Around 10 million adults alone in the United States as of 2017 consider themselves to be part of the LGBT community, these are 10 million adults who can be discriminated against, weather this is access to something as important as medical care or something as simple as a wedding cake for their wedding they can be refused access to this. In 1993 The Religious Freedom Restoration Act was passed in order to provide “stronger laws and enforcement for exercising religion” and so that it could play a valid part in our foreign policy; yet it is hardly used in our foreign policy and in some cases can cause more problems than solutions. This has become a national debate, even still today because of the obvious outcomes it could have regarding gay-marriage. …show more content…
In 1993 the RFRA was used for a multitude of different reasons than it’s used for today. In 1993 after two Native American Indians were fired from their jobs and denied because they used peyote, an illegal drug commonly used in their religious ceremonies, and seeking out for an answer they turned to the supreme court to pass the act, but about 10 years after this act was passed uprising problems …show more content…
Klein case. In Oregon on January 13 of 2016, a women, Rachel Cryer and her mom, Cheryl Cryer walk into a Bridal Expo. and talk to Melissa Klein;Melissa Klein was honored when she was chosen to make a cake for Rachel and her fiance, Laurels, special day. Melissa acquired Rachels email and set up a cake tasting date for her and her fiance to come in and try cake for their wedding to take place in June. After four days passed Melissa contacted Rachel after she had found out that Rachel was getting married to another women. It disgusted Melissa that a gay couple would get married; let alone ask her to bake a cake for their wedding. Devastated, Rachel and Laurel filed a complaint to the Department of Justice. Then between January 17th to mid February both couples go on countless amounts of talk shows and newspapers and by the end of February the Department of Justice drops the case. Next on August 8th, Rachel files a complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries, spurring an investigation, and this complaint will later be investigated. In March the bureau holds a hearing to decide whether the acts that occurred were so harmful they the Kleins would be obligated to pay emotional damage fines. The Bureau of Labor come to the conclusion that the Kleins are to pay $135,000 to the Bowman-Cryers. But this story doesn 't stop here, in August the Kleins pair up with Ted Cruz in his
Brandon Woody English 3604-201 Dr. Reginald Martin 7/9/2015 Uproar Over Marriage Equality June 26th, 2015 was a monumental day for the LGBT community due to the Supreme Court of the United States deciding that preventing gay couples from getting married was unconstitutional, consequently legalizing same sex marriage in all 50 states. The response to the SCOTUS?s decision has been mixed, with supporters expressing elation to detractors displaying disappointment and anger in response to the ruling. Although I wouldn?t describe myself to be elated when news of the legalization of gay marriage was revealed, I am in support of the decision the Supreme Court handed down. I consider myself a supporter of the Supreme Court?s decision for the following reasons: the United States has long been a global leader on social issues; legislation in the modern era shouldn?t be based upon the rules included in archaic religious texts, and there are far greater issues that deserve the
This case involves the wrongful death of Bianca Barnes age 10 years old at a skating rink. On December 25, 2000 Bianca Barnes took a bus from her home in Ruleville to the Spotlite Skating Rink in Greenwood. Shortly after arriving at the rink Bianca fell once, hit her head and began to cry. After she stopped crying she decided to ride the bus back home and because her mom was at work she went to a neighbor’s home. Bianca’s mother didn't learn about the fall until the next day after the incident occurred, at the time Bianca became unconscious and was taken to the local hospital.
It was held in the courtroom of Judge Thomas Crain. Harris and Blanck hired Max D. Steuer as their lawyer. People filled up the courtroom calling out that Blanck and Harris were “murderers” and yelling “we want our children back.” 160 total witnesses were presented for both sides, but Kate Alterman’s story was a big factor in deciding if the owners were guilty or innocent. She stated “I wanted to go up Greene street side, but the whole door was in flames, so I went in hid myself in the toilet rooms and bent my face over the sink, and then ran to the Washington side elevator, but there was a big crowd
In the end, I believe we failed to see the real goal behind this case, which was demonstrated by the ruling. Closing Statement: Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, here we have Ms. Abigail, an intelligent, self-sustained woman. She is now looking to whole-heartly love her twins, considering she is legally their mother from a legally binding contract between Ms. Abigail and the defendant, which was attested legal by Professor Darrow. Both parties were aware of this arrangement when the contract was signed, and in fact, happy about it, as stated by Miss Eggbert. Ms. Bertha agreed to the paid sum of $30,000 upfront and an additional $3,000 a month while she was pregnant and the 6 months following the birth of the twins, as well as all the hospital fees.
Turlip told her where to go and then Clark started to tell her what happened but Turlip told her she didn’t want to know the details because she wasn’t allowed and it would get her in trouble. Turlip told her to see the ADA when she went to the courtroom. Clark never mentioned it again. When the case came before Turlip, she disclosed to both ADA Brian Gallagher and defense attorney Terri Pawelski that she knew both parties involved in the case. Turlip also knew Pawelski’s sister pretty well and the rest of her family.
He explains that this in turn leads to unfair representation and unresolved rape cases. Krakauer describes this situation through the case of Kelsey Belnap. After providing convincing evidence to the prosecutor, mother Terry Belnap states, “‘We were left with no answers and no further investigation….I really felt that we were brushed off’” (44). Krakauer uses this testimony to show that the prosecutor's lack of care towards the victim in pushing forth their case.
The Lawrence v. Texas ruling paved the way for equal treatment for gays and lesbians and brought them under the umbrella of the society by acknowledging their sexual preferences. 2. For the purpose of the paper we have chosen two American states - Florida and
Gay people have found themselves not having access to the rights promised to them by The Declaration of Independence. A pamphlet detailing this disparity said, “The homosexual American citizen finds himself denied many of the unique and special features of American life that are guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence.” (Document H). Gay people were prosecuted by many people in the 1960’s. Being an openly gay person opened you up for being unjustly arrested, losing your job for no reason, and other things similar to that.
This amendment safeguards American’s rights to freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. By protecting our freedom of religion, the government cannot force a religion on the people and allows us to choose and practice any religion that we want to, how we want to. Since I grew up in a practicing Christian household, I can truly appreciate and place great worth in this amendment for defending my right to believe in what I want to believe in. Through protecting our freedom of speech, it allows us to speak out and voice our opinions on the government and express our feelings about political figures, laws, regulations, etc. By also protecting our right to assemble and petition, Americans can request for changes and adjustments
We are allowed to voice our opinions. There is separation of church and state, which means that there can’t be laws made about religion. Recently, gay marriage was made legal in all fifty states. However, a judge in Kentucky has denied same-sex couples marriage licenses. It could be argued that if she denied it for her own religious beliefs, it violates the First Amendment.
The FISA and the USA Patriot Act The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA Patriot Act) are two actions taken to aid in the efforts against terrorism in the United States. FISA was enacted in 1978 and the U.S. Patriot Act was enacted in 2001 (McAdams III, no date). Both Acts have been and will continue to be critical instruments to combat terrorism. However, the media has exploited these Acts in terms of civil liberties and has demoralized the truth behind them.
The role that the news media covered on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act was shaping the State of Indiana to hate all people who does not practice same marriage, or homosexual acts. The mass media had to have an open mind and not judge neither the same sex couples or those who believed that same sex couples would be judged by others or judged by God. The mass media’s job in this reform was to bring different views of people that has a voice on such topic as the “the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Famous people such as Hillary Clinton, Reggie Miller both agree that this act should not be passed by Governor Pence, according to Ft. Wayne Indiana News station.
According to the Constitution, people can’t be stripped from their inalienable rights which are “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Despite the implement of the Constitution, “freedom” was defined differently in the 1980s than it was in the 20th century. Back in the 1980s, “freedom” was still not seen as a right to all people due to some of the laws such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act” that were implemented to go against the Constitution. While, in the 20th century, “freedom” was viewed as a right since “freedom” was offered to every people no matter what their race, their color of the skin, their religion, and their sexuality. For example, former president Barack Obama was able to make same-sex marriage legal, lifted the restriction on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” barred employers for firing their employees for being either transgender or having a different sexuality, allowed everyone to have universal access to ObamaCare, and had a diversified cabinet that helped Obama make tough decisions to make America the most affluent and strongest country in the world.
Religion seems to play an important and controversial role between issues that involve the LGBTQ society. Before American Democracy can answer any of these questions, a line needs to be drawn between politics and
Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.