ipl-logo

Freedom Of Speech In Universities Essay

1380 Words6 Pages

There are many ways to speak in public. Not only speaking in public, but also in writing, presenting, protesting, and texting. The languages you use towards one another are a way to communicate. Freedom of Speech had been established in the year of 1791. What is freedom of speech? Freedom of Speech is having the right to express your own opinions without being controlled. In that case, article “Hate Speech” by lakoff and “The Betrayal Of Liberty On America’s Campuses” by Kor’s article had some similarities and differences. Both articles titled are different but the meaning of the articles share the same topic. In “The Betrayal Of Liberty On America’s Campuses” is about how speech codes affect the life of college students. “Hate speech” is mainly talking about the First …show more content…

Speech codes shouldn’t even exist. People should have the right to speak however they want to. Even if there are going to be some cruel words but it’s better than going for a physical harm. “Hate speech” article is discussing about the First Amendment, language, and speech. “Hate speech” could relate to anybody perspective. In “The betrayal of liberty on America’s campuses” by Kors and “Hate speech” by Lakoff both have similarities and differences. The similarities between these two articles is that they both discuss a topic about freedom of speech. For example, the articles mentioned about speech codes in campuses. The differences in these articles is that Kors articles focus on more about freedom of speech. In Kors article it talks about how students can’t speak up for themselves because speech codes in all campuses was in the way. It has many controversial statement in Kors article. For Lakoff articles there wasn’t any controversial statement. There was opinions about language and her ideas about it. Her article focuses on more about hate speech like how we clarify language. How it could affect the people perspective in a way. Those are the similarities and differences about these

Show More
Related

  • Should This Student Have Been Expelled Summary

    215 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the story “Should This Student Have Been Expelled?” by Nat Hentoff was a very good argumentative passage. Hentoff argues that freedom of speech should be valued no matter how offensive it is interpreted by others. Dough Hann abused his freedom of speech when he blurted out “Fuck you niggers” to black students at Brown University. A student asked Hann to stop screaming and Hann yelled “What are you a faggot?” Next, Hann noticed an Israeli flag in the student’s dorm and asked “What are you a Jew?” and shouted, “Fucking Jew!”

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass's Role In Social Media

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hate speech is defined as: speech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. While the United States has the bill of rights and the freedom of expression/speech some states do have speech provisions such as California. There are laws that label speech as ‘limited classes’ which could cause one to be sued in a court of law and that would include: lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or “fighting” words – those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. All other speech is protected under your first amendment rights. Refer to a legal expert when in

    Read More

  • Should The First Amendment Be Considered Hateful?

    107 Words  | 1 Pages

    In my interpretation of the First Amendment, the rights of the people to freely express their opinions, even if unpopular, is clearly protected. Specifically, hate speech is not clearly defined and may differ between people. Individuals and groups can disagree on if specific issues may be considered hateful. Advocates of, what some may consider as hate speech, will likely disagree that their opinions on an issue would be considered hate speech. Protecting all speech, including hate speech, should only imply that the government is following the first amendment to not interfere or be prejudice against anyone expressing their opinions if done so with regard to other laws.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

    1204 Words  | 5 Pages

    The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

    Read More

  • Charles Lawrence Racist Speech Summary

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    Borders of the First Amendment are at the center of the legal debates about free speech and hate speech. While free speech is considered to be a basic right, as the Supreme Court has given the right to free speech. However, when such "free speech" crosses the line and becomes a threat, the courts have stepped in and punished the speaker. First Amendment does not protect free speech that has the intention of doing harm or damage.

    Read More

  • Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    If someone is going to have a conversation with another person, than their freedom of speech should be protected, however; if someone had the sole intentions of causing harm or discomfort to the person that they were speaking with or at, then their freedom of speech may not be so protected. This should be of no concern to any persons on a college campus who are worrying about their right to freedom of speech or expression being neglected, considering that speech codes only work to prevent harm inflicted by hate speech to all students. I agree with Lawrence in that if we are going to end racism, we, as a society, have to take small steps in protecting minority

    Read More

  • Robin Lakoff Hate Speech Analysis

    151 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hate speech destroys the First Amendment because it doesn't allow a person to express their free speech. According to Lakoff, people who don’t experience hate speech, don't think

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Fighting Words

    680 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the sidewalks of Rochester in the year 1942, Walter Chaplinsky was arrested for repeating ' You are a God damned racketeer' and 'a damned Fascist’ to a police officer. Chaplinsky’s statements violated a New Hampshire law prohibiting offensive, derisive, or annoying words or sounds said unto an individual or party in a public place. He appealed the decision of the District Court, and when it came to the Supreme Court, they came to a profound decision. Supreme Court Justice Murphy said there are certain words that could reasonably result in a fight or a breach of peace when uttered.

    Read More

  • Should Hate Speech And Should It Be Protected Under The First Amendment?

    285 Words  | 2 Pages

    Is hate speech free speech and should it be protected under the First Amendment? Hate speech is speech that is used to verbally assault a single individual or a group of people based on their race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, or gender. While some countries such as France, Canada, Chile, Germany, etc. have passed laws in an attempt to combat or minimize hate speech, the United States guarantees full protection of hate speech under the First Amendment. The First Amendment, which was ratified in 1789 and adopted in 1791, essentially forbids Congress to create any laws curtailing the freedom of speech, freedom of press, or the right of citizens to peaceably assemble and seek assistance from the Government for a redress of grievances. Since the adoption of the First Amendment, Americans have consciously, continuously, and contentedly exercised their right.

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech In College Essay

    905 Words  | 4 Pages

    Free speech and hate speech can be classified as different topics and when arguing for one, we can also criticize the other. Free expression and free speech on campuses are crucial for sparking important conversations about equality and social justice, and the suspension of free speech and expression may have dire consequences on college campuses. First, freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views, while also allowing students with common beliefs to align. Free speech and the call for free speech allows those who have been historically systematically oppressed to use their voice.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    Freedom of Speech Freedom of speech is the freedom all people have, to express what they consider and express any opinions. It is an ability to express our opinions freely without being punished or censored. All people throughout the world are entitled and must have right to freedom of speech. However, how much do we know about freedom of speech: when did it occur? Does every countries have it?

    Read More

  • Essay On Freedom Of Speech In Malaysia

    965 Words  | 4 Pages

    Malaysian has the right to freedom of speech which is guaranteed by Article 10 of the Constitution of Malaysia. The Article 10 allows all citizens the absolute freedom as not restricted by the government. In Malaysia, Law such as Publications act and printing presses give the Malaysian authorities the control over all the media. Any act that against this law may lead to fines or in much extreme cases, prison sentence. Although Malaysia has the right to freedom of speech, the media are still being controlled by the government which restrict them to publish anything against the government.

    Read More

  • Should Universities And Colleges Should Be Free To Attend Essay

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    Universities and Colleges Should Be Free to Attend These days, receiving a post-secondary education depends on the numbers in your bank account rather than the numbers on your report card. Universities and colleges should be free to attend because everyone should have an equal chance to learn and the amount of debt they have after finishing university or college is significantly high. The equality of learning at a post-secondary school is non-existent. Everyone should have an equal chance to learn at the level they deserve, no matter how much money they have. Studies show, “Among those not attending their first choice college, sixty-two percent said they could not afford to attend it and twenty-five said their first choice school didn’t not provide them with any financial aid” (Lucie Lapovsky).

    Read More

  • Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Malaysia

    1026 Words  | 5 Pages

    As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

    Read More

  • University Education Should Be Free Essay

    1676 Words  | 7 Pages

    In recent years, the number of people who have been attending university greatly increased, consequently, arguments have continued as to whether students should pay for this prerogative or not. With no doubts, everything has its two sides and the problem of whether the university fees should be paid by taxpayers or not is not an exception. Still, there are people who believe that authorities should take the responsibility for funding the university fees. However, others disagree and opine that it is solely the responsibility of students to pay for their higher education that is in a direct connection to their prospering future career and life in general. In this way, it is important to review both sides of this controversial question.

    Read More

More about Freedom Of Speech In Universities Essay

Open Document