ipl-logo

Gaius Marius

1227 Words5 Pages

The Ancient Roman republic lasted many years from 509 BCE all the way to 27 BCE during such time Rome was nearly destroyed many times with people like Hannibal, Spartacus and other non foreigners like Sulla for example. But the kind of destruction that Hannibal was ready to bring was nothing compared to what Gaius Marius dished out. Gaius Marius was a Roman general and politician. Marius’ fame soars with him winning many outstanding victories in Africa while acting as general of the legion there. He is soon commissioned to fight the oncoming barbarians that have been pillaging the north, northeastern borders of Rome for some time. There he is given the rank of consul and his time into the patrician politics really begin and the reforms …show more content…

He also changed the way they fought and their mindset towards their fellow legionnaires and their legatus. Marius was said to train with his men, march from time to time, eat with them and speak with them which earned him the men’s trust and respect, their loyalty and their swords which meant they were loyal to him and Rome second, this is also seen later in the story of Rome when Julius Caesar had the loyalty of his legions and in the end that let him cross the Rubicon without fear of treachery (At least now). The idea of the legions being more loyal to their legatus goes even further down the timeline where there is a constant “Emperor” emerging trying to take control during the “Year of Five Emperors”. The loyalty to the generals and not the country is a recurring theme that Marius …show more content…

The empire of Rome had a slow fall due to its poor leaders, the republic of Rome had a very quick death due to the corruption of its leaders, the empire had one man to control all and it would usually be overwhelming and the republic had a great many “leaders” all whom wanted to be the leader-iest leader of all the other leaders. Corruption and power are one and the same, it takes a great person, a legend almost to be able to maintain absolute power without absolute corruption. Alexander the great was a great leader because he had wars to fight and people to kill he had a singular goal. Ramases II was a great leader since he had a very poor Egypt to return to its former status. These goals help a leader to remain calm and away from their inner thoughts, but when your inner thoughts are screaming old men and power hungry, conceited “lad” it would not take long before someone gets mad enough to silence the rest of these voices. Marius did not try to reach for the level of “silence” that his rival Sulla did nor did he go near the levels of future Emperors to rid them of the noise, Marius was not the source of the corruption in politics but he was a great helper to

Show More
Related

  • 'Hero In Killing Caesar' By Jon Herman

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    Caesar was a great military leader, he was a man of strength, and he conquered all of Rome. Caesar was not afraid to take charge to take Rome high and make them more powerful. If he had to Caesar would kill anyone that stood in his way of making Rome more powerful. “Kill everyone inside” “without hesitation, his men, swords drown, burst inside the bar, and soon the street was quiet.”

    Read More

  • Michael Grant's The Fall Of The Roman Empire

    274 Words  | 2 Pages

    As Rome’s government began to change, the leadership became much less consistent. According to a chart compiled from various resources that lists the Roman emperors between 235 BCE and 285 BCE (Document 1), a majority of these emperors ruled for roughly two to three years, however some reigned for as little as or less than a year and some as much as seven to eight years. This constant change in leadership left the Roman army questioning their leadership often times more devoted to their earnings than to the man paying them. These leaders became careless as time went on, as stated in Vegetius’ Concerning Military Matters (Document 2), and the conflicting and constantly changing opinions on military strategy left the rigor and morale of the army in shambles. He states “...because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.

    Read More

  • Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    626 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 27 BCE (Before Common Era) the Roman Empire was entering its golden age, “The Pax Romana.” During the Pax Romana, the citizens of all Roman cities enjoyed free food and entertainment along with access to all of the Roman amenities such as bathhouses, roads, and mail service. However in 180 CE (Common Era) the Roman empire took a turn for the worse and eventually the last empire fell in 476 CE. The once powerful Roman Empire was in shambles. So what happened to the empire?

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Dbq

    1993 Words  | 8 Pages

    Death of the Republic 91202 James Morrissey Power in a name Julius Caesar was popular among the citizens of Rome. Caesar had gained this popularity due to his successes in war for Rome and the laws he created for the wellbeing of Rome. The reason Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC was due to declaring himself dictator for life of Rome. This is because the term dictator was considered a toxic word in Roman politics as almost all previous dictators had been tyrants in Roman history. The senators who assassinated Caesar believed that they would be celebrated for killing Caesar .

    Read More

  • How Did Pompey Contribute To The Fall Of The Roman Republic

    1504 Words  | 7 Pages

    Caesar eventually defeated Pompey and was the sole rule of Rome, thus tried reforming every aspect of the people’s life. As a result, Caesar ruling as a dictator significantly contributed to the fall of the Roman republic as Rome was no longer a republic but a

    Read More

  • Why Did Rome Fall

    543 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rome was a very powerful empire, but eventually fell because of one thing, weak political leadership. Weak political leadership was the main reason why Rome fell and it was more of a chain because when there is bad leadership then there is bad military and more invaders. The invasions got more effective and hurt the empire a lot more than it should have at that time. First of all Rome went from a republic to a empire with all the power and rights from the people slowly slipping away to the all powerful emperors at the end. Emperors did not want to share any power with the people which was very bad because they only paid attention to power, for example how Julius Caesar get kill/assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE in Rome, Italy.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Research Paper

    1179 Words  | 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar was a politician, general, and dictator. He once said, “It is easier to find men who will volunteer to die than to find those who are willing to endure pain with patience.” He was an incredible speaker of the time and was very well liked by most citizens. He brought a lot of change to Rome and was a very strong leader. Julius Gaius Caesar was born in Rome Italy, in 100 B.C., on July 13th.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Julius Caesar

    1255 Words  | 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

    Read More

  • Roman Republic Research Paper

    693 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

    Read More

  • Fall Of The Roman Republic Essay

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar: Hero Or Villain

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.

    Read More

  • Plutarch's The Life Of Marius Analysis

    1492 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.

    Read More

  • Why Did The Roman Republic Fall

    913 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many different internal and external pressures lead to the destruction of the Roman Republic. Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general, dictator and optimate, anticipated and was aware of the results of many powerful and

    Read More

  • Examples Of Indecisiveness In Hamlet

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    This shows why the problems he faced with suicidal thoughts, his father’s ghost, and his vengeance to Claudius are the main ways to show why he was

    Read More

  • How Did Ancient Greece Influence Ancient Rome

    1428 Words  | 6 Pages

    He was always courageous and persistent in battle, which made many individuals admire him. Similarly, Julius Caesar was a leader of Ancient Rome. In the beginning of Caesar’s reign, he

    Read More

More about Gaius Marius

Open Document