Ego Ego is a holy word for Equality 7-2521 tHe main character in Anthem by Ayn Rand. The definition of ego is a person’s self-esteem or self-importance. Where Equality 7-2521 grew up men were taught that the word “ego” was a synonym for evil and selflessness, but Equality didn’t believe that. Being an egoist can be both good and bad, Equality was someone who held his truth above everything else in the world, so would he be considered an egoist?
That since human corrupted values is a product of society, we need to critic society and its institutions and strive towards the conceptual idea of a “natural” society. John Locke another influential political philosopher, also argues that “beliefs, like other human differences, [are] largely the product of environment” and thus the fault of human irrationality is to be blamed on society. This theoretical reasoning is based upon the huge assumption that Man is naturally morally good. Blaise Pascal another major influence to Mainstream enlightenment reasoning, published his influential book Pensées posthumously in 1670, in which he tries to objectively convince that its better to believe that God exists, for you will be faithful and rewarded by God in the case he does exist. That if you don’t believe in God in the scenario he does exist, you shall receive divine punishment.
Andrew Carnegie was one of the wealthiest men at the time, and had nothing in common with Jane Addams. Carnegie believed in survival of the fittest. He thought that only the well equipped and worthy should be successful, as seen in his famous quote, “And while the law of competition may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race because it ensures the survival of the fittest in every department ”. Jane Addams on the other hand believed that unless everyone prospered together, no one could prosper. Her famous quote, “The good we secure for ourselves is precarious and uncertain until it is secured for all of us and incorporated into our common life”, shows her belief that success must be achieved by everyone working together.
People became inherently self-interested because there were those who were considered the “fittest” (those were the people on the top), which were contrasted with those who were “unfit” (these people were those who had to work to be at the top). As for the redefinition of competition, this was defined as those who compete would reach the top. This time period was proven to be more cut throat in the way that you had to be inherently selfish to be at the top and competition was a major key factor in becoming part of the “fittest” class. Another ideal that prevailed was the idea that inequality is natural but equality is not. This meant that the world is purely a “dog eat dog” world, and there is no cooperation.
Altruism is assuming the duty to promote someone else’s welfare at the expense of one’s own interests. Charles Darwin, an evolutionary scientist stated that altruism which he called sympathy or benevolence is an essential part of the social instinct because helping and cooperation have promoted the survival of species. But this paper is not about scientists’ outlook on altruism; it is to understand Nietzsche’s way of taking it. The moral view of altruism is that an action is morally right if it promotes the interests of the others. For Nietzsche, it is a moral principle that involves self – sacrifice.
Traditionalists also argue that college sports are designed to foster true sportsmanship and not so the athletes could profit from them,” (NYB.org). Again, it shows that even the NCAA believes that college athletes should not be paid, and that being paid takes away from the true aspect of being an outstanding athlete and being shown off on a national level. Football may be one of the biggest money makers for colleges, but never does one turn a sport that started off so simple, as young men showing their skills and creating friendly competition, to a rigorous business that the only reason somebody would like to join the team is for the money you receive in return for your talents. This concept confuses many old athletes like Nick Saban, “When you invest your time, you make a goal and a decision of something that you want to accomplish. Whether it 's make good grades in school, be a good
KANT’S ETHICAL THEORY Introduction Immanuel Kant(1724-1804) was German philospher who was the opponent of utilitarianism and supported the Deontological Theory. Kant believed that certain types of actions were absolutely prohibited, even in cases where the action would bring about more happiness than the alternative. For Kantians, there are two questions that we must ask ourselves whenever we decide to act: (i) Can I rationally will that everyone act as I propose to act? If the answer is no, then we must not perform the action. (ii) (ii) Does my action respect the goals of human beings rather than merely using them for my own purposes?
Even though people didn’t think death as an valuable nor important thing, they thought death through obtaining glory is valuable. As stating “Win glory before death” with confident tone, it showed that winning the glory means to become successful which later lead to the death. Without gaining the glory may define as the failure according to the flow of the phrases. To gain the glory, people are acting violently and selfish before the time of death comes. This phrase arouse the sympathy of the people living in this time as competing until the
He says such to motivate people to work for what they want. An athlete, in this case, will not reach the top of the podium just wishing for wins. They have to work for it. Words can only do so much. Lead by action.
Persuasive Argument National Athletes are/are not Paid Too Much The topic, pro athletes are/are not getting paid too much, is a heated argument between people. Have you ever thought about it? Well, an answer that I’m sure would be agreed with is that national athletes are paid way too much money. Some people might say that they deserve what they get, but there really isn’t any supportive reasons for that.
Getting Paid to Play a Sport in College? College athletes have been playing inter-collegiate sports without pay since 1852 there is no reason to change that now. College athletes should not get paid because the previous college athletes did not get paid, the grind without pay makes you a better person and teaches you not to take anything for granted, and teaches you not to expect an award for everything good you do in life. College athletes should not get paid based on the simple fact that it would be detrimental to college athletics and why they are played.
Because money corrupts, student-athletes shouldn 't expect it or want it and should simply play their game out of love...whilst providing entertainment to the masses and technically earning millions of dollars for TV networks, colleges and the NCAA. While one could argue overly the ludicrous and truly unethical contradictions of the argument "play for free, play for purity," that would dignify the belief that student pensions are the only answer to the current system; which is not true. There are countless flaws with the current system and just as many solutions, only one of which involves universities handing out a biweekly check to their
They only see the side they choose to; it is making them stronger, faster, and more energetic. But society cares because steroid use is a form of cheating. (Walker). Also, for athletes that do not use drugs to “gain”, they get offensive that others cheat to be better than all other athletes that are good and fair to the game. Cheating occurs often with athletes, especially men, and the cheating and disloyalty needs to stop.
Immanuel Kant, 1724-1804, was a German philosopher who is considered to be a central figure in modern philosophy. Throughout his career Kant argued that the human mind creates the structure of human experience, that reasoning is the source of morality, that aesthetics arises from a faculty of disinterested judgment, that space and time are forms of our sensibility, and that the world as it is "in-itself" is independent of our concepts of it. However, Kant is most noticed for his platform of alternative ethical approach known as duty. Also regarded as deontological ethics or deontology, it is the ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on rules, which is thought to be where the title of duty comes from. According to the theories placed by Kant, the rightness or wrongness of an action does not depend on their consequences, but rather if they maintain the ability to fulfil our duty.
C. S. Lewis presents remarkable ways that different topics and arguments can coincide with each other and make complete connections with the purpose of his book Mere Christianity. After reading Mere Christianity it became apparent that his use of rhetorical devices is unlike any other. He has the ability to portray his arguments in a way that his readers could understand. This quality is quite impressive and every writer, who is trying to persuade, can definitely look upon his work to see a glimpse of what great persuasive piece of writing looks like. SUMMARY