Armed Force Training Essay

Constraints and Contradictions in Training for a Full-Spectrum of Operations

Introduction

Full spectrum operations comprise offensive operation, stability, protective operation as well as support missions. The Offensive mission is intended at defeating the opponent. The defensive mission is intended to overcome opponent’s assault, save armed forces, or create circumstances beneficial for aggressive missions. Defensive operations generate situations for a counterattack that permits military forces to recover its plan. Stability missions, on the other hand, advances and guard national security by swaying the risk as well as political aspects of the operational setting. This stability is attained via a mixture of peacetime growth, supportive and forceful activities in reaction to an emergency. Support operations involve using the military in helping civil establishments in getting ready to counter disaster or emergency and alleviate affliction. Efficient military training is the foundation of every mission’s success.

Singapore peacekeeping participation commenced in the year 1989 when the SAF force was dispatched to monitor Namibian elections. However, the present training structure makes SAF armed forces to assume the function of a cruel warfare machine whose main responsibility is to resolutely conquer the opponent and break their spirit to battle. But when it comes to the stability or support operations that are elements of full-spectrum operation, the SAF soldiers have to safeguard the civilians in their control. They are required to be receptive to civilians’ emotions as well as engage in community development, for instance, construction of schools and helping in constructing fundamental infrastructure. Therefore, there exist an apparent disjoint relating to what the present combatant is trained to perform and that which they carry out in the