Functional theory of group communication focuses on the process of how group make a decisions by connection between the quality of communication and the quality of group output. Communication has ability to determine the group outcome. Theorists have identified several functional requisites for effective decision making. The original problem solving process is created by John Dewey: expressing a difficulty, defining the problem, analyzing the problem, suggesting solutions, comparing alternatives and testing them, and implementing the best solution. To illustrate, people have different taste in traveling. Some may like backpacking, others may like luxury. When it comes to travel in a group of friend who has different background and experience, …show more content…
Many Northern luminaries have also been critical, saying that the move will embolden the rebellion, foment an eventual race war, weaken the resolve of Union forces, and make reunification impossible. House Speaker Thaddeus Stevens declared that Congress would “move quickly to pass a law invalidating the President’s rash and impolitic proclamation and instead enact more sensible legislation”. 83. Describe how news about the Emancipation Proclamation has been framed by this article. This article initial reporting the fact that President Lincoln has issued a proclamation but the rest of the article are pointing to the way how President Lincoln was like mentioning in the article “hypocritical and morally inadequate” 84. What effect would you expect that frame might produce among readers? Citizen will criticize about President Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation which may end up in a protest or chaos. In the same time, people may not trust in the news but will question the President’s acts. 85. What alternative frame might the writer have considered? In other words, how else might the writer have approached reporting this same news? This article framed the news by damaging President Lincoln regarding his Emancipation Proclamation. The article can also be framed as a supporting to the president. 86. What is the agenda that has been set for the public by this news
Thus the North was as racial unequal as the South. Woodward also mention a view of the situation through the speeches given by former president Lincoln, the “emancipator” as he stated himself. “We can not, then make them equals. I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race,” Lincoln mention in one of his speeches. This soon change as a variety of inconsitancy emerging between race relations as the freed slaves become more assertive, ambitious and confident.
In what ways did the South’s detest of Northern create rifts in the reconstruction process during the Reconstruction Era? Were the newly emancipated blacks truly free during the reconstruction period? In what ways? How were the three different Reconstruction plans similar and different to each other, in terms of structure and execution prowess?
In this paper there has been a discussion of the legislation and the tensions preceding the southern Secession. Based on this discussing it can be concluded that the tensions, which culminated with the Civil War, were present many decades before the secession itself. Even threats of Civil war and secession were present much prior to this particular conflict. This paper has also concluded that the threat of Lincoln was real to the South, because of the Republican party’s very distinct foundation as an anti-slavery party. Slavery was a soft spot in the South because of the substantial value slaves had.
The significance of President Lincoln’s election was that the South took it as an indication that there was to be no compromise. The Emancipation Proclamation freed no slaves, as it only freed slaves in states in rebellion. The Emancipation Proclamation was effective January 1, 1863. Lincoln intended to eliminate or restrict slavery, believed the Southern states and this was one of the causes of the American Civil
’s Thesis was centered around the idea that Lincoln viewed emancipation as “a goal to be achieved through prudential means, so that worthwhile consequences might result.” He argued that every gradual step Lincoln took towards the abolition of slavery was done to “balance the integrity of ends with the integrity of means,” to accomplish this while still placing the constitution above all of his personal opinions. Guelzo then presented and answered four questions that he believed arose as a result of his prudence argument; why is the language of the Proclamation bland, did the Proclamation actually do anything, did the slaves free themselves, and finally did Lincoln issue the Proclamation to only to prevent European intervention or inflate Union morale? In response to the first, Guelzo makes the point that the Proclamation was a legal document, and that “every syllable was liable to… legal
When the union won the civil war in 1865 it gave millions slaves their freedom but there was a bigger process in rebuilding the south. As Andrew Johnson in 1865 new southern state leaders passed “Blacks Codes” to control the behavior of former slaves and blacks. Many people in the north were very upset about these codes. since the North was very upset with this indecent that happened. It wore away their supporter known as the presidential reconstruction and led to victories of the radical parts of the republican party.
Describing how the government and its resources would “be in the hands of your enemy” after inauguration, the speech concludes by stressing how conventional political resistance is futile. (58) Endless debate over slavery had dominated the lives of legislators in America for decades, which causes Toombs to assert that Northern political aggression has created the conditions for secession. A belief in Southern difference, the adversarial nature of the Northern states prompted secessionism to take root.
This proclamation also stated northern slaves would not be freed because Lincoln did not have the necessary power to do so. However, the North had many goals for Reconstruction as well. Except, the one overall goal of
During Abraham Lincoln’s campaigning for presidency, Lincoln expressed his contemporary view that he believed whites were superior to blacks, not as a race, but as a stigma that history had placed, especially amongst the 1858 debates with Stephen Douglas, so when Lincoln passed the Proclamation, he truly believed that he was doing the right thing. This gained the support from people in the Union and the Union as a whole, but ended up putting the Confederates at much more unrest. Even though all of this occured, the 1863 Emancipation Proclamation wasn’t given without some type of warning. Abraham Lincoln passed the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22nd, 1862. It stated that if the Southern states did not cease their rebellious acts by January 1st, 1863, then Proclamation would go into effect.
Oakes’ masterful command of the broad literature of slavery, race, and the Civil War era allows him to trace the parallel journeys of two iconic American leaders. Oakes tells an absorbing and didactic story, shifting between accounts of Lincoln and Douglas and ending with their meetings in the White House. By portraying Douglas as a character of equal significance as Lincoln, Oakes not only provides insight into Douglas’s life but also enriches the study of Lincoln. The convergence of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas during the nation’s greatest crisis reveals “what can happen when progressive reformers and savvy politicians make common cause”
McClellan retreated thinking his army was outnumbered two to one when in actuality he had 70,000 men while the South only had 25,000. The newspapers exploded with the news. The South was ecstatic while the North’s morale dropped very low. McPherson showed how Lincoln had written his famous Emancipation Proclamation but had stored it in a desk drawer waiting for a victory.
Southerners disliked the messages it spread, and how much positive attention it received (Doc. 5). Conflicts grew as documents became debates; debates became protests, which turned violent (Doc.
Guelzo proposes in his essay that Lincoln intended on abolishing slavery and completed this by signing the Emancipation Proclamation, crediting the Emancipation Proclamation as the most revolutionary pronouncement ever signed by an American president. He supports his thesis by compiling different evidence and
His work penetrates American life daily. The laws put in place by President Lincoln before and after the Civil War have, impact the interpretation of laws in today’s courts. Fundamental American ideals was expanded and redefined by his very words: “Nowhere in the world is presented a government of so much liberty and equality. To the humblest and poorest amongst us are held out the highest privileges and positions. The present moment finds me at the White House, yet there is as good a chance for your children as there was for my father's.”
In society today, communication classes are highly over looked because of our new developing technology. People don’t realize how much a communication class could benefit them. We have lost sight of verbal communication skills. This class has taught me to put my phone down and communicate with others. It has opened my eyes to the real world without technology.