize what was lacking, and work to change it. John Locke also stated that citizens had the obligation to revolt if their government did not protect their rights. Enlightenment ideas did not result in any real change in the years before the Seven Years War but they were consumed and discussed by colonists who would use them in the years to
John Locke thought, “They [people] had natural rights,” (The Modern World, p. 55) which these rights were given to everyone at the time that they were born. One example of this is that Antigone says “It is no shame to pay respect to our own flesh and blood.” (Antigone, p.20) She is willing to take any punishment, even death, because she knows she is doing the right
To begin with, the first amendment is very important to the Constitution and our daily life. In the first amendment there are five freedoms given to American citizens, the freedom of religion (from religion too), press, speech (expression), assembly, and the right to petition against the government. According to the article “First Amendment” on kidlaws.com, the freedom of religion,
Based on the first amendment which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”. We the citizens of the United States have the freedom to choose and practice our religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press and freedom of petition. Although this amendment seems to be beneficial for the general public it actually does more harm than good. I do not believe that there is in fact a such thing as freedom. Freedom means the power to act, speak or think as one warns without hindrance or restraint.
Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech”. Some people in today’s time would argue the first amendment is one of the most important listed in the Bill of Rights. Many forms of speech are protected by the first amendment that one wouldn’t think would be such as flag burning and “adult videos”. Over the years there have been many different court cases that have debated and fought the forms of speech that are protected. Many people in society treat speech differently and this is given in the United States because there are such diverse groups throughout the nation.
No idea is more fundamental to Americans ' sense of ourselves as individuals and as a nation than freedom. The central term in our political vocabulary, freedom—or liberty, with which it is almost always used interchangeably—is deeply embedded in the record of our history and the language of everyday life. Before the readings and lectures in this module, I believed the major issues at stake regarding the understandings of American citizenship in the late 1800’s, had much to do with the written laws of the Federal and state government. Based from my previous knowledge, of the Women Suffrage Movement, to the freedom fighters, political and social figurative leaders, to lastly to civil rights, and citizenship, I my assumption of that, was based on written laws that white supremacists, and authoritative figures including the government followed, regardless of their feelings towards justice and equality.
At the core of the First Amendment, a promise is made by The Constitution of the United States, stating “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Cornell University Law School, 2015). It is a promise made to all citizens that they will be given the right to practice their beliefs and join together in protest or peacefully assemble. This ability for everyone on the nation - even the minorities - to make themselves heard is an essential part of a functioning democracy (American Civil Liberties Union, 2015). Time and
As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.