Gandhi And The Apostle Paul Analysis

1025 Words5 Pages

Every artist, writer, creator, etc., is different from the next in some way shape or form. Sometimes an artist or author can seem similar, because of inspiration they might get from another artist. In prison literature, though they all write in one specific genre, every story and account that is created by an author is different. Some just have similar stories, as well as delivering their stories to their audience. The writings of Gandhi and the Apostle Paul, though quite different writers and pieces of literature, are alike and different in how they are delivered and whom they are delivered to.
Gandhi is most popularly known for using his non-violent leadership against the British rule in India. In his speech, "Speech in the Trial of 1922," Gandhi definitely expresses the motif of status quo. He lives his life sort of ignorant, until he realizes that the British rule is a corruption to his people. After figuring out the bittersweet news, he was determined to change it. Since he was a non-violent nationalist, he did no harm to anyone even if his flesh wanted to. Non-violence was after all his “first article” of his faith (Gandhi pg.108 para.2).
For the Apostle Paul, he was known for …show more content…

The Apostle Paul shows proof of this in the very first paragraph of his letter to his coterie: he says that he is “a prison of Christ Jesus” (Paul pg.7 para.2). I personally am a Christian, but I would never call myself a prisoner. This shows just how life dedicated this man was as well as how times have drastically changed from his decade. Another similar detail is the tone of both writings. They both portrait a tone of peacefulness, neither author showing the emotion of concern for their well being, or at least not in their writing. Since they were important and popular leaders, if they were concerned, they probably would not have showed their weakness to their

Open Document