Here I referred as men and women, it mostly represent the actual gender. Sometimes it gets vice-versa like whoever speaks or communicates like I have mentioned earlier, then they will come under that category. Thus I want to conclude my essay by saying our society plays a major role in making the mind of men and women to think in a particular way and if they try to change their view , then they are made fun of their ideas instead of thinking why only few changes when everyone goes in a single way. It’s not necessary to follow the society when you are having your own view and know the way to
Thesis: “This episode Crystallizes the irony that although American men tend to talk more than women in public situations, they often talk less at home. And this pattern is wreaking havoc with marriage” (Tannen 2). The author placed the thesis right after a personal experience story to help readers visualize her idea. Perhaps she is convincing her audience to agree with her thoughts. The next opening top sentence begins an argument of why men and women decided on divorces.
One of these perspectives is analyzing communication through gender. In the book, You Just Don’t Understand, Deborah Tannen (1990) popularized the term “genderlect” to describe the way in which men and women communicate with each other. She suggested that men and women have different styles of conversing, forming two distinct dialects. In a review of Tannen’s book, DeFrancisco (1992) attributed the differing communication styles of men and women to the respective cultures in which they grow up. Because of such gender differences, misunderstanding between men and women creates a gap in the communication process.
Tannen states that men are more likely to address, fix, and move on from a problem, whereas women are more likely to be sympathetic and helpful on an emotional level. Tannen believes men and women have misunderstandings because of their different approaches to conversation, making misunderstandings misinterpretations, rather than “right or wrong” scenarios. Tannen uses rhetorical phrases to explore the intricacies of conversation more in depth. Tannen also uses the phrases, “how” and “why,” to probe further into scenarios of conversations (Tannen). Tannen’s usage of stories create the tone of “Can’t We Talk?”, by making Tannen’s tone informative yet uncomplicated.
One of the behaviors that she observed was that females both girls and women gave more direct and emotional attention during conversations. The study was female to female conversations versus male to male; for boys and men, while they claim that they were paying attention they did not have the emotional and physical connections of their female counterparts; the physical connection Deborah noticed was mainly eye contact. The second additional behavior was verbal acknowledgment; women gave verbal sounds so that the speaker could not only see their attentiveness but also hear it. Deborah Tannen research on “cross-cultural communications” focused on communications; she points out the importance of communication not just putting the blame on the man or the women. The result is that once the problem has been acknowledge and understood there is a chance for improvement.
1. In chapter 8, Tannen mentions the communication differences between men and women that there are many communication styles of them, which is totally different between men and women even though if they grow up in the same place. They have such different outlooks on the world and a different idea of how to go about talking things out. Women often feel that their partner should be able to know what the woman wants without her saying, and men feel that the woman should be able to say exactly what it is they want, as women always look at the metamessages of conversation, but men just look at the messages. Additionally, during talking, women often feel that since men are more quitethe common stereotypes of American men when their partner is speaking whether or not he is hearing everything she is saying, it means that they are not listening, and men feel that since women make listening noises, women are impatient and not genuinely interested in what they are saying.
"Gender is such a familiar part of daily life that it usually takes a deliberate disruption of our expectations of how women and men are supposed to act to pay attention to how it is produced"(The Social Construction of Gender 65). This tells us that once someone does something out of the "norm" then we start to conceive ideas of what gender is and how it is produced. Once something is done out of what we were taught and perceived to believe is right we then frown upon these actions. Our genitalia is often used as an indicator of which sex we belong to. The reading also talks about gender stratification and how it ranks men above women.
Men and women differ in how they negotiate work and family in terms of balancing autonomy and intimacy (Seidman, 152). To provide further evidence, Kathleen Gerson, author of “The Unfinished Revolution,” divides women into two groups: those who prioritize family (traditionalists) and those who prioritize independent economic stability (self-reliant). Gerson observes that majority of women, across race and class, prefer to be self-reliant. These women still aspire to be in intimate relationships but expect career support from their male partner. These findings are unlike those from previous generations and are rooted in the entrance of women into the work force.
Man or woman, black or white. 3. Sexism at Workplace According to research carried out, the hypothesis states that women and minorities find it increasingly difficult to advance at higher levels of workplace power. Additionally, men are treated differently than women. You find that men are favored in terms of pay and ranks while women are treated as ‘wives’ (getting coffee, writing notes and being sent on errands) Solution Fairness should be employed.
While in modern times this considered untrue, it is still consider being very much true in many of the short stories we read. An example would be in “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, where the men think very little of the women comments and think they are the superior gender. As a result, the men’s identity is composed of being overconfident and inconsiderate. On the other hand, a woman’s identity is greatly affected by the stereotypes and roles society has set for them. In the short stories, many of the women’s identity were tied to their marriage.
In the article, “Sex, Lies and Conversation,” Tannen illustrates male and female have different characteristics and traits in their communication starting at a young age. These characteristics and traits provoke them to view the purpose of communication and behave differently. For example, women regard communication as a fundamental factor to create and foster a relationship. While men view communication as a way to dominate in relationships. Women need more intimate in a conversation compared with men.
She compares the “physical positon” between male and female during a conversation. Women talk face-to-face, while men look everywhere. The “physical position” cause women to consider men are not listening. As Tannen states, “The impression of not listening results from misalignments in the mechanics of conversation” (264). Besides, Tannen claims that men change a number of topics in a conversation, but women stay one topic instead.
The usual people-based view is that the bad mistreatment of women is well enough covered by class analysis. (related to feeling that women and men must be treated equally) explanation (of why something works or happens the way it does) insists that the class structures, and the bad mistreatment of women within male-run systems, are separate but interacting social processes. (people who feel strongly that women and men must be treated equally) (discussed back and forth) whether wives should be set apart and given out to classes on the basis of their husband 's occupation or the wife 's occupation. Now educated people study women 's position in (community of people/all good people in the world), and in the labor force, separately from class analysis. (based on actually seeing things) research has shown that the sex (separating things/separating people by race, religion, etc.)
In the article “Who Does The Talking”, Deborah Tannen implies that “women and men conversate equally” (Tannen 356). Tannen justifies this by researching women’s (“talking to much”) and men’s (“talking less than women”), but in reality the research found was that both men and women talk coequal.She describes and illustrates this research in order to inform readers don’t (“judge a book by it’s cover”) in other words do “research on women and men talk equally before suggesting that women talk more than men” (Tannen 356). Tannen addresses men and women by questioning who talks more ,and in this case, “researches were done on both men and women talking”,but both speak more in different
In the article “Sex, Lies, and Conversation” written Deborah Tannen, she states and discusses the differences between men and women communication and refers to it as cross-cultural communication. Females think intimacy and talking are the biggest parts of a relationship, males think less talking and more doing are the biggest parts of a relationship. Different genders have different listening strategies. Females face each other, make strong eye contact while talking about one subject. When males talk they sit angled from one another and their eyes wander the room when talking about multiple subjects.