For example, in the cartoon is state “no, he didn’t this fight, called “the battle of Black Jack, is consider by some historians the first battle of the civil war. This demonstrate that the decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case affected Kansas, which was becoming a tuning place of battles and fights between pro-slavery and anti-slavery people. In conclusion, Kansas, after the declaring the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, became a place of tension and conflict between people from Kansas who were against of slavery, and people from others states that were in favor of slavery and wanted slavery in order to increase their wealth as it was demonstrated in the cartoon “Bleeding Kansas”. Finally, the Dred Scott Decision was of great importance to the United States because it let to the end of slavery in the United
The North wanted the new states to be free, while the South wanted the new states to be slave states. Slavery was a huge topic that was talked about before territories became states and the west expanded. #9 How does the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the use of popular sovereignty lead to the violence that becomes known as “bleeding
The Missouri Compromise was only able to increase the brewing conflict of slavery between northern states and southern states. By registering Missouri as a slave state and drawing the line where slavery allowed in the the United States, the fire of war was kindled. The Missouri Compromise began
The Civil War occurred because the North and the South had opposing viewpoints over the topic of slavery, resulting in sectionalism and/or violence, as shown by the secession of the Southern states, consequences of the Kansas Nebraska Act, and the reactions after the Fugitive Slave Law was passed. Before the Civil War, the nation was divided between two powerful regions, the North and South. The North and the South disagreed about many issues involving state rights, tariffs, and most importantly, the issue of slavery, which was legal in the South, but not the North. As the United States gained new territory, huge debates erupted over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the area. Southerners feared that
The reason why the Civil War started was because there was a lot of contention between the states expansion of properties. The South wished to take slavery into the western territories, while the North was committed to stopping the expansion of slavery. The expansion westward was due to the explosion of cotton textiles,
The conflict over slavery became more brutal as the United States expanded westward. It began to force Americans to either identify themselves as anti-slavery or pro-slavery. The discovery of new states led to the conflict on whether they should be admitted as free states or slaves states. Compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were attempted to settle the conflict of free states or slave states. The Missouri Compromise declared that all new states above the line would be establish as free states, and all states below the line would be establish as slave states.
This event did not go over well because it showed the north in an aggressive manner about being anti-slavery which caused more tension over slavery. Another key event that took place leading up to the Civil War was the Wilmot Proviso, which was a law that was created by David Wilmot of Pennsylvania. That had called for a ban on slavery in any lands won from the Mexican War. However it ended up not passing in Congress but this event heated up the debate over slavery in the new territories. Since the tensions were already high over slavery this event only sparked the war to occur even more.
Lastly, the legislation declared that fugitive slaves "escaping into any state or territory of the United States may be lawfully reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service", and that even if in the free territories, "slavery and involuntary slavery in the punishment of crimes" was permitted. While the compromise seemed to address the issue, it only went on to slowdown the war that was soon to come. Although the agreement incorporated in the Missouri Compromise maintained the balance of slave and non-slave states in the territories added to the Union in The Louisiana Purchase, the issue over slavery's expansion into new territories arose again following the Mexican War. The question of whether new territories
The expansion throughout the continent would only serve to reopen the controversy over slavery and create further tension between the North and South. As long as there was a fundamental difference in beliefs throughout the country, conflict would continue. The possible acquisition of land from Mexico led to another point of contention in the slavery debate. When a bill surfaced to appropriate funding to purchase peace with Mexico during the war, a provision was added to prohibit slavery in any newly acquired territory. Southern opposition soon surfaced claiming that all Americans had equal rights in new lands.
This reorganization of the government also includes the rise of new political parties (LEP). The 1850s crisis only expanded the amount of pressure. Bills like, the Kansas-Nebraska that allowed settlers of that territory vote whether or not they would allow slavery in the state, pitted Northerners against the Southerners. Additionally, events like the “Bleeding Kansas”, the caning of Charles Sumner by Preston Brooks, the Pottawatomie Massacre, the Lecompton Constitution, Dred Scott Decision, and the Harper 's Ferry Attacks, led to major conflicts against the two parties (LEP). This government disorder played a significant role in leading America into Civil
Slavery ended in the late 1800s and it was a major controversy to the Northern States. The Northern states were anti-slavery while the Southern states were pro-slavery. Since they were two different opinions because the northern states did not accept or want slavery to keep happening it ended All this slavery controversy and war could have been avoided by simply making slavery legal in all states, replacing the president, and machines being created faster than they were. Also, there were ways they could settle these opinions, and one way is they could have made slavery legal which all the people would have come together and unite as one. As one they would have fought all together a different way to end this, instead of just those who were
With the war favoring America, David Wilmot, a Democratic Representative from Pennsylvania, proposed the prohibition of slavery across all the newly acquired lands. While the Wilmot Proviso was a failure, it did set up a foundation for the Free Soil Party (1848- 1854). The emergence of the Free Soil Party was a strong indicator that the Mexican American war had a profound effect on the slavery issue. The Free Soilers, spearheaded by radical abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass and moderates like David Wilmot represented the unity of the abolitionists fighting against the expansion of slavery. In the period prior to the war, the abolitionists were divided in different camps.
Missouri wanted to enter the nation as a slave state which would cause a problem, the North was concerned by the unbalance that it would cause within the Senate. So congressman James Tallmadge "proposed a ban on the importation of slaves into Missouri and the slow freedom of its black residents". As a way to make the North happy, the House of Representatives passed the bill that granted Maine as a free state. In addition, as part of the compromise, slavery would be not allowed slavery in the north of the 36°30 ' parallel line. The issue over the Missouri Compromise caused controversy within Congress.
But the South still didn’t have enough to keep slaves from absconding. In 1850, the South pushed through Congress an even harsher and more punitive law, which was more invasive of the rights claimed by free states. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 specifically required all marshals and deputy marshals to carry out its provisions. These provisions included to arrest and keep safe fugitives and to assist slave holders in returning their slaves. The provisions also included a command to citizens to aid and assist in the execution of the law, and it ordered local courts to issue to slaveholders certificates empowering them to use force and restraint to remove and return their fugitives.
Slavery was an extremely prominent and debated issue in the late 1800’s that ended up dividing the United States in half. There were the Northerners who opposed the institution of slavery and the Southerners who gave it their support. The controversy over the use of slavery had been an issue between the North and South for a long time but it became even more evident during the election of 1860. Abraham Lincoln ran in the Republican Party a group who had devoted itself to keeping slavery out of the new territories as the country expanded westward. The south feared abolitionists would use violence in order to deprive the south of slave property.