Deploying Professor John Carl Flugel’s Psychology of Clothes in conjunction with queer theory — particularly the theories of Judith Butler, this essay will attempt to examine the concepts of gender and identity in relation to artist Grayson Perry, ‘Britain’s pre-eminent transvestite’ through the lens of adornment.
Gender can be defined as a set of different attributes and behaviours that comply to the socially constructed masculine/feminine binary. Adornment, has historically, at least from the 17th century onwards in Western society (Wilson, 1985, p. ), been a highly significant gender divisive tool useful for deciphering apparent ‘identities’, “in the case of an individual whom we have not previously met, the clothes he is wearing tell us
…show more content…
This notion can be translated in terms of dress in that men have had the practicality of bifurcated pants for the best part of dress history, while women’s legs remained encircled in dresses and skirts thus, we have preconceived notions that dresses are strictly to be worn by women and trousers by men. Though the latter of these gendered garments has fully come into public acceptance as an article that can be worn by women too. A man in a dress, however, remains in contemporary society more of a stark view than a woman in trousers due to the fact that it is accepted that women may dress in the style of men for reasons comfort and practicality as opposed to the vision of a man wearing a dress which is often considered perverse or comical. Clothing and other forms of adornment, i.e, the use of make-up; the styling of hair, etc are integral elements of cross-dressing and thus play a huge role in this …show more content…
The primary functionality of bodily adornment is one much contested between the three headings of modesty, protection and decoration. However, Flugel, among many of his peers and historians of dress conclude that decoration was and still is the main objective for adornment (1930, pp. 15-25). Clothing in this case can often be regarded as an outward projection of one’s inner identity, e.g the fashion of subcultures, punks’ rebellious use safety pins as adornment signify that the wearer identifies with punk movement, etc. Thus, in our gendered society the wearing of a dress is intrinsically linked with the feminine gender and the concept of identifying as a woman.
Cross-dressing challenges this binary structure, in some cases, while in others it reinforces the normative practices pertaining to gender. A figure like Grayson Perry, who unapologetically presents himself as ‘a man in a dress’ subverts this preconceived gender role that dresses are for women, whereas in other instances — EJ for example, who was previously referenced, in conversation with Grayson Perry notes that his own aversion to and fear of wearing a dress as a transgender man feeds further into the restrictive masculine/feminine binary. (Channel 4, 2016, b)
Expounding on Scott’s gender analysis are Theda Perdue and Jennifer Morgan who focus specifically on the bodies of Indian and black women. For both Cherokee and black women, they are often overshadowed by men, their stories eclipsed due to the assumption that under the institution of slavery, women’s experiences were not much different than men. Perdue and Morgan challenge this notion, demonstrating that the lives and experiences of black and Cherokee women were different than black and Cherokee men. In placing black women and Cherokee women at the center of the narrative, Perdue and Morgan seek to enhance understanding the functions Cherokee and black women played in colonial America and how they responded to the gendered roles they were expected
This meant that there was a dramatic increase of women wearing pants (Guenther, 2004) [Figures 1 & 2] because they needed more comfortable and practical clothing to be able to work the heavy labour jobs they had taken over while the men were away at war (Tortora and Marcketti, 2015). Conversely, during Elizabethan times, clothing was restrictive but it was male actors who were allowed to cross-dress, as women were not allowed to act in theatres. During this time, nearly the entire population, from the upper classes to lower classes wore a ruff which encircled the neck, this dis-joined the head from the body and furthered restricted movement (Entwistle and Wilson (Eds), 2001) [Figure 3].
Although George uses generalized ideas and doesn’t seem to have a strong voice on the topic of girls being dressed more sexually, her goal to raise awareness is effectively presented by constructing a common ground with the readers, and allowing the readers to critically think about the problem by providing contradictions. In the article, George begins by saying how provocative clothing is becoming more popular with little girls in schools, and how school officials have had to change the dress code due to
Men get to wear whatever they want on the streets and rarely being catcalled or such but once a woman gets to wear what she wants to wear, she receives weird stares from strangers around her. In our society, people usually divide girls into two types, the conservative one and the malandi one as of what they wear. I will use this two types of woman as an insight to the freedom of what we wear according to two philosophers, E.B Skinner and Jean-Paul Sartre. In a scenario of two women who wore shorts were walking down the street and were both catcalled by men in the past and later on, the first woman, X, starts to wear conservative clothes while, the second woman, Y, still wears the same style. Jean-Paul Sartre defines freedom as man is so free, so indeterminate, and man has no history.
Androgyny and the third gender are present in many cultures and each combination of masculine and feminine qualities make it a unique phenomenon that is on an individual basis. Since ancient times to present day, the idea of the third gender has been discussed by many scholars, as well as how to truly define gender. It is undeniable that androgyny has become more mainstream as of recent, especially with help from the fashion industry in the early 2000s when they began to employ androgynous models as well as designing androgynous clothing. Since this third gender is finally receiving more recognition, it is important to understand where the term comes from, and how it exists in many cultures. In this paper, I intend on exploring the history
(Kremer) The distinctions between male and female dress began to reflect larger cultural shifts in the eighteenth century. Fashion was redefined as feminine and light-hearted, furthermore representing women as unsuitable for education or citizenship and lacking reason by nature. Solely men were considered gifted with rational thought which entitled them to be politically empowered. They expressed this in their clothing, replacing the heeled shoes with the promising three-piece suits, carefully avoiding standing out too much from each other.
Gender roles are present everywhere and are more and more prevalent the further back you go. They define relationships and heavily influence people's actions. Gender roles can hurt those that are trapped in them because they are not allowed the freedom of living like they want. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, one key relationship in the story is wrecked by gender roles.
Thus, in doing gender, one does not move beyond this context, but instead gender identity is “performatively constituted by the very “expressions” that are said to be its result” (55). Gender, for Butler, is “the repeated stylization of the body, a set of repeated acts within a highly rigid regulatory frame,” it is something fluid that congeals over time “to produce the appearance of substance, of a natural sort of being” (63). In this sense, one can never become woman because there is no ontological ‘woman’; it is a “substantive appearance” (64). Butler uses the example of drag to illustrate how it disrupts the “very distinctions between the natural and the artificial, depth and surface, inner and outer through which discourse about genders almost always operates” (27). Drag is not an imitation of true gender, but an act that exposes foundational categories that create the notion of gender as an effect of a “specific formation of power” (27).
Many of the nobler sex seem to agree with us,” (Stanton 1). As the author includes this piece showing that even some men are adopting a woman's sense of fashion, it automatically gives the crowd a sense of
The very act of cross-dressing itself was subversive, especially in Spain where costume was hugely important, not just on stage but in real life. Literary critic William Egginton notes in An Epistemology of the Stage, that when it came to costume the "Spanish public was extremely sensitive to such signifiers of class and could not, for example, tolerate or comprehend a scene in which the signs of social status presented by costume and speech would conflict". (402) With the audience so sensitive to costume details, what must they have thought about Rosaura 's male attire? Women dressing as men was a common device used by playwrights in the Golden Age (mujer vestida de hombre ) and one wonders was it merely because it was practical?
In fact, all three of these cultures “have a long history of cross dressing that can be seen in their folklore, literature, theatre and music” (Jordan, 2017). The popularity of American drag rose nearing the 1920’s when queens like Julian Eltinge adorned fashionable garments and eccentric outfit changes for the purpose of female impersonation entertainment (Horwitz, 1998). Leading into the 21st century, drag was incredibly popular, from being on public television, to live shows in arenas, and social media accounts. A large argument that is presented is that all drag performers are gay, and this does not align with many American Christian values, but this is simply inaccurate and misunderstood. There are many straight male and female performers that specialize in drag makeup and fashion.
Walker writes this book in a culture when America has freed the slaves and a little after the reconstruction era. Ideally, it demonstrates the living of African Americans living in the south, therefore their treatment is culturally harsh. Basically, the characters in this book lived in a white male dominated society. The author includes the culture of the African people of Olinka. These two cultures of "black" heritage illustrates the customary gender roles, social status, religion, and material traits.
After the birth of modern fashion, Baroque costumes disappeared for a long time, until 1980s, the western social economy once again entered the stage of vigorous development, in a piece of fertile land, hedonism again, "after the Baroque" back to life in this rich soil in 1980s. The success of the "Resurrection" let no longer leave the core areas of the Baroque high fashion. Retain the most classic Baroque elements, while simultaneously removing those who do not meet the demand of modern clothing dross! The heavy volume is too large; the stupid panniers disappeared (although until today, you can still see the total in the evening gown dress, but they all do not belong to the daily dress). The classic "X profile", "Y profile" has become more fashionable, more rich in the characteristics of the moment.
Fashion, or rather the fashion industry, is ageist, sexist, racist, fattist and fascist, but only in so far as today’s society is. This industry is merely an extension of capitalism, and as such its only concern is generating as much profit as possible. Trying to include and represent all different types of people is very low on its priority list, so it continues to perpetuate harmful societal patterns, be it on purpose or not. The most blatant case of sexism in fashion is that women in this industry are by and large models, while the more powerful and influential positions of designers, managers and directors are usually taken by men.
She further suggests that there is a tendency to look beyond cross-dressing or ‘transvestism’ as it challenges the binary of ‘female and ‘male’. Garber is careful not to call it the ‘third sex’; instead she classifies it as ‘third’ which puts into question “identities previously conceived as stable, unchallengeable, grounded and known” (Garber 13). Keeping this in mind it is also important to answer certain questions regarding the cross-dressing motif. Questions such as does the use of cross-dressing motif point towards an interest in the historical practices or does it bring out the contemporary debate around gender? Secondly, what is accomplished by using this motif: - blurring of the gender differences or the heightening of the same?