Future of Life Chapters 6-7
Daniel H
It Says/Quote:
“When the great forest is gone, possibly by 2020 at the present rate of cutting, there will be no more jobs. Land cut over in the region is mostly abandoned, and poverty within it is greater than before.
I Say/Summary:
As the local people continue to cut down more and more trees, they are digging their own grave, as when the forest is gone they will be in even harsher conditions, with more deficits and poverty. The Author is saying how these local people only see the short term outcomes, and ignore the bigger picture. These people are fixated on the problems they have on hand right now such as feeding their families, so they forget that it is the forest that provides for them and by cutting it down they are digging themselves a deeper hole. Wilson is telling us that if we want to preserve the earth, we have to reach out to these people and create solutions that work towards saving the earth and benefiting these local people and meeting their demands as well. Saving the earth cannot be done with just preservationist policy, but we need to create an effective plan that benefits both parties.
…show more content…
Clarifying
When reading this quote, I felt as if the author was comparing us to the local people and how we are alike. We only focus on the short term goals such as getting money, yet never think too much about the future. We as a species constantly use up the earth, yet when the earth disappears, we are going to be poverty and there are going to be a lot of shortages around the globe. However, he also gives a positive message when he compares us to the local people. He is saying that the problem we are dealing isn’t impossible to solve, and if we work towards a solution than it is possible to solve this
Victor’s Family Counselors often will have clients decide to come to therapy because the client is having trouble grieving the loss of a loved one, thing, or pet. Different cultures handle death differently. The case study in Chapter 15 in The Life Span book written by Broderick and Blewitt (2015), introduces a family who is having a difficult time accepting the death of Victor. Victor is married to Isabella, for fifty-three years the couple lived together. The couple who is Italian has four adult children, Paul, Sophia, and twins Lenore and Joseph.
Wilson’s use of satire and other rhetorical devices effectively exposes the immature nature of the arguments between these two groups as well as demonstrate how counterproductive they can be. Wilson’s format is the first striking thing the reader notices. Both passages have the same general structure: They both begin by discrediting the other group, they both claim their group is entirely irreproachable, and they conclude by briefly establishing their own goals and ideas. This not only proves how similar the strategies are, but also establishes the immature and ineffective nature of these arguments.
Critical Review The Working Poor: Invisible in America David K. Shipler is a book that could be most accurately described as eye-opening. Shipler opens up the book on his claim that “nobody who works hard should be poor in America.” America is built upon the idea that the harder one works, the better off one will be. Shipler then goes on to explain how the poor, often times, work the hardest jobs and are put into the worse conditions, but still do not grow to become the most successful. Using their lives as examples, Shipler illustrates the struggles the working poor face while attempting to escape poverty.
He supports his idea by mentioning Kirkpatrick Sale’s quote: “ The whole individualist what –you-can-to-do-save-the-Earth guilt trip is myth. We, as individuals, are not creating the crises, and we can’t solve them”
This will not be a quick or easy process, but it is doable. Carson reflects, “It took hundreds of millions of years to produce the life that now inhabits the earth … life reached a state of adjustment and balance with its surrounding” (890). Just because this process of protecting and eventually rebuilding our ecosystem may not ever be complete, does not mean that we can give up. We must be willing to take the first step and allow eminent domain to continue. As Fredrick Douglas once said, “If there is no struggle, there is no
The theme that the author is portraying, is that sometimes in life it's hard to do things that seem impossible, but we as humans can do anything if we put our minds to it. The figurative language that was present within the book was incredible. As a result, my options were limited. The first figurative language that symbolizes the importance of a forest was described, “This forest eats itself and lives forever” (5). This particular quote gave non living things, humans characteristics.
The government has passed many conservation policies to protect animals, eco-systems, plants and trees itself and indigenous people’s way of life, but many of these policies get overlooked and require a lot of extra work. How it affects the rest of the world- This action is permanent, and all of the world is targeted as a potential setting for deforestation. It is predicted that the continuing action may result in very few rainforest across the entire globe. Cutting trees can also be harmful to our ozone layer, which protects earth from dangerous radiation.
President Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, was known for his love of nature. This was conveyed most strongly in his speeches, such as “Conservation as a National Duty”, in which he advocated for the preservation of natural resources in the interests of the nation and its people. In this speech as well as others he gave during his term as President, he stressed that conservation did not just pertain to preserving natural resources or deferring their exhaustion; rather, it was closely intertwined with the patriotic duty of ensuring that the nation would be able to provide for future generations, and was second only to the “great fundamental questions of morality”. One such example of how Roosevelt connected conservation with morality is found in his “The New Nationalism” speech, given in Osawatomie, Kansas in 1910. Here, he compares the way he believes the nation must behave in terms of conservation to the manner in which a farmer acts in reference to his children and the land that provides for them.
If the decline of the middle class continues in the U.S., in the years ahead, he stated that roads and bridges will start to deteriorate. Many public schools will begin to struggle with preparing students for the job market. Consumer spending’s will start to decrease. Small business will begin to close one by one and it’ll be harder for new ones to open up. Last but least big corporate like Amazon will and Apple will scrounge the country to cope with chronic engineering shortages.
The first lesson taken away from reading The American Book of Living and Dying is the importance of forgiveness as in the story of Annie. She is a lot like many people’s story who are angry because life did not turn out the way they expected. They blame themselves for not accomplishing what they think could have been their full potential and worry about what family and other think about them constantly ourselves. The second lesson learned is that it is not over until God says it over as in the case of Henry. His doctor though it would have been better if he died, but he made it through.
In Edward O. Wilson’s book The Future of Life, he satirizes the unproductive nature that hold opposing attitudes about environmentalism. Wilson shows this by using examples in his writing. He shows the reader in that he is using satire by making the statement “Environmentalists or conservationists is what they usually call themselves.” Wilson shows the reader in that paragraph that he does not hold respect for the title the environmentalists give themselves. Wilson also shows the same thing to the reader in his second passage “Critics of the environmental movement ?
Ethos, pathos and logos are the three rhetorical appeals that I use everyday. I used it in many discussions with my mom, arguments with my siblings, or just simply as asking my friend to go out at night. Since the used of it is not mentioned frequently, people often don’t know the meaning of tools and whether they had used it or not. Rhetorical tools are used in an argument, especially when you try to persuade someone with the opposite view or someone who is still shilly-shally about the issue. After the first journal I wrote, I had discover more about how to use those tools and how to evaluate it.
The “3R”s principle can be a fabulous yet easy start to help contributing. Individual involvements can give the problem of climate change and its prevention a massive boost if everybody has a consciousness and acknowledgement of the power of concerned effort, an effort that is irreplaceable. All in all, society is the polymer of individuals and normal populaces’ belief is representing the whole social atmosphere to a great extent. Taking both points into consideration, I firmly believe that individual citizens cannot sit back and say it is someone else’s responsibility to protect the environments; we must all play our part-individual citizens, governments and big businesses
That means moving to cities not to the woods. This further illustrates that living off the grid is only valuable to the individual and not to the environment as a