From a person cheering for their nation's team in sport games to a devoted soldier fighting in some war for their country, nationalism is something exhibited everywhere in people's daily lives. Nationalistic feelings can determine loyalty as well as collective and personal identity, and have the power to evoke powerful responses. Some oppose the whole concept, claiming it is responsible for genocide, human rights violations and other global armed conflicts today. Another argument is that some of the world's concerns, such as poverty and environmental issues, can only be resolved through cooperative internationalism. Others, however, point out the beneficial role of nationalism in forming nation-states, like France and America, and development …show more content…
Social factors are something that have influence on individual’s lifestyle, objectives, beliefs, and interaction with other people. Radical social reforms which took place during the French Revolution created the sense of collective consciousness and feelings of nationalism for the nation. France used to be an absolute monarchy and a feudal society that greatly favoured the aristocracy and the Roman Catholic Church. The king expected his people to be loyal to them, rather than to themselves, as a nation. One of the factors that sparked the revolution is the “Ancien Regime”, the division of the French society imposing inequality upon its citizens. The bottom Third Estate suffered from heavy tax burden, unemployment, scarcity of food, lack of rights and political power. They united with the shared connection of despising the monarchy, and the First and Second Estate for their exalted privileges, and strongly desired equality. The bourgeoisie especially, were voicing the demand of change, as they were educated and had higher literacy among them. Also, majority of them were merchants, providing them the opportunities to get informations concerning other countries. For example, the traders heard about how in Britain the authority of the monarch had been overthrown and limited. These bourgeoisie came back to France and shared this insight with the civic, changing their …show more content…
It was the social elements that were the underlying stimulus to all the reforms, revolutions and wars, molding the base for nationalist feelings of French individuals today. Commonly, the relationships among people in a society are identified as the social factors. These may include whether someone should be considered important or not, who should be leading, and those that must be included or excluded. Also very significantly, social influences control how groups should resolve conflicts and overcome challenges. Through French Revolution, the whole social structure of France was altered. Before, citizens were merely subjects to the monarchy, and bound by distinctions in classes since birth. After the revolution and creation of democratic government, French people had greater rights, freedom and voices, as pursued with their slogan of “liberty, equality fraternity”. They were able to look for themselves and their goals as a nation, now that the power was dispersed and not solely in the hands of the king and the Catholic Church. The rights of the citizens and constitutions that expressed the French people’s new ruling principles were clearly drew out. Citizens seeked out their legislative bodies and national government for guidance, no longer to a king or the nobility. All of these things developed common identity for the people, who
Now each estate is taxed equally, and everyman no matter what their social class is, has equal rights. “Changing Relationship B/W King and People Source C: Declaration of the Rights of man.” After the Fall of the Bastille, chaos broke out, and the National Assembly reacted by abolishing the feudal system and all of the laws and customs that went
The French Revolution is an uprising in France against the monarchy from 1789 to 1799 which resulted in the establishment of France as a republic. An example of the French Revolution is the storming of the Bastille by the French citizens. It caused havoc in France for many years. The government separated the classes by money and state of living. According to Travels in France by Arthur Young, the peasants were mistreated badly.
The third estate, which makes up 98% of the population, is unhappy with the dramatic advantages that the first 2 estates receive. Getting rid of nobility helps all citizens have equal opportunity. Doc B “Jan 21,1793 Trial, conviction, and execution of Louis XVI for treason“. The execution of King Louis not only served as a symbol, but also showed that the French population want a honest leader in a democratic nation. “ February 1794, All slavery abolished in French colonies.”
The stasis within the social classes after the revolution was beneficial to society. “One class did not overthrow another; the poor did not supplant the rich. But social relationships-- the way people were connected to one another-- were changed, and decisively so” (Wood 132). There was a solid relationship between higher and lower classes, and that helped maintain balance within communities, which made the new country a “giant, almost continent wide republic of nearly ten million egalitarian-minded bustling citizens who not only had thrust themselves into the vanguard of history but had fundamentally altered their society and their social relationships” (132-133).
Due to their education, the working class understood how vastly dissimilar their standard of life was to the nobility and the clergy. The bourgeoisie were educated and had the means to obtain literature from around the world. They, thus, knew what the standard of life should be, how the upper estates were living, and what their life was actually like. This caused an immense amount of resentment (Document 4). The American Revolution also greatly influenced the French rebels.
As the French had about Twenty-five million people, 100,000 were clergy, 400,000 were the nobleman, and the rest was known as the third estate. The third estate was left to starve, while Louis XVi and Marie Antoinette lived a luxury lifestyle. The only food they could afford for a limited time was bread, but then the prices got so high, that the rich can only afford it.
This open thinking allowed great women like -- to support their family without a man and by their own wits . The seigniorial system was a key factor in forming New France 's society as well. The system did create a sense of community through, everyone once again being connected to a higher power, the seigneur. The one year gap of communication between France and New France allowed this seigniorial system and new politics to flourish . The system also formed a large hole in the community for it promoted self sufficiency through
The main difference between the American and French Revoultion was that one successfully converted to a democratic government and one did not. The French Revolution was not successful in forming a democratic government due to France’s history of a monarchy, economic issues and divison among its’ people. Unlike America, France had a long history of sole rulers and dictatorship which made the change to a democratic government much more difficult and ultimately impossible. America’s motto of “all men are created equal” (Doc A) was the complete opposite of France’s dividing estate class system. The third estate consisted of peasents, common people and the bourgeoisie, the second estate belonged to the Nobles, and the first was the home to the Clergy.
The actions taken against the oppression of the monarchy demonstrate that the French Revolution challenged the traditional value of social inequality to a near-full
Compare and contrast of The French Revolution and The American Revolution The American revolution and the French Revolution are two major incidents happened in the 1700s, which had intense social impacts on both French and American societies. In general, the American Revolution was more successful than the French revolution. The similarity between them is that the citizens in both countries, both faced the block of common economical development of the government. However, there is a difference that makes the American revolution succeeded while the French revolution doesn’t.
Opening paragraph The French Revolution was a major failure and a minor success. After all of the blood shed, the laws, civil rights, and codes did not get instituted effectively and did not represent the values that the citizens had fought for. Examples of this were the Napoleonic Code and Declaration of Rights of Man. Another reason it was a failure was because during the revolts and reforms more than 40,000 men and women died.
This paper examines both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and James Madison remark concerning ‘ factions ’ as the potential destructive social force to the society. To layout and examine, this paper will first outline and discuss on Rousseau’s understanding of factions in The Social Contract,and Madison’s discussion on factionalism in the Federalist Papers 10.But there are many component surrounded with their view’s on ‘factions’,so it is important to consider together. Firstly,I will consider the definition and the element surrounded with their view on factions. With regard to Jean-Jacques Rousseau in The Social Contract,he believes that the society can only function to the extent that people have interest in common.
A key political theorist influencing the initial outbreak of the French Revolution is Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The Social Contract, written by Rousseau, provided the rights the French people initially demanded. In the Social Contract, Rousseau delegitimizes absolute monarchies and popularizes rights of
Impacts of Socio-Economic Factors What are socio-economic factors? According to Chase (n.d.) “Socioeconomic factors are the social and economic experiences and realities that help mold one 's personality, attitudes, and lifestyle.” The environment in which we live can shape a child’s growth.
In order to support these claims, I will discuss the characterisitcs of social moblity, while providing the necessary examples. Social Mobility On the topic of social classes, the question of social progression ought to rise: is it possible for people to move within a society 's stratification organization? In other words, is there some possibility of social mobility, or the improvement from one social level to another?